Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush: "Iraq Inspections Not Encouraging"
Washington Post ^ | 12/02/02 | Sandra soberaj

Posted on 12/02/2002 12:15:41 PM PST by joesnuffy

WASHINGTON –– President Bush warned Iraq's Saddam Hussein that he has until a Sunday deadline to prove he is serious about averting war. After the first week of United Nations weapons inspections, Bush said: "So far, the signs are not encouraging."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; iraq; uninspections; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last
Comment #81 Removed by Moderator

To: k2blader
This is all part of the game. Hussein plays his part and we play ours. Bush wasn't surprised by any of this.
82 posted on 12/02/2002 2:18:34 PM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mhking
THEY BETTER NOT BOMB DURING "THE SIMPSONS"!
83 posted on 12/02/2002 2:24:26 PM PST by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Comment #84 Removed by Moderator

Comment #85 Removed by Moderator

To: SerpentDove
Just for you!
86 posted on 12/02/2002 2:34:39 PM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
LOL
87 posted on 12/02/2002 2:35:57 PM PST by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: TexVet
Don't confuse what you read about in America with what is going on over, around and in Iraq!

It is not just our people who are locked into what is going on over there. The UK's intel people have had people on ground for years as well as other intel.

Our military Intel is free from the Clintoonian virus that still infects our FBI.
88 posted on 12/02/2002 2:39:03 PM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

Comment #89 Removed by Moderator

To: hchutch
One question - if Saddam starts to make a move while the inspectors are still in there, do we try to get the inspectors out?

Nope. Do what Stallone did in Cobra when the maniac threatened to blow the store: "OK with me, I don't shop here anyway."

90 posted on 12/02/2002 2:44:30 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Southack
We'll make a very public fuss about Saddam's claim to not have "anything", and then we'll send inspectors and camera crews right to where we know he has at least one of something

I think it's more likely that Bush will have a nice slide show all readay to go. It will have fresh photographs of the goods, plus others showing the Iraqies moving them out the back door as, or just before, the inspectors come in the front door.

91 posted on 12/02/2002 3:28:50 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: mhking
I realize this runs the risk of getting real ugly real fast.

Sort of like stirring up a fire ant mound with your male sexual organ (Or, for the ladies, with your mammaries)?

Y'all keep your powder dry and your magazines loaded, it may get bumpy before Christmas.

92 posted on 12/02/2002 3:44:55 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
UN Inspectors in action...

Lots of candy-canes and gumdrops, but no WMDs here Mr. Hussein!

93 posted on 12/02/2002 3:52:06 PM PST by Caipirabob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty
Precisely.
94 posted on 12/02/2002 3:53:56 PM PST by New Horizon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: deport
"The temporary peace of denial and looking away from danger would only be a prelude to broader war and greater horror. America will confront gathering dangers early before our options become limited and desperate."

This sums up a policy, which makes sense. Does it mean that we are in "denial" about Saudi, Egypt? Or does it mean we "..will confront gathering dangers early..?"

In another place, Cheney says it will go on for years. That is difficult, for today's generations. They give blank stares, if reminded of "hundred years war" and "thirty years war."

The "cold war" with the USSR extended for 40 years. Reagan and Thatcher (almost alone) had the resolve to do what was necessary.

I fault Bush for not making the Big Case, that We Are AT War, the Enemy is (factions of) Islam, WEe Will Win.

I believe he feels the downside of doing such an expose exceeds the upside.
95 posted on 12/02/2002 4:10:45 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: k2blader
If he did not know this then he is dumber than Al Gore and more naive than Jimmy Carter. Sure hope not. Maybe he will call his good buddy and ours Vicente to get advice on what to do.
96 posted on 12/02/2002 6:46:36 PM PST by willyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

AP Update ... 2300 ET

Bush: Iraq Inspections 'Not Encouraging'

By RON FOURNIER, AP White House Correspondent

WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush (news - web sites) said Monday "the signs are not encouraging" that Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) will cooperate with weapons inspectors and avoid a war threatened by the United States.

Photo
AP Photo

As a Sunday deadline neared, the president said he won't tolerate "any act of delay, deception or defiance."

Even as U.N. investigators reported progress in their first week of work, Bush said war may prove necessary. "The temporary peace of denial and looking away from danger would only be a prelude to broader war and greater horror," he said.

"America will confront gathering dangers early before our options become limited and desperate."

Weapons inspectors are carrying out a United Nations (news - web sites) resolution ordering Saddam to rid Iraq of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons or face the prospect of war.

The lack of a confrontation thus far between Iraq and inspectors has the White House worried that the Iraqi president might be winning the early public relations battle by creating an impression that he is complying. Aides said those fears prompted the president and Vice President Dick Cheney (news - web sites) to deliver separate speeches Monday casting doubt on Saddam's intentions.

The U.N. resolution gives Iraq until Sunday to disclose its weapons of mass destruction, a deadline Bush and Cheney sought to cast as a major test of Saddam's will.

Iraq's ambassador to the United Nations, Mohammed Al-Douri, said the declaration could be ready as early as Wednesday. "There will be nothing surprising," Al-Douri said. "We have repeated our position several times that we have nothing hidden."

The White House disputed that contention again Monday. Senior officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, said U.S. intelligence has evidence of Saddam's weapons programs and is willing to share it with U.N. inspectors to help rebut the Iraqi declaration.

The U.S. is flying Predator unmanned surveillance aircraft to look for signs of Iraq's noncompliance with the inspections, said a defense official, also speaking on the condition of anonymity.

The U.N. inspectors completed their first week of work Monday by visiting alcoholic beverage plants and a factory that once made parts for now-banned missiles.

While inspectors said some equipment of interest was missing at the Karama ballistic design plant, they have reported no problems gaining access to suspect sites nor have they made public any findings of deadly weapons. Still, Bush sought to make the case that Saddam is not complying with the resolution and is not likely to give an honest accounting of his weapons programs.

"So far, the signs are not encouraging," Bush said as he signed a bill giving the U.S. military its largest spending increase since the Reagan administration.

"A regime that fires upon American and British pilots is not taking the path of compliance. A regime that sends letters filled with protests and falsehoods is not taking the path of compliance," Bush said.

He was referring to Iraqi letters to the U.N. protesting terms of the resolution.

In Denver, Cheney spoke ominously about the Sunday deadline. "This time deception will not be tolerated," he told 1,500 Air National Guard leaders. "The demands of the world will be met, or action will be unavoidable."

Answering critics of Bush's Iraq policy, Cheney also said confronting Saddam is not a distraction from the broader war on terrorism.

"Iraq could decide on any given day to provide biological or chemical weapons to a terrorist group or to individual terrorists," Cheney said. "The war on terror will not be won until Iraq is completely and verifiably deprived of weapons of mass destruction."

Yet there also were signs that Bush would be patient.

White House press secretary Ari Fleischer (news - web sites) said the Iraqi declaration "begins the process" under which inspectors will determine whether it is accurate. Privately, White House officials said they do not expect Bush to take immediate action against Saddam after the deadline, even if Iraq claims not to have weapons of mass destruction.

Instead, the United States will work to help inspectors prove deceptions, officials said.

While putting the onus on Saddam, Bush seemed to set limits on the authority of U.N. inspectors.

"Inspectors do not have the duty or the ability to uncover terrible weapons hidden in a vast country," he said. "The responsibility of inspectors is simply to confirm the evidence of voluntary and total disarmament."

"It is Saddam Hussein who has the responsibility to provide that evidence as directed and in full. Any act of delay, deception or defiance will prove that Saddam Hussein has not adopted the path of compliance and has rejected the path of peace," he said.

In London, one of Bush's most hawkish advisers tried to assure wary allies that the president wants to disarm Saddam without a fight.

"Our only hope ... of achieving the peaceful outcome is if we can confront the Iraqi regime with a credible threat of force behind our diplomacy," said Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz at the International Institute of Strategic Studies, an independent think tank.

Even as he spoke of the desire to avoid war, Wolfowitz met privately with Iraqi opposition leaders who could help the United States build a post-Saddam Iraq.

Also looking ahead — and addressing criticism that he has not outlined plans for the country after Saddam's ouster — Bush announced later Monday that his special envoy to Afghanistan (news - web sites) will also now serve as in the same role and as ambassador-at-large for "Free Iraqis." In that post, Zalmay Khalilzad will serve as the main U.S. contact and coordinator for the Iraqi opposition and will oversee Bush's preparations for Iraq after Saddam.

The Afghan-born Khalilzad will continue his work helping Afghanistan rebuild and reaching out to the Muslim community on behalf of the White House.

But Khalilzad, who previously held posts in the Defense and State departments and has played a key behind-the-scenes role in the war on terrorism, will relinquish his job as head of the National Security Council's Southwest Asia, Near East and North African affairs office.

97 posted on 12/02/2002 8:06:32 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Are you Episcopalian?
98 posted on 12/02/2002 9:28:36 PM PST by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
The speech was written months ago.
99 posted on 12/02/2002 9:56:32 PM PST by Be active
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
I am suprised this thread doesn't have more activity.
100 posted on 12/02/2002 10:46:07 PM PST by bonfire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson