Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dan from Michigan; Illbay; All
Absolutely.

Prohibition didn't work in the 20's, and it is also a miserable failure today. Anyone who thinks that the 21 drinking age does anything except line the pockets of local and state law enforcement agencies with underage drinking ticket revenues is a complete and total moron.

I don't care what the repercussions on the highways are, you do what is right, not what makes you feel safe.

Telling a 19 or 20 year old that if he drinks a beer he is a criminal is ludicrous, statist, and immoral.

50 posted on 11/29/2002 1:02:29 PM PST by GunRunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: GunRunner
During Prohibition...
The economy soared, ie "The Roaring Twenties"
Admissions to mental hospitals were cut by 75%.
Admissions to emergency rooms were down 50%.
Church attendance as a percent of the population hit all time record highs.
Divorces were down.
I read a whole book on the positives during prohibition.
It was nothing like the total failure you have been led to believe.
61 posted on 11/29/2002 3:14:58 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: GunRunner
For what it's worth, my two cents is that if someone has a high school diploma they ought to be able to drink. There is enormous pressure on every college campus simply due to the two different populations due to the age "21". I accept that there will be more traffic deaths, etc., and that is unfortunate, but death is part of our existence here.
104 posted on 11/30/2002 1:09:31 AM PST by AFPhys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson