Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freeper Gets Bill From Planned Parenthood for $77,000!!!
This came in the U.S. Mail | November 27, 2002 | Saundra Duffy

Posted on 11/27/2002 2:04:01 PM PST by Saundra Duffy

How would you like to go to your mail box and receive a legal document that says you owe Planned Parenthood $77,000? As some of you may recall, three of us plaintiffs sued Planned Parenthood with the hope we could force them to tell the truth about the link between abortion and breast cancer. Go to www.AbortionBreastCancer.com for more info about the ABC Link. The press release announcing the lawsuit is below. Legal expertise for our case was provided by Thomas More Law Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan. The first round was lost by us and the Judge ordered us three poor women to pay PP legal fees, hence this disgusting "bill" from Planned Parenthood. Good news is that our attorneys are appealing. That's where we are now. Here's the news release about the lawsuit:

Women's Group Lauds Abortion-Breast Cancer Suit Against Planned Parenthood August 17, 2001

The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer announced that a lawsuit was filed yesterday in a San Diego court by three California women against Planned Parenthood Federation of America and its affiliate, Planned Parenthood of San Diego and Riverside Counties. The suit accuses Planned Parenthood of having mislead women about the safety of abortion. Research published over nearly a half of a century has linked the procedure with increased breast cancer risk. The incidence of breast cancer among American women has climbed 40% in the last quarter of a century since the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion. The incidence of all other cancers has declined in the U.S. over the same period.

The plaintiffs, Agnes Bernardo of Chula Vista, Pamela Colip of Loma Linda, and Sandra Duffy-Hawkins of Sacramento, are not demanding monetary damages, but they are demanding Planned Parenthood to provide women with accurate information about the overwhelming evidence that abortion raises breast cancer risk. The plaintiffs are represented by the Thomas More Law Center located in Ann Arbor, Michigan.

A 1996 review and meta-analysis of the studies found that induced abortion raises a woman’s breast cancer risk by 30%. The leading author of that paper written in collaboration with scientists from Penn State College of Medicine, Professor Joel Brind of Baruch College of the City University of New York, has written extensively about an ongoing effort by scientists to cover-up the research. [Brind et al. (1996) J Epidemiol Community Health 50:481-96]

In the only study specifically commissioned by the National Cancer Institute, Dr. Janet Daling and her colleagues at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center reported that “Among women who had been pregnant at least once, the risk of breast cancer in those who had experienced an induced abortion was 50% higher than among other women.” [Daling et al. (1994) J Natl Cancer Inst 86:1584-92]

The only statistically significant prospective study (one based on medical records, not interviews and which, therefore, rules out any possibility of recall bias) was conducted in New York and found a 90% increased risk. [Howe et al. (1989) Int J Epidemiol 18:300-4]

The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer provides a wealth of information about the research, public policy and women’s legal rights at www.abortionbreastcancer.com.

Karen Malec, president of the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer, reported that “Twenty-eight out of 37 studies published since 1957 have associated this elective surgical procedure with breast cancer. We applaud the efforts of the Thomas More Law Center to assist women. Women have a right to make fully informed decisions concerning their own health. If a women are denied crucial information about the risks of a procedure, can it really be said that a choice ever belonged to them? Accurate information about the research has been censored by Planned Parenthood and its supporters since abortion was legalized in the U.S. nearly three decades ago. It was censored by the same people who ardently professed that they cared about women’s health. Planned Parenthood’s greed will cost women their lives and devastate families. This is a travesty of justice.”

The Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer is an international women’s organization founded to protect the health and save the lives of women by educating and providing information on abortion as a risk factor for breast cancer.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: abclink; abortion; breastcancer; plannedparenthood
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-196 next last
To: Saundra Duffy
Any chance of actually posting the judge's ruling so that the legal types out here could see what is really going on/critique it?
101 posted on 11/27/2002 4:22:40 PM PST by TheConservator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
The plaintiffs, Agnes Bernardo of Chula Vista, Pamela Colip of Loma Linda, and Sandra Duffy-Hawkins

I just realized THEY MISSPELLED MY NAME in this news release. It's "SaUndra". Oh, well, that's the least of my worries. Have a great Thanksgiving Day, FReeper pals. For victory & freedom!!!

102 posted on 11/27/2002 4:23:58 PM PST by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
One person's frivilous lawsuit is another's cause. It cuts both ways.
103 posted on 11/27/2002 4:24:33 PM PST by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservator
Any chance of actually posting the judge's ruling so that the legal types out here could see what is really going on/critique it?

It's pretty lengthy. I'll see what I can do. Basically, the judge says we're full of crap in legaleze. LOL! For victory & freedom!!!

104 posted on 11/27/2002 4:25:46 PM PST by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: DaGman
One person's frivilous lawsuit is another's cause. It cuts both ways.

Are you saying we have a frivolous lawsuit? Ack!! It was supposed to be about consumer rights. I never understood how Planned Parenthood was allowed to turn this around to make it about abortion. Go figure. Why is it controversial to INFORM women consumers about the existence of the ABC Link?

105 posted on 11/27/2002 4:28:52 PM PST by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
pated = payed

Honey, it would have been better to leave that one alone. The word you're wanting to use there is "paid".

106 posted on 11/27/2002 4:29:41 PM PST by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
The two other women who have homes, need to contact their homeowners insurance company. The company may be able to assist by providing legal counsel. Just a thought.
107 posted on 11/27/2002 4:33:06 PM PST by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronjon
I would gladly watch their clinics burn and their children die from the Clap than give P.P. one red cent.
108 posted on 11/27/2002 4:36:10 PM PST by Right Brigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: The Other Harry
The word you're wanting to use there is "paid".

Yeah, I know, but I didn't want the FReeper to feel bad. By the way, why isn't it spelled PAYED, anyway. Makes more sense. For victory & freedom!!!

109 posted on 11/27/2002 4:39:42 PM PST by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger
The two other women who have homes, need to contact their homeowners insurance company. The company may be able to assist by providing legal counsel. Just a thought.

Well, that's interesting. I'll pass it on. Thanks for your concern! For victory & freedom!!!

110 posted on 11/27/2002 4:40:54 PM PST by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Dont fool yourself. Courts are nothing but politics and opinions and most court opinions and rulings go the way the money goes.There is nothing firm when it come to courts and lawyers.
111 posted on 11/27/2002 4:43:10 PM PST by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
It will be OVER MY DEAD BODY that I give one red cent of my precious hard-earned $ to the likes of Planned Parenthood. I'd rather go to jail and I'm not kidding!

You, dear lady, are truly a modern martyr in this battle to defend God's youngest children. Your willingness to sacrifice your earthly belongings and even your freedom is an inspiration to the less courageous masses (myself included)!

112 posted on 11/27/2002 4:44:59 PM PST by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
By the way, why isn't it spelled PAYED, anyway?

I'll be prepared to answer that just as soon as you can tell me why "would" is pronounced "wud".

113 posted on 11/27/2002 4:47:55 PM PST by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Saundra, you go girl! Thanks for all you do.
114 posted on 11/27/2002 4:48:25 PM PST by cfrels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: The Other Harry
just as soon as you can tell me why "would" is pronounced "wud".

Wye knot? Aren't they're too weighs to misspell everything two bee Miss Understood ?

Justice soon as eye wood spell it easier the udder weigh?

115 posted on 11/27/2002 4:57:53 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Counter-sue Planned Parenthood and their attorneys for harrassment and emotional distresses. Be sure to cry a lot.
116 posted on 11/27/2002 5:04:08 PM PST by Tall_Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Wye knot? Aren't they're too weighs to misspell everything two bee Miss Understood ?

You got me laffing with that. ;)

117 posted on 11/27/2002 5:08:32 PM PST by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom
Hugs and kisses to you, too, sweetikins.
118 posted on 11/27/2002 5:24:28 PM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
God is not mocked.
119 posted on 11/27/2002 5:50:31 PM PST by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
There are churches who are now doing a 12 step program helping women who have had abortions as long ago as twenty years, and as recent as last year, to come to terms with the depression they are enduring because of the guilt from killing their own child. It IS a child, it is not a choice. I had a miscarriage in 1978 and it took YEARS just for me to get over that depression! Intentionally killing your own unborn child must be devestating for the woman. In the 12 step program it ends with a trip to a cemetary for a "funeral" for the child. I don't know anyone who ever had an abortion without intense guilt and depression for years afterward. On the other hand, I have never known anyone who was sorry they decided to have their child and raise it.
Go to:
http://www.abortionismurder.com
120 posted on 11/27/2002 5:51:38 PM PST by buffyt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson