Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Loss Of Major Hub Cities Could Cripple Internet, Study Suggests
Ohio State University ^ | 11-26-2002

Posted on 11/26/2002 7:41:37 AM PST by blam

Source: Ohio State University
Date: 11/26/2002

Loss Of Major Hub Cities Could Cripple Internet, Study Suggests

COLUMBUS, Ohio – A terrorist attack or other disaster that destroyed key telecommunications equipment in major cities would disrupt the Internet much like severe storms at airline hubs ties up the nation's air traffic, a new study suggests. Researchers at Ohio State University conducted experiments in which they simulated what would happen if a disaster crippled major nodes of the Internet – places that house the equipment where Internet traffic is collected and distributed.

The results showed that major cities that serve as Internet nodes would continue to have network access in most scenarios, although it would probably be much less functional. But smaller and medium sized cities that link to the Internet through these major hub cities could be disconnected from the entire network.

"The Internet functions much like our air traffic system," said Tony Grubesic, who co-authored the study as a doctoral student in geography at Ohio State. "If weather stops or delays traffic in a major airport hub, like Chicago's O'Hare, air passengers throughout the country may feel the effects – even if they are not traveling to Chicago. The same is true of the Internet hubs. They can affect Internet traffic through much of the country."

Grubesic, who is now an assistant professor of geography at the University of Cincinnati, conducted the study with Morton O'Kelly, professor, and Alan Murray, an associate professor, both in geography at Ohio State.

Their results appear in the February 2003 issue of the journal Telematics and Informatics.

The Internet has become more vulnerable in recent years as it has become more commercialized, Grubesic said. The earliest predecessor to the commercial Internet of today was ARPANET, a computer network developed by the Department of Defense. It was designed specifically to withstand a nuclear attack by having a decentralized network, meaning there were many routes to and from each point on the network.

But that decentralized network is expensive to build and maintain, Grubesic said. As the Internet has become commercialized, the major network providers have moved toward a "hub-and-spoke" model that funnels Internet connections through major hub cities.

"If you would pick up an octopus, all of its tentacles would come up with it," O'Kelly said. "The major Internet nodes have tentacles that connect to many other cities. If you destroyed a major Internet hub, you would also destroy all the links that are connected to it. It would have ripple effects throughout the Internet."

The biggest impact would be felt in the small and medium-size cities whose only or main connections to the Internet come through the major hub cities. Larger cities often have multiple connections to the Internet in and out of the city and would be harder to completely disconnect from the Internet.

The actual impact of a network disruption would depend on a variety of factors, such as the cities affected by the disruption. Grubesic said the most severe impacts would occur if telecommunications equipment were destroyed in the six largest Internet hubs: Los Angeles, New York, Atlanta, Dallas, Chicago, and Washington, DC.

For example, Los Angeles is a major hub location connecting other large cities in the South and West. If Los Angeles were eliminated as a node on the Internet, many other cities in California may not have Internet access. But it would also hurt Internet accessibility in Las Vegas, Phoenix, Tucson, Denver, Dallas and Houston, the study suggests.

A relevant glimpse of what could happen with the loss of a major Internet hub occurred with the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attack in New York City, Grubesic said. One major telecommunication hub was located at Ground Zero, and the loss of that hub disconnected three New York counties from the state of New York's computer system. In addition, several major Internet services and e-business providers were left without service for nearly two days.

Grubesic noted that there are more than 40 network provider companies that make up the backbone of the Internet. Many of these companies have agreements to help distribute each other's Internet traffic, which would help if one company's equipment was destroyed in a disaster. Still, most of the companies have hubs in the same cities and a major disaster could destroy the infrastructure of multiple networks.

For that reason, Grubesic said networks should not be concentrated too much in major cities.

"The ability for networks to re-route, re-connect and have redundancy is clearly important for the survival of the Internet in the face of disasters," Grubesic said. "That's why a more decentralized Internet had advantages over a hub-and-spoke model."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued for journalists and other members of the public. If you wish to quote any part of this story, please credit Ohio State University as the original source. You may also wish to include the following link in any citation:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2002/11/021126072153.htm


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cities; cripple; hub; internet; loss; major; study
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
I read some time back that there were 13 major server connections/locations worldwide and that one of the thirteen had been moved recently because it was to close to another. (I know very little about this subject)
1 posted on 11/26/2002 7:41:37 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: blam
This sounds like a dasshole plot to silence conservative critics and the DrudgeReport. ;-)
3 posted on 11/26/2002 7:44:43 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
But smaller and medium sized cities that link to the Internet through these major hub cities could be disconnected from the entire network.

Awww, Geee....we git that in northwest Rkansaw ever' month when Mammy Yokum hangs her wash out ta dry. Them thar telephone lines makes good clothes lines but plays havoc on the 'net connections.
4 posted on 11/26/2002 7:48:46 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Well, if the next attack chooses to cripple the internet temporarily rather than one of many other options, I'll say a thank you for small favors.
5 posted on 11/26/2002 7:51:55 AM PST by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Would this qualify as "Loose Lips Sink MIPS"?
6 posted on 11/26/2002 7:53:56 AM PST by TrappedInLiberalHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TrappedInLiberalHell
Good one! Actually, the internet can be brought down -- anything can be brought down. But the internet was designed by DARPA to survive nuclear war. It's constructed to find paths between points, even if some routes are blocked. You'd have more collisions and slower and more problematic connections, I suppose, but it would take a lot to really bring it down.

I would also say that the coordination on 9-11 was a rare feat. At this point, I'd be very surprised if 5 terrorist cells operating in the US could all work together to take out 5 hubs on the same day. And is 5 hubs enough? How many cells need to sabotage how many hubs? I don't see it happening.

7 posted on 11/26/2002 8:15:31 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam
I wonder where they got their information. AFAIK, there is no longer any central repository of engineering information about the internet. For example, there have been heated controversies about both the rate at which the Internet is growing and the fraction of Internet traffic carried by UUNET (and the ability of other carriers to service it if UUNET went dark due to Worldcom's bankruptcy).
8 posted on 11/26/2002 8:16:13 AM PST by Lessismore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
Yep. It'd be awful to have to wait longer to have the porn pix download.
9 posted on 11/26/2002 8:21:32 AM PST by commandante_zero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
There are thirteen critical servers I believe. The most recent attack (largest in history) took down eight and another 1 partially. There was little or no visible impact on the internet; however they said if the attack had lasted longer than an hour it would have started to slow down users. I believe some are even located outside of the country and their location is a closely guarded secret.
10 posted on 11/26/2002 8:40:00 AM PST by Naspino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Good one! Actually, the internet can be brought down -- anything can be brought down. But the internet was designed by DARPA to survive nuclear war. It's constructed to find paths between points, even if some routes are blocked. You'd have more collisions and slower and more problematic connections, I suppose, but it would take a lot to really bring it down.

Not to mention the information denisty is somewhat lower nowadays - more bytes must be moved to communicate a loosely written or a fancily designed Web page than just plain text.

11 posted on 11/26/2002 9:02:32 AM PST by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Naspino
The servers you refer to are the "root" DNS servers....

Their domains are the "top" level domain which is designated
as the "." domain...

12 posted on 11/26/2002 9:07:35 AM PST by JSpears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blam
Can't be entirely shut down, but a very few well-placed bombs could definitely BOG DOWN the internet for a while. They could also effectively deny service to millions of people for at least several days, maybe even several weeks or months. For example, I can think of one ISP with a very large number of customers that promotes itself by sending out a very large number of free CD-ROMS, and this ISP routes a large percentage of its traffic through a huge server facility just outside of the capital city of a large country. One well-placed bomb of sufficient explosive power could inconvenience a lot of people!
13 posted on 11/26/2002 9:13:55 AM PST by Stefan Stackhouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
If a major city was destroyed, the internet would be the least of our problems. If citizens fled cities, stopped working,anf the economy collapses, why is the internet so important?
14 posted on 11/26/2002 9:21:50 AM PST by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
If citizens fled cities, stopped working,anf the economy collapses, why is the internet so important?

Communications. Many people nowadays use the Internet to get their knowledge, and many businesses use the Internet for communication. If we're isolated (not a problem with ham radio, then we're likely to be more nervous than if we know what's going on.

15 posted on 11/26/2002 9:29:23 AM PST by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Stefan Stackhouse
I can think of one ISP with a very large number of customers that promotes itself by sending out a very large number of free CD-ROMS, and this ISP routes a large percentage of its traffic through a huge server facility just outside of the capital city of a large country. One well-placed bomb of sufficient explosive power could inconvenience a lot of people

If the above mentioned ISP was "taken out" IMHO only the teeny bopper crowd and their chat rooms would miss them ;-)

16 posted on 11/26/2002 9:29:52 AM PST by varon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Chemist_Geek
thanks for the ham radio thought. I was thinking the same thing. Good Old CB nation for short range would be a means of communication too.

Red

17 posted on 11/26/2002 9:57:39 AM PST by Conservative4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Chemist_Geek
Even HAM radio needs electricity. My main worry is the power plants all going down. Then everyone is screwed.

If a few nukes in cities go off, it might drain the system, cause enough chaos, and so on, to do it.

Who knows? It's not easy to be self sufficient when it comes to electricity.
18 posted on 11/26/2002 10:03:07 AM PST by Monty22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Chemist_Geek
I understand, but you mised my point. If a major US city was destroyed, the resulting panic and disruption to the economy would be so great that ant disruption to the internet would be minor in comparison.
19 posted on 11/26/2002 10:10:45 AM PST by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: blam
The Internet is fully redundant and without a single point of failure " - -

Also, the techno geeks have thought of this and a thousand other problems/situations..

And besides, the government doesn't run on the "public network" as we know it.. and the DARPA comments are right on..

Not only will it not work, but we would pinpoint the exact locaton of these idiot terriorist who believe this..

20 posted on 11/26/2002 10:11:25 AM PST by NoCalEyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson