Posted on 11/25/2002 6:49:01 AM PST by Notwithstanding
The New York Times doesn't actually come right out and say it, but ... its coverage ... reveals that... Landrieu is going to lose to GOP challenger Suzanne Terrell.
Exit polls on Election Day showed that voters in swing Senate races listed abortion as a major concern, with pro-lifers having the edge. In fact, those who cited abortion as their most important issue voted overwhelmingly for the pro-life candidate.
The Old Gray Lady, however, has been conspicuously silent on this trend. Typically Times editors highlight a candidate's pro-life stance only when that candidate is likely to lose.
Saturday's Times offered a comprehensive analysis of the Louisiana Senate race, contrasting the positions of Landrieu and Terrell her on everything from Iraq to funding for the Boy Scouts.
Yet nowhere in the paper's lengthy report did it get around to mentioning that Landrieu is pro-abortion while Terrell is pro-life.
Translation: The New York Times knows Suzanne Terrell is going to win.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
Kind of astounding. The Old Gray Whore nevers ceases to amaze in its disdain for journalistic integrity and its capacity for hypocrisy.
I talked to a fella from Mississippi who has a very dear lady friend in Louisiana. She tried and tried to call Landrieu's office on a very serious personal matter. She was treated very rudely when she could even get thru to talk to a staffer.
She vowed to go out of her way to NOT VOTE for Mary, and to encourage her friends and relatives to do the same. I could see the coldness in Mary Landrieu on the Meet the Press "debate". I suppose her office reflects her attitude, to her detriment.
g
Louisiana may be ready to lead the nation now, in both parties, lead it back to open religious faith and Christianity, and repentance for its baby-killing.
Also remember, God likes to bring down the prideful and arrogant, and let the poor and downtrodden have a chance in the sun.
"The stone that the builders rejected, has become the head corner stone..."
The Clintonites deserve to be politically destroyed. ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and the NYT, and their corporate foundations and subsidiaries, are an evil political cabal. F'em all.
Terrell has not closed the sale on this.
I agree. Despite recent good news from polling data, this remains a cliff-hanger. I don't know anything about the state of LA. What's the outlook for RAT election fraud in that state?
There are a few posters at DU who understand that pro-abortion zealotry will never translate into a mandate-winnning issue for the democrats. But the "stick-scissors-in-the-head-and-twist" frothers just scream them down.
The pro-abortion democrat frothers are cut from the same bolt of cloth as the pro-dope libertarians. They are one issue screamers and pouters whose shrillness is compromising their respective party's long term health.
District of Columbia law code name Ann
Requires Acrobat Reader
Landrieu needs to be asked her opinion of gun ownership. That'll kill her if she gives an honest answer.
I'm not sure what the forum was but in today's USA today, the paper reprots that Landrieu literally threatened Terrell after the debate was over. Landrieu was reported to have said "This will be your last campaign"
Terrell said "She threatened me".
Landrieu's response was "It was a prediction, not a threat".
I would love to see Landrieu go down, particularly in light of rumors that she stole her last election.
This is terrible analysis by Newsmax. Absolutely pathetic, and if its thinking like this on election day, than its Landreau who will win. First, of all, national security and the war on terrorism are the number one concern of voters, especially swing voters. Sure, getting out the pro-lifers is a good "strategery", but please don't kid yourself that the Nov. 5th election was about abortion. Even in the south, people like Saxby Chambliss won because they pointed out that people like Max Cleland voted like Greens on national defense.
MARY LANDRIEU = DEM LADY A RUIN
You have any links to this recent polling data? If so could you share them? Thanks
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.