Skip to comments.
U.S., Mexican legislators discuss border vigilantes - States may stop groups targeting illegals
Associated Press ^
| November 24, 2002
| Associated Press Staff
Posted on 11/24/2002 2:06:29 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
U.S., Mexican legislators discuss border vigilantes
States may take action against groups that target migrants
11/24/2002
Associated Press
NUEVO LAREDO, Mexico - U.S. and Mexican lawmakers expressed concern Saturday about a growing number of American vigilante groups that capture and sometimes hurt or kill Mexican migrants who cross into the United States illegally.
The fringe groups have sprung up in several border towns in Arizona, New Mexico and Texas, where residents frustrated by U.S. border agents' inability to stop illegal migration have taken matters into their own hands, said Arizona state Rep. Robert Cannell.
Mr. Cannell said Arizona legislators will likely take up the issue of vigilante groups during the state's next legislative session. The Democrat said he was "strongly opposed" to the groups.
Mr. Cannell was one of eight U.S. state legislators - three from New Mexico, two from California, two from Arizona, and one from Texas - who joined 38 lawmakers from the six Mexican border states at the third annual legislative border forum in Nuevo Laredo.
In separate Binational Commission meetings on Monday and Tuesday in Mexico City, high-ranking U.S. officials, including Secretary of State Colin Powell, will hold talks with their Mexican counterparts on what to do about the estimated 3 million Mexicans working illegally in the United States.
New Mexico state Sen. Mary Jane Garcia said vigilante groups appeal to undereducated young men who feel that state and federal governments haven't done enough to protect towns along the border. The Democrat said the issue also needed urgent attention in the New Mexico legislature.
Also on Saturday, Chihuahua state lawmaker Cesar Castro Lopez called on investigators from the FBI and Britain's Scotland Yard to help solve the brutal slayings of women in Ciudad Juarez.
More than 75 women have been raped and killed since 1993 in Ciudad Juarez, the border's largest city. Dozens of suspects have been arrested, but bodies have continued to turn up in the desert.
Mr. Castro Lopez said that Mexican state and federal commissions assigned to investigate the crimes have failed to produce any concrete leads.
"It has become a financial issue of vital importance for those who do business on the border," he said, adding that violence in Juarez has begun to affect U.S. commercial interests, thus ensuring that the killings fall under U.S. jurisdiction.
The killings have "ruined the reputation of Ciudad Juarez in the eyes of the world," Mr. Castro Lopez said.
Online at: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dallas/tsw/stories/112402dntexvigilantes.b2a17.html
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Mexico; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona; US: California; US: New Mexico; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: banglist; ccrm; illegalimmigrants; vigilantegroups
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 181-189 next last
To: RKV
re:
"..
If you change the citizenship laws so that birth here by non-citizens does not
convey citizenship you might get some takers to such a plan. Add the ability to
deny publically funded services to non-citzens and you would get some more.
End welfare and you might even get my vote......"
Absolutely. Only citizens should receive dollars contributed by other citizens
to our tax base, not non-citizens. That has got to stop.
Unless you can convince Americans to work for less and able us to provide
inexpensive items to sell, we need those willing to work for low wages. The
working "illegal immigrant" provides that. Let 'em work and leave on a daily
basis, but let's stop the free ride.
121
posted on
11/24/2002 3:18:16 PM PST
by
Deep_6
To: MeeknMing
Yes, But its mostly a financial issue. Get ready for a shake down. More money and less to show for it. Maybe if they try comming here by legal means they wouldn't have to worry about it and just maybe if these were not criminals Americans would not have to form vigilante groupes.
To: BlackElk
You ought to cut back on the coffee a pot or two and just skip the LSD altogether.
To: MeeknMing
Letter from the president: "As my Administration seeks to improve the system that welcomes legal immigrants, The United States must also continue its efforts to combat illegal immigration." It goes on to mention adding more border agents and strenghtening laws.
To: BlackElk
You never know. Those rednecks can be very clever. They may be sneaking across the border at night to dump the bodies. If he is sufficiently armed, an American can go anywhere he wants to go.On second thought, double your LSD dose. Where you there is no coming back from. Trip on, dood!
To: BlackElk
Where you are there is no coming back from.
(Oh well, you can't read anyway so what's the difference.)
To: DoughtyOne
Just so you know,
if we all used colors so our posts stood out, we might find none of them stood out at all. So then,
some would resort to other methods to make sure everyone saw what they had to say. For instance,
some would resort to all bold face test. Others would go to ALL CAPS BUT WOULD SOON BE TOLD TO STOP IT BECAUSE IT IS CONSIDERED
YELLING AND
RUDE. Okay they would say,
I won't use ALL CAPS, instead,
I'll just use a larger type face,
italic even. And oh what a mess that would become. And it all started with
someone that thought they would try to have
their message stand out not for its content but instead by making it - and all of us -
blue. Best Regards, BJN
To: BJungNan
Freedom is just so messy isn't it? FReepers have been free to post in any manner they want for quite a long time now and it still seems to me to be working.
FReedom! Gotta love it! ; )
To: BlackElk
I was thinking more of mobs who take the perp from the law and hang them, but Merriam-Webster defines it as:
Main Entry: vig·i·lan·te
Pronunciation: "vi-j&-'lan-tE
Function: noun
Etymology: Spanish, watchman, guard, from vigilante vigilant, from Latin vigilant-, vigilans
Date: 1865
: a member of a volunteer committee organized to suppress and punish crime summarily (as when the processes of law appear inadequate); broadly : a self-appointed doer of justice
- vig·i·lan·tism /-'lan-"ti-z&m/ noun
Since the LAW is not doing it's duty, I can support vigilantism.
To: TigersEye
That's exactly what I said!
To: DoughtyOne
This border mess just gets wierder and wierder.It's volatile.
To: BJungNan
Is it? I guess I didn't see it with all those colors swirling around in my head. ; )
To: BJungNan
Oh you... (smile>
To: Joe Hadenuf
It should get real interesting in the next six months to a year.
Comment #135 Removed by Moderator
To: BlueJambi
Perhaps you would be so kind as to point out which article of the Constitution or Bill of Rights that defines our national language?
Then perhaps you can point out which section defines our national culture?
The problem for you is that the Constitution does not define a national language or a national culture. It does not say that a "citizen" who speaks Spanish and observes Mexican traditions is any less "American" that a "citizen" who speaks "English" and observes Irish customs.
That might have something to do with the fact that so many of our first citizens spoke different languages and followed diverse social and religious cultures and customs.
To: Sabertooth
If American politicians and bureaucrats truly want to discourage vigilantism, they should cease and desist their own ongoing and bipartisan malfeasance with regard to Illegal Aliens. American politicians aren't hiring with the gusto that American people are hiring.
Cause and effect.
Chasing the effect is stupid. Just ask Buchanan. (and Tancredo very soon.)
137
posted on
11/24/2002 9:56:38 PM PST
by
PRND21
To: madfly
With photo evidence of all encounters, it will be hard for our "Lawmakers" to keep up these claims of injury and murder being committed by these fine people. Thanks for the account of what you saw on the feed. Very interesting. Where can this be viewed? I heard they were setting up a live link. Thanks.
To: philetus
If you should be so rash as to personally participate in vigilateism so defined, be prepared for jail and for paying from your own pocket (since insurance companies do not cover wilfull violations of criminal laws) the damages levied in the civil suits.
To: hove
Actually, there is always prosecutorial discretion as to ANY violation of the law. If the government can nolle or dismiss homicide charges, it can ignore border-jumping. In fact, you can bet it will.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 181-189 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson