Posted on 11/20/2002 2:40:24 PM PST by DKNY
WASHINGTON, DC (November 20, 2002) The most recent report by the Institute for Womens Policy Research (IWFPR), ranking the best and worst states for women, amounts to little more than looking for discrimination in all the wrong places, says Nancy M. Pfotenhauer, president of the Independent Womens Forum.
The state-by-state analysis is a clever ploy to make it appear that women are worse off than men across the country. The reports findings claim that women earn less, are seriously underrepresented in political office, and make up disproportionate share of those in poverty.
However, their methodology for assessing the economic well-being is flawed. It fails to take into account important factors such as age, education, and consecutive years in the workplace. Today, similarly qualified men and women earn the same wages. In fact, as a study by the Employment Policy Foundation (EPF) reveals, women sometimes out-earn their male counterparts. Examining data from the Current Population Survey, EPF found that single women who live alone and have full-time jobs earn 28 cents more than similarly situated men.
The average wages of women may be lower than those of men because a woman is more likely to choose a lower-paying job that provides flexibility to combine work and family responsibilities. This is not discrimination this is women choosing what works best for themselves and their families.
IWPR goes on to complain that the proportion of state legislators who are women grew only slightly, calling this disappointing.
Here, IWPR is guilty of confusing equal opportunity with equal results. In the most recent issue of our magazine, The Womens Quarterly, polling expert Karlyn Bowman reports that the success rate of male and female candidates nationwide are virtually identical, notes Pfotenhauer.
In reality, whether it be in finances, politics, or education where women now earn the majority of bachelors and masters degrees women are not victims. And most women reject this view. Unfortunately, groups like these, who purport to speak on behalf of all women, still dont get it.
Adds Pfotenhauer, By creating criteria for ranking states designed to support radical feminist views of women as victims, the IWPR ignores the fact that real life is giving women what they need: genuine choices and equal opportunity
For more information on the wage gap, check out Think You Know about the Wage Gap? Think Again: Myth vs. Fact.
The Independent Womens Forum, founded in 1992, is a non-profit, nonpartisan educational organization.
Thanks.
I have been suspicious of these claims that women earn far less than men for sometime. My wife has consistently earned more money than I have for the entire 13 years that we have been married. Now to a certain degree that can be attributed to the fact that she has been in the Fortune 500 world longer than I have, I spent several years working in small business before I stated working in the corporate world.
But over that last 5-8 years I have run into many professional men who claim that their wives earn more than they do. To a certain degree, I have been attributing this to a potential regional difference and that maybe in some parts of the country there is a disparity in wages between men and women. However, in the last few years I have seen this occur so many times that the only conclusion that I can now come to is that the wage disparity myth is just that, a myth.
Someone should tell NOW that there are only 50 states!
So why are we still here???... LOL.
WOO HOO my home state (MS) is considered the WORST!! Looks like the Feminizis don't like the Deep South! All the more reason to move back there!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.