Posted on 11/18/2002 7:02:19 PM PST by az4vlad
Liberals are wary of Bill O'Reilly's success with the O'Reilly Factor, and they should be. O'Reilly is influencing an important and massive demographic - TV watchers. Unlike most conservative pundits and politicians, O'Reilly appeals to all types of people with his honest, straight talk approach and slight independent streak. Consequently, he is tremendously popular. He is perhaps the first conservative TV pundit to attract as many viewers as some of the dominant liberal pundits and news hosts. His show currently averages 1.9 million viewers a night, more than Larry King Live, and is still the No. 1-rated cable news show. Although CBS Evening News with Dan Rather has under eight million viewers per evening, considering that around forty percent of households do not have cable or satellite and that some cable markets do not carry Fox News, O'Reilly's numbers are pretty impressive.
O'Reilly's level of popularity on mainstream television frightens the Left, because until now, television viewers had generally been considered their territory. The Right had been relegated to talk radio, small newspapers, and magazines. Then the Internet emerged as a popular forum for news and opinion and along came Fox news. Fox not only rejected the dominant liberal approach of the other networks but told viewers that it was "fair and balanced" news * essentially allowing it to capture vast middle America in addition to the Right wing. The rise of Fox News paved the way for O'Reilly: as people discovered that the major networks * whom they had trusted over the years to be fair arbiters of the news - were all inherently biased, they realized they may as well listen to someone who did not try to mince words or present only one side of the story.
O'Reilly's willingness to invite guests on his show whose opinions are diametrically opposed to his, while maintaining a reporter's news presence, is part of the key to his success. Unlike primetime evening news, he fairly includes radical opinions from both the Left and the Right, as well as minority views along the political spectrum. Unlike other political debate shows, he keeps the forum tightly wrapped so the show does not disintegrate into chaos making it difficult to follow or clearly hear any one person speaking. And like the primetime news shows, he covers most of the current and important political issues on each show.
Another reason O'Reilly is successful is because of his frank honesty. O'Reilly does not read lines that the network instructs him to read on a teleprompter, nor does he form his opinions based on large sums of cash donated to him by special interest groups or by loyalty to any particular political party. Although he is accused by the Left of being a typical conservative, O'Reilly has plenty of views that are not conservative. He supports gun control, is in favor of campaign finance reform and a patient's bill of rights, and is against the death penalty.
O'Reilly tends to say what people are intuitively thinking, not what esoterically sounds good, makes the network look good, or is the politically correct position. For example, although it might sound good in theory, and appear enlightened and polite to say that people should have the right to do whatever they want to do, O'Reilly will point out that what some people do is actually quite reprehensible and should be discouraged. After all, most people deep down believe there are certain moral responsibilities, and would rather agree, if secretly, with O'Reilly's statements to that effect, rather than with the platitudes and moral relativism that the mainstream media glosses its coverage with. To be fair, O'Reilly will invite the defenders of the reprehensible to appear on his show to refute him.
Although his new radio show, the Radio Factor, has not done as well as expected, this may in part be due to the format of talk radio. Most talk radio listeners are very conservative and only listen to talk radio in their car to and from work, or while driving during work. In that semi-stressful environment where the driver must put most of his or her concentration on the road, drivers would rather listen to drawling, encouraging, empathetic talk than ponder the weighty and frequently contrarian views that O'Reilly presents.
What is sure, though, is that O'Reilly has cornered a significant segment of the American population, and is influencing them. What nobody has bothered to say but what scares the Left is the obvious - Bush probably would not have won the election if there were no O'Reilly, and the Republicans did well in this fall's elections because of O'Reilly. O'Reilly's fatherly, knowing, comfortable tone is winning over middle America viewers just like Walter Cronkite did years ago. Except O'Reilly is winning them over to a strongly partisan position - the moral and intuitive position, not the left-leaning position shared by the major media.
I can't bear to listen to him for more than 20 seconds once a week.
What in the world makes this author think O'Reilly is conservative? I don't see it.
Re-think the sentence, cause if you think about Bill you'll know!!
But despite that, he addresses issues and topics in a way that no one else can or will; and that 'wind' he blows, knock many right off their complacent behinds. . .
. . .and that is good!
O'Reilly's views are fluff. Give me Rush, Hugh Hewitt, Ken Hamblin, Walter Williams, or Tony Snow anyday. Our radio station replaced Hugh with the Radio Factor. What a letdown. There's no meat to the show, no intelligence, not even any entertainment. I quit listening to O'Reilly the bore and the liberal witch he has with him. Now, I crank up good CD instead.
Hannity and his radio show reaches 10.5 million listeners. Rush Limbaugh and his show reaches 14.5 million listeners. In most areas you can get 10 or 20 radio stations. Now in most markets there are 70 TV stations. A national radio show reaching 1.9 million listeners would not make the top ten. For example Imus reaches 4.5 million. There are a bunch of shows at 3 to 4 million. Rush is number one with 14.5 million.
Conservative talk radio is a huge force. It is a much bigger force than news talk TV. But the media elites don't see it. They see Donahue with 390 thousand and think O'Reilly is a huge force at 1.9 million. Bigger names will go on Imus than go on O'Reilly. Imus has at least twice the impact with 4.5 million people. Rush rarely does guests. But Hannity does. Look for the Hannity influence to really grow in the coming months. He is still new and his audience is not yet common knowledge.
Rush is distributed by Clear Channel. They own 1200 radio stations. Rush is on about half of them.
Hannity is distributed by ABC and is on the ABC owned an operated stations, but not hardly any clear Channel Stations. So Hannity is reduced to lesser stations in most markets below the top 10. It blows my mind that Hannity has 2/3 the audience of Rush with a much weaker station line up. think talk radio is changing America in a way that Rather, Brokaw or Jennings never could.
Donahue is toast. I look for GE to sell MSNBC if it does not do better and soon. I can't imagine worse management than MSNBC unless it is ABC. Stephy is bombing on This Week. How anyone could fail to anticipate that is beyond me. It would be very interesting if Clear Channel bought MSNBC. They would likely take a typical Clear Channel radio station approach and Fox would be number 2 before you could say Roger Ailes.
The left loves their feely-goody ways and can't take the direct facts that O'Reilly dishes out. IMMHO.
That said, I enjoy watching him because it is quite obvious that even when he is blatantly wrong, he is giving voice to his own opinion, and he is not afraid to invite even the most radical, controversial guests on his show to spar with.
I may be wrong on this but if people watch him nightly they soon begin to see him for the phoney he is.
1. That they are basicly honest and good people. 2. They really honestly believe in their position on the subject. 3. They really do care about people.4. They really are your friend and you really can count on them. 5. They'll respectfully confront you to your face and defend you behind your back.
These are the people you can have real good discussions with and when you get through, they are still your friend and your are still their's. When people like this get together it can be a learning experience for both especially over along period of years. I've lived long enough and have experienced enough to know, that 1. I can be wrong and 2. No matter how much I know there is a whole lot I don't know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.