Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/18/2002 7:57:31 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: governsleastgovernsbest
Not going to happen, my friend. Powell is an American hero, right or wrong, and a black American hero in a Republican administration.

Bush will not, repeat, not fire him, no matter what.

He might, however, make it extremely uncomfortable behind the scenes.
2 posted on 11/18/2002 8:01:13 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Come on, why would anyone believe anything written by Bob Woodward??? I haven't read a word of his latest trash and I don't plan to. I can form my own opinions of Colin Powell and anyone else without reading more fiction from the fevered imagination of Bob Woodward!
4 posted on 11/18/2002 8:06:47 AM PST by Dems_R_Losers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
The real news in this article is that David Frumm considers Bob Woodward's reporting to be accurate.
5 posted on 11/18/2002 8:06:50 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Question my source if you wish ... but Drudge had an article in which Bob Woodward gave voice to several thoughts that Condolesa Rice (appologies for misspelling) allegedly had, while she was watching TV alone. Wow ... Bob Woodward must be a fantastic reporter, reading minds of our country's highest officials; without even having to bother talking to them. With 'interviewing' skills such as this, I tend to dismiss his book as pure fiction.
6 posted on 11/18/2002 8:07:46 AM PST by Hodar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
He denigrates Rice, snidely observing that “she had had difficulties” keeping up with what Bush was doing.

This is hilarious. Everyone knows Condi is not the brightest banana in the bunch. Now we know that even Powell knows it! Ha ha ha!

8 posted on 11/18/2002 8:10:11 AM PST by Zviadist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
David Frum's credulity is showing. I don't doubt that Woodward found leakers at the State Department, which is a nest of liberals some of whom probably go all the way back to Harry Truman, and of which the latest layer consists of clintonoids. But it's extremely unlikely that any of this stuff came direct from Colin Powell, or that it accurately represents what he thinks.
11 posted on 11/18/2002 8:12:40 AM PST by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
My wife and I took the Acela train from Washington to New York City on Sunday morning. My wife, who is not quite so convinced of her personal invulnerability as I am, was more than a little disturbed by the total absence of any security procedures. The conductors barely glanced at our tickets; they never asked for any ID

Oh boo hoo hoo, I guess your sheep of a wife would be thrilled if our government issued Soviet internal passports, so that the authorities could keep track of her every movement. Unbelievable how quickly stupid Americans like this embrace authoritarianism.

12 posted on 11/18/2002 8:12:42 AM PST by Zviadist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
I'm interested to see the focus in many responses on Woodward's credibility or lack thereof.

Beyond the details from Woodward that Frum cites, I believe the record is fairly clear that, even dating back to his service to GWHB, Powell has been a relative dove, and one tending to pursue his own agenda.
13 posted on 11/18/2002 8:12:57 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
"In the Woodward piece, Powell scorns the president for his “Texas, Alamo macho.”

Did Woodward received this information from Powell's mouth or was it transferred via telepathy?
16 posted on 11/18/2002 8:19:57 AM PST by CaptainK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
I said it then and I'll say it again, you can't trust the judgement of an abortionphile. Ever. Period.
17 posted on 11/18/2002 8:20:40 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
National Review.

When it comes to believing the Bush Administration or the Washington Posts Woodward, NATIONAL REVIEWS SWEARS ALLEGIANCE to the proven LIAR BOB WOODWARD.

Typical.

In his book on Iran Contra Woodward claimed to have direct quotes from CIA director William Casey. At the date and time Woodward claimed to have interviewed Casey, Casey was comatose on his death bed in the intensive care ward at the hospital. NO VISITORS WERE ALLOWED.

Woodward is a proven liar. National Review believes Woodard. That tells you all you need to know about National Review.

My favorite issue of National Review was the issue just before the 1980 election. It went to great lengths to show how bad the Reagan campaign had been run. National Review predicted a great re-election victory for Jimmy Carter because of all the inept mistakes Reagan had made. Reagan won in a landslide of such proportions that Jimmy Carter conceded 10 minutes after the polls closed on the east coast.

Political Scientists have spent the years since 1980 studying the 1980 Reagan campaign. It is considered the best example of how to do it right.

National Reveiw has always been clueless.


19 posted on 11/18/2002 8:22:27 AM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Why are they even talking to the leech named Woodward?
23 posted on 11/18/2002 8:26:57 AM PST by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Firing Powell.....Ummm
All the "Powell's just a house nigger" people
will have to start their
"Powels being picked on as a minority" mantra.

The whores that they are..

26 posted on 11/18/2002 8:31:09 AM PST by hosepipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Please see my #25 and #30.
32 posted on 11/18/2002 8:45:43 AM PST by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Next to Chrissie Whitman who is totally devoid of any positive attributes, except possibly, Mr. Eisenberg's moneybags, Powell was clealy Bush's WORST choice.

He is a dangerous, subversive, self-serving, treacherous, backstabbing, vile fifth columnist.
35 posted on 11/18/2002 8:52:33 AM PST by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Powell was brought on board for the black vote in 2000
It really worked didn't it
Now Bush is stuck with him
46 posted on 11/18/2002 9:16:58 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
I never had a good feeling about Powell although before the president took office I was unable to put my finger on it. I have not changed my opinion of him.
55 posted on 11/18/2002 10:48:53 AM PST by sweetliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson