Posted on 11/17/2002 5:26:39 AM PST by GailA
Rename Civil War parks? It's time, says Bailey
By Blake Fontenay fontenay@gomemphis.com November 17, 2002
Many Memphians viewed last summer's heavyweight championship fight between Lennox Lewis and Mike Tyson as one of the city's crowning moments.
But for County Commission chairman Walter Bailey, the event also highlighted a major civic embarrassment.
Bailey said Lewis's attorney and some HBO officials were driving through downtown and spotted a monument dedicated to Confederate president Jefferson Davis.
"They thought that was a bit unbecoming," Bailey recalled. "That was sort of an awakening call."
That uncomfortable experience has prompted Bailey to begin some informal discussions about changing the names of three city parks dedicated to the Civil War: Confederate Park, where the Davis monument is located, nearby Jefferson Davis Park and Forrest Park in the medical center area.
So far, Bailey said he's met only with a few city leaders to gauge support for the potentially controversial idea.
Bailey said a public discussion of park renaming is probably premature, so he talked about it only reluctantly.
But he said the goal would be to remove some symbols of an era many Memphians would rather forget.
"Changes would be consistent with our efforts to become a world-class city," Bailey said. "These monuments are offensive to some people."
Many disagree with that view. In 1999, talk about removing the Civil War memorials from Confederate Park and converting it into a park for cancer survivors generated furious backlash from descendants of Confederate veterans and other Civil War history buffs.
The idea, proposed by former Park Commission chairman John Malmo, was eventually withdrawn.
Lee Millar, community affairs officer for the Sons of Confederate Veterans, predicted a similar outcry if Bailey and his friends move forward with a renaming proposal.
"I think their idea is absolutely ridiculous," Millar said. "Historians in the area and Southerners in the area will fight it bitterly."
Rather than get rid of Civil War historic sites, Millar said, the community should do more to promote them to tourists.
Millar said Civil War tourism is a lucrative industry in other states, particularly Virginia.
"What is Memphis doing to attract Civil War tourism? Nothing," said Millar, who is also president of the Forrest Historical Society. "People like learning about their history and their genealogy. We have 10 Civil War sites in Memphis, but most people can't name them because we don't promote them."
Those sites include the graves of several Civil War generals at Elmwood Cemetery, a downtown alley used by Union Gen. C. C. Washburn to escape from Confederate Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest in 1864, the Hunt-Phelan Home and Fort Pickering, Millar said.
Jefferson Davis Park was founded in 1930, and Forrest Park, burial site of the general and his wife, was founded in 1900. Although city records show a park was founded at the Confederate Park site in 1829, the property was completed as a Civil War memorial in 1908.
Sidney Chism, a local political activist and one of Bailey's confidants, said one of his big concerns is the renaming issue's potential for divisiveness.
"We've reached a crossroads where there's not as much tension between the races any more," Chism said. "I don't want to go back to that."
Chism said he and Bailey made plans to drum up support for the idea among City Council members. So far, though, Chism said, the reception hasn't been too good.
"I've talked to one or two legislators, and they've asked me not to get them involved," Chism said. "They were lukewarm to it. There were other items they thought were more important."
Mayor Willie Herenton, City Council chairman Rickey Peete and John Vergos, chairman of the council's parks committee, all declined to offer their opinions about Bailey's efforts.
Council member TaJuan Stout Mitchell said she wouldn't mind talking about the issue, if a proposal is submitted to the council.
"I will deal with it if I have to deal with it," Mitchell said. "I do see some merit in it. I don't think it would hurt to discuss it."
Gayle Rose, a local philanthropist whom Bailey also consulted, thinks one solution might be to broaden the discussion to ways to enhance the city's image.
Rose suggested recruiting a number of community leaders to participate in a comprehensive planning process to make the city's image appear more progressive.
"What kind of symbols are we sending to our citizens and to visitors?" Rose said. "Maybe it's time to look at that."
- Blake Fontenay:
529-2386
They got their butts whipped and were living under occupation. Yet, amazingly, no one blew themselves up aboard crowded steamboats or drove hijacked stagecoaches into buildings.
Well, it would be a long shot, but...
Perfect symbols for the NEW Memphis to show to the world.
This guy is probably offensive to a whole lot of people.
Do these nitwits realize that Forrest and his wife are buried there?
So, do they propose that their bodies be disinterred from their graves?
I suppose they could have a big party where they descrate the bones as part of the renaming ceremony? Maybe that would make them feel better?
Those people would be the scalawags, NAACP and yankee socialist transplants.
"The North, it seems, have no more objections to slavery than the South have..." John Stuart Mill, 1861.
"The Northern onslaught upon slavery was no more than a piece of specious humbug designed to conceal its desire for economic control of the Southern states." Charles Dickens, 1862.
But Lewis at least has the excuse that he's British. ;-)
Not that many Americans know who Oliver Cromwell was either.
Ahh, renaming of landmarks for political reasons ... where's that been done before? Leningrad (St. Petersburg) and Stalingrad (Tsaritsyn) anyone?
Another small step in the march towards Soviet America.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.