Skip to comments.
The Top 50 Diversity Employers 2002 Rankings
THE BLACK COLLEGIAN MAGAZINE ^
| 11/12/2002
Posted on 11/12/2002 7:39:48 PM PST by John Lenin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
To: John Lenin
Uh, I'm puzzled. If you weren't trying to draw attention to the "diversity" angle, why DID you post this article? Surely you're erudite enough to understand that "diversity" is simply a liberal code word for "anti-white, -hetero, -male, -Christian bigotry."
41
posted on
11/13/2002 3:32:46 PM PST
by
IronJack
To: IronJack
Surely you're erudite enough to understand that "diversity" is simply a liberal code word for "anti-white, -hetero, -male, -Christian bigotry."
Funny, I didn't think that when I read the article. Differnet strokes for different folks.
To: YoungKentuckyConservative
The company I work for switched to Merrill-Lynch to "manage" our 401K funds. Merrill-Lynch couldn't manage my kid's piggy bank. They suck! Our losses per quater on our statements is much worse that the stock market losses for the same period. They should be shut down for pretending to be a brokerage firm.
To: John Lenin
I hope to work for Goldman, or Lehman or Merril.
I'll stay away from CSFD First Boston though.
44
posted on
11/13/2002 6:40:07 PM PST
by
Clemenza
To: Sender
I would have put HP higher on the diversity list. I worked for them ...I also worked for HP. The company is still trading on the reputation it built in the 1970s -- but that HP is long gone. And that's why I am, too!
45
posted on
11/13/2002 7:11:02 PM PST
by
Schatze
To: John Lenin
So if minorities simply WANT to work for a company, it is considered "diverse"?
Words apparently mean nothing to journalists.
To: Tauzero
You oughta get that jerking knee looked at. Could be Parkinson's. Only after you wipe that footprint of yours off yer own forehead.
Snidely
To: Snidely Whiplash
Charming image, but I'm afraid it's been years since I've been able to get my foot anywhere near there. I see you're a bit more flexible, but be warned that frequent insertion of one's head there might ultimately result in the need for Depends undergarments.
48
posted on
11/13/2002 9:43:29 PM PST
by
Tauzero
To: John Lenin
This survey has nothing to do with reality; it merely measures the employment fantasies of black college students.
But then, since diversity is all about black fantasies, I guess this survey is acceptable as a scientific instrument.
49
posted on
11/14/2002 3:53:59 PM PST
by
mrustow
To: John Lenin
Read the article, it's not about affirmitive action, it's about who the students like best to work for. No comment on the obvious racism.I read the "article"; its title is, "The Top 50 Diversity Employers ..." To say "it's not about affirmative action" is tantamount to saying of a certain men's room fixture, "It's a pissoir, not a urinal!"
50
posted on
11/14/2002 4:12:44 PM PST
by
mrustow
To: YoungKentuckyConservative
They hire based on color >and sexual orientation< and not on performance.Let's create a rainbow of diversity!
51
posted on
11/15/2002 8:28:03 AM PST
by
ppaul
To: Professional
52
posted on
11/15/2002 8:35:20 AM PST
by
rdb3
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson