Skip to comments.
The Top 50 Diversity Employers 2002 Rankings
THE BLACK COLLEGIAN MAGAZINE ^
| 11/12/2002
Posted on 11/12/2002 7:39:48 PM PST by John Lenin
The table below presents the 50 most popular employers among students surveyed by The Universum Diversity Survey 2002.The survey, which is conducted annually by the international research and consulting firm Universum Communications, monitors the employment-related opinions of undergraduate and MBA students with minority backgrounds. Over 3,500 students at 53 of the finest universities throughout the United States participated in the 2002 survey.
From a list on the survey questionnaire, respondents were asked to select up to five companies as their ideal employers, or the companies for which they would most like to work. (They had the option of writing in two companies if their preferred employers were not already present on the list.) The data was subsequently tabulated, with the companies selected by the greatest percentage of respondents given the highest rankings on the list of minority students' ideal employers.
COMPANY |
RANKING |
% |
Goldman Sachs |
1 |
14.32 |
Merrill Lynch |
2 |
10.42 |
Walt Disney |
3 |
10.37 |
Microsoft |
4 |
10.31 |
IBM |
5 |
9.97 |
Morgan Stanley |
6 |
9.85 |
McKinsey & Company |
7 |
9.73 |
BMW |
8 |
9.47 |
Sony |
9 |
8.82 |
Coca-Cola |
10 |
8.78 |
AOL Time Warner |
11 |
8.71 |
JPMorganChase |
12 |
8.63 |
PricewaterhouseCoopers |
13 |
8.41 |
Citigroup |
14 |
8.26 |
Accenture |
15 |
7.98 |
The Boston Consulting Group |
16 |
7.94 |
Fox Entertainment |
17 |
7.52 |
General Electric |
18 |
7.41 |
Ernst & Young |
19 |
6.51 |
Andersen |
20 |
6.31 |
Nike |
21 |
6.12 |
Pfizer |
22 |
6.08 |
Deloitte Consulting |
23 |
6.05 |
Bank of America |
24 |
5.88 |
Johnson & Johnson |
25 |
5.66 |
Bain & Company |
26 |
5.50 |
Dell Computer |
27 |
5.38 |
Intel |
28 |
5.23 |
Procter & Gamble |
29 |
5.01 |
The Gap |
30 |
4.89 |
Cisco Systems |
31 |
4.85 |
Boeing |
32 |
4.78 |
American Express |
33 |
4.73 |
3M |
34 |
4.60 |
Lehman Brothers |
35 |
4.32 |
AT&T |
36 |
3.95 |
LucasArts/LucasFilm |
37 |
3.82 |
Booz-Allen Hamilton |
38 |
3.76 |
Credit Suisse First Boston |
39 |
3.75 |
Merck |
40 |
3.71* |
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu |
41 |
3.71* |
Abbott Laboratories |
42 |
3.70 |
Charles Schwab |
43 |
3.60 |
L'Oreal |
44 |
3.57 |
Deutsche Bank |
45 |
3.52 |
Miramax Films |
46 |
3.51 |
Hewlett-Packard |
47 |
3.46 |
General Motors |
48 |
3.35 |
Motorola |
49 |
3.34 |
Bristol-Myers Squibb |
50 |
3.16 |
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Free Republic
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Interesting survey, notice all the Financial Companys on the list.
To: John Lenin; rohry; Dukie; arete; headsonpikes; razorback-bert; Billy_bob_bob
Here's a list of 50 stocks to short.
2
posted on
11/12/2002 7:50:09 PM PST
by
Tauzero
To: Tauzero
I agree.
and will repeat your remarks:
Here's a list of 50 stocks to short.
To: John Lenin
Trust me, nobody should think about working for Boeing.
To: victim soul
Correction: If in this case it means diversity in including all races, I'll buy.
If it means recognition in the workplace of sexual proclivities, I will not buy.
To: John Lenin
Wrong1 the forgot to put the numero uno company there on top: the Gubmint!
To: Tauzero; victim soul
Yes, short some of the best companies in the World.
To: John Lenin
There's a difference between a stock and the underlying company. A good company doesn't necessarily mean a good stock.
8
posted on
11/12/2002 7:57:34 PM PST
by
Tauzero
To: John Lenin
It's interesting, but you've got to remember it's just the opinions of people most of whom have yet to hold a full-time job. BTW, what is "Andersen" doing on there at #20? Isn't Arthur Andersen out of the accounting business after the Enron thing? And Disney at #3? Aren't they cutting back right now? Also, how many people actually work for George Lucas?
Enough questions for now :-)
9
posted on
11/12/2002 7:57:40 PM PST
by
TheMole
To: All
Read the article, it's not about affirmitive action, it's about who the students like best to work for. No comment on the obvious racism.
To: John Lenin
Some folks here didn't read the full article. This list represents the companies minorities would LIKE to work for.
To comment that these are companies to short, is kind of, well, mean spirited and nasty.
To: John Lenin
Yes, short some of the best companies in the world. Since this list is based on a survey of undergraduate opinion, it probably shouldn't serve as a basis for investing strategy. However, I have noticed that whenever a company itself starts making a big hoo-hah about "diversity", it's usually not long before that company's operations and stock value start to decline noticeably.
12
posted on
11/12/2002 8:03:10 PM PST
by
TheMole
To: John Lenin
No wonder all my Merrill-Lynch funds suck. They hire based on color and not on performance. I think I'll go sell my entire portfolio now. =)
To: irishtenor
I interviewed for a job at Boeing (pre-9-11) and was asked several "diversity" questions during the interview. They were sufficiently wierd and pointless that I didn't even turn my job application in.
To: John Lenin
Would appear that many minorities are studying to become stock brokers. Take it from me, the timing isn't particularly good...
To: Revolting cat!
Well, since this was written as a who they would LIKE to work for, I find it impressive that THAT isn't one of the top, not even in the top 20.
To: Tauzero
Note that in this case Diversity means black only.
To: razorback-bert
I wish I would have never posted this artile now.
Comment #19 Removed by Moderator
To: John Lenin
Because of my comment?
I am sure Asians read THE BLACK COLLEGIAN every week or whenever it is published.
Like wise I am sure Hispannics subscribe in large numbers too.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson