Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gail Wynand; looscannon; Lonesome in Massachussets; Freedom'sWorthIt; IVote2; Slyfox; Registered; ..
 
QWER•TY (kwûr'tee) adj.
Of, relating to, or designating the traditional configuration of typewriter or computer keyboard keys. [From the first six letters at the upper left.]
 

 

Q ERTY Series: The Inspiration

No Joke
 
Those who trashed the White House were vicious vandals, not merry pranksters.
 
BY TUNKU VARADARAJAN
Monday, January 29, 2001 12:01 a.m. EST
The Wall Street Journal
 
What is a "prank"? And when does a prank take on a darker hue and
merit, instead, a less indulgent label--such as "delinquency," or
"vandalism"?
 
These questions, whose answers are rooted in common sense, culture and
civilization, were raised last week by revelations first detailed on the
Internet by Matt Drudge, for whose insolent, frontiersman's approach to
newsgathering we continue to be grateful. He's not always right, and
he's not always elegant, but he bawls his tales from the rafters when
others, more timorous and more conventional, would only mince their
words, or whisper.
 
Although the mainstream press echoed the story only reluctantly, and
sought to draw its sting by downgrading it to the status of rumor, the
contents of the Drudge report seemed to be unquestionably consonant with
the tone, the oh-so-jarring tone, struck, in their departure from the
White House, by the Clinton cohorts--from the strutting
self-congratulation of the ex-president at Andrews Air Force Base (like
a weed, he'd taken root, and like a weed he called to be ripped from the
soil beneath him), to the stripping bare of the former Air Force One by
the ex-presidential locusts.
 
According to reports, outgoing Clinton-Gore staffers at the White House
performed a range of "pranks," including the prizing out from many White
House computer keyboards of the W (Dubya) key, the gluing shut of
drawers on office desks, the infecting of computers with viruses, the
recording of offensive reception messages on the answering machines, the
slashing (yes, slashing) of telephone lines, the loading of pornographic
images on printers and computers, offensive graffiti on corridors and
bathroom walls, the turning upside down of desks, and, as a valedictory
signature, the leaving of a trail of trash across the West Wing.
 
Mr. Drudge, the only one to quantify the damage publicly, has put the
monetary estimate--in terms of its cost to the taxpayer--at $200,000.
There is some speculation that this is a conservative estimate...
 
In the context of the White House, any harm or damage must be construed
to include the infliction of a burden on the taxpayer--not to mention
the interference, however temporary, with the business of government.
 

...the slashing of phone lines? The gluing shut of desk drawers? The

gouging out from keyboards of the W key? The infection of computers
with viruses? The redirection of official phone lines, on which the
public and government rely? These, I fear, violate the prankster's
rulebook. They caused damage; lines, desks, computers and keyboards
needed repair and replacement. My money, and yours, was used for this
repair.
 
Most shabby of all, however, was the perpetrators' intent. A true
prank--a prank properly defined--is carried out in a jocular spirit.
Pranks are escapades, monkeyshines. They're not acts of venom or spite,
of resentment or ill-will. If the actor is malefic, he is not a
prankster but a vandal. He is, in truth, a delinquent.
 
That's what I learned in grade school, and I commend that interpretation
to you.
 

Mr. Varadarajan is deputy editorial features editor of The Wall Street Journal. His column appears Mondays.

I would argue with Mr. Varadarajan's contention that mens rea must be considered and that the absence of malicious intent reduces the act to mere prank. Such an argument runs contrary to the concept of strict liability crimes. That doctrine (Park v United States, (1974) 421 US 658,668) established the principle of 'strict liability' or 'liability without fault' in certain criminal cases, usually involving crimes which endanger the public welfare.

"I'm all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools.
Let's start with typewriters."

- Frank Lloyd Wright

Someone recently tested the monkeys-on-typewriters bit trying for the plays of Will Shakespeare, but all they got were the plays of bill clinton.

clinton hunt-and-peck
Q ERTY1

Q ERTY2

Q ERTY3

Q ERTY4

Q ERTY5

Q ERTY6

Q ERTY7

Q ERTY8

Q ERTY9

 

 
 

3 posted on 11/12/2002 9:35:39 AM PST by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mia T
WooooooooHOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

Mia T ROCKS...MUD

5 posted on 11/12/2002 9:41:07 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
Thank you. Is it just me or have you been MIA, Mia T?
6 posted on 11/12/2002 9:55:25 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
Mia T, you are one bright, funny and talented lady. My hat's off to you for the quality of your work. Good to have you on FR again, now that the bandwidth-sucking election is over.

Congressman Billybob

"to Restore Trust in America"

10 posted on 11/12/2002 11:38:38 AM PST by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
Hi Mia Bttt
11 posted on 11/12/2002 11:50:26 AM PST by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T; Wphile; ohioWfan; cyn; Freedom'sWorthIt; Marysecretary; Diogenesis; holdonnow
All-if you fail to click on Mia's Q ERTY 8-you will be missing a knock out punch towards bill and hill.

Mia..........Q ERTY 8 and Q ERTY 9 knocked my socks off! I truly wish the folks at the WH who had to deal with the missing W's on their computer keyboards could grab a gander at your novel commentary. I believe they would get a huge belly laugh.....you have nailed it, Mia, YOU DON'T NEED A W to define the clintons, EVER. Loved the sound effects-the bawdy crowd, the hurrahs, the children's voices-FABULOUS! The RNC could use you on their staff-your perspective and your way of sharing it is astounding, dead-on and funny, all in one big splashy presentation.

Love it!

And re-reading your 02-03-02 post was as correct in its prediction of the doomed nature of clintonism as any I have seen written anywhere. When you wrote:

The unwashed masses, the uninformed, the disinformed can see it now. All America can see it now. Self-preservation is kicking in, trumping petty politics at every turn.

And this is why Democrat demagoguery and stupidity and sedition are achieving new lows...,

you could not have known, as you said, that it would be merely months, not years, for their vile legacy to impact our nation so very brutally. It certainly has. And the failed clinton MO is being exposed with tremendous clarity (and yeah, 9/11 was the catalyst, I agree).

People are turning from them in droves...BIG TIME!

Great, great vision, Mia, super commentary with dead-on graphics to burn your point home.

You go girl.....you are a classic!

12 posted on 11/12/2002 12:10:36 PM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
A thanks for the ping, ping.
15 posted on 11/12/2002 6:44:49 PM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
These are the best QWERTYS yet! Gold star to QWERTY 9. We need an Academy/Oscar type award for you.

Jen

16 posted on 11/12/2002 8:24:23 PM PST by IVote2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Mia T
Please add me to your ping list
30 posted on 03/22/2003 4:33:20 PM PST by Tulsa Brian (Sentio aliquos togatos contra me conspirare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson