Skip to comments.
Oklahoma - Brad Henry (D) upsets Steve Largent in governor's race
Associated Press
| November 5, 2002
Posted on 11/05/2002 10:04:35 PM PST by HAL9000
(Oklahoma City-AP) -- Democratic state Senator Brad Henry has upset former Congressman Steve Largent in the race for governor. Henry beat Largent by a razor-thin margin out of about one (m) million votes cast today, leading by about five-thousand votes.
Henry did not declare victory with about one percent of the precincts still uncounted and Largent did not concede.
Largent was considered a heavy favorite in the race and Henry was a virtual political unknown six months ago.
Largent won big in Oklahoma City and in Tulsa, but Henry won most rural counties, especially in eastern Oklahoma where a state question to ban cockfighting resulted in a large turnout.
(Copyright 2002 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: bradhenry; oklahoma; stevelargent
1
posted on
11/05/2002 10:04:35 PM PST
by
HAL9000
To: HAL9000
2
posted on
11/05/2002 10:11:53 PM PST
by
jbstrick
To: HAL9000; PhiKapMom
...but Henry won most rural counties, especially in eastern Oklahoma where a state
question to ban cockfighting resulted in a large turnout.
So, the folks in the eastern counties turned out to vote for cock-fighting and Brad Henry?
I love my old home state...
(although they should have voted for Largent)
3
posted on
11/05/2002 10:14:47 PM PST
by
VOA
To: VOA
to lose because of cockfighting... too funny...
4
posted on
11/05/2002 10:21:13 PM PST
by
ambrose
To: VOA
So, the folks in the eastern counties turned out to vote for cock-fighting and Brad Henry?and yet the cock-fighting ban appears to have passed rather handily (thank goodness) so it remains to be seen if there's a correlation. I think Largent's opposition to a state lottery may have been his undoing.
To: ambrose
to lose because of cockfighting... too funny...
Yes, but what I thought was rich is that it sounds like Brad Henry (the Democrat)
may have won because of cockfighting!
I can't wait to get PhiKapMom's update on this...
(I've been out of the state too long...but I think a "ringer" of a third candidate
may have substantial contributed to Largent's loss...)
But when cockfighting is in the mix...it overshadows all else!
6
posted on
11/05/2002 10:29:54 PM PST
by
VOA
To: ambrose
Largent has not lost yet.
And if he does, it's because of the Independant candidate Richardson.
To: State'sRightsStandSupreme
The posted link has Largent up by 10,000 votes.
To: KsSunflower
that's because it's not showing all precincts reported.
To: VOA
From what I heard tonight from the Cole Campaign Watch Party -- we won the 4th District of J.C. Watts after they (Keating) redistricted four heavily DemocRAT counties into the 4th -- Keating encouraged putting cockfighting on the ballot during this election. Very DUMB move!
To: HAL9000
Here are my thoughts.
Largent did not make an effort tp dispell the myths of a state lottery. Most people are voting for the other canidates because they support a lottery. They think it is a magis bullet to solve the education system's fiscal irresponsibility.
I did not hear a valid arguement from the Largent campaign for his stance against the issue. (I am against it and have converted many of my neighbors with some simple points)
I hear he won handily in OKC and Tulsa. Did he make any trips outside of the metro areas? I don't remember.
It appears to me that the loss is completely self inflicted.
John
Ponca City, OK
11
posted on
11/05/2002 11:15:15 PM PST
by
jbstrick
To: State'sRightsStandSupreme
I think the people that voted for Henry and Richardson were voting for the lottery...I suspect Richardson stole votes from Henry. I hate to say it, but had Richardson not been on the ballot, it would have been a blowout for Henry.
It's 3:35am here...what's the latest news?
To: 2Jedismom
I agree with you. Largent did not run a good campaign. He ran on "I'm steve largent.... I played football.... and I'm a republican"
13
posted on
11/06/2002 4:19:35 AM PST
by
kjam22
To: VOA
So, the folks in the eastern counties turned out to vote for cock-fighting and Brad Henry? Yup. Largent had his head up his you-know-where bigtime on this one.
Cockfighting was a freedom issue and Largent failed the test.
14
posted on
11/06/2002 6:58:22 AM PST
by
HetLoo
To: HetLoo
"Cockfighting is a freedom issue.."
What the....??? And why do you say that? I have a problem with this conception? Why is it OK to fight Chickens and not dogs or any other animal?
15
posted on
11/06/2002 7:18:56 AM PST
by
jbstrick
To: jbstrick
Who said it's wrong to fight dogs? Are you talking morally or legally? 'Cause I don't remember ever voting to ban fighting of any kind of animal or human.
Of course now that the ban has passed, it doesn't matter if you think its right or wrong. Your ability to make a moral decision has been ripped right out from under you.
16
posted on
11/06/2002 7:57:26 AM PST
by
HetLoo
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson