Posted on 10/30/2002 3:57:23 AM PST by el_texicano
WASHINGTON – Former President Jimmy Carter owes an explanation to the American people for his behavior during the Cold War, says the author of a new book. "Reagan’s War” reveals new information that Carter, as president and later as a private citizen, sought the help of an avowed foreign enemy of this country to undermine Reagan’s candidacy in 1980 and, even more shocking, to cripple President Reagan’s foreign policy in 1984.
The former Democrat president, who had been ousted by the voters four years earlier, wanted the Soviets to help him put a Democrat back in the White House.
Speaking Tuesday at a seminar at the Institute of World Politics, the book’s author, Peter Schweizer, said Jimmy Carter owes a full explanation, and then depending on his answer, a decision could be made as to whether the former president "stepped over the line” from pure dissent to giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
NewsMax.com CEO Christopher Ruddy has written that Carter "may well have committed treason by enlisting the help of the Soviet Union in the 1980 and 1984 presidential elections.”
"It’s a fair question for him [Carter] to give his account of what happened, and a response, which he has not done,” the author told NewsMax.com. "Then, you know, depending on his reaction and response, there needs to be further discussion. The other thing potentially that perhaps ought to be asked [is that] that Moscow release any files it has” on the meetings.
"All we have right now,” Schweizer added, "is based on these accounts by [former Soviet Ambassador] Dobrynin. And it begs the question: Is there any more material based on his [Carter’s] dealings with Moscow?”
'Carter Won't Forget' Soviet Assistance
Schweizer’s book, which is going straight to the best-seller lists, reveals that during the 1980 campaign when Reagan was gaining in the polls, Carter "dispatched [pro-Soviet industrialist] Armand Hammer to the Soviet Embassy for a secret meeting with Ambassador Dobrynin to ask for Soviet help” with Jewish emigration and other potential vote-getting issues for a sitting president. The Soviets were promised that "Carter won’t forget that service if he is re-elected.”
Note this was years before the Clinton era when leaning on foreign sources to boost domestic political fortunes became a way of life.
It is ironic that later in Reagan’s presidency, congressional leftists launched a witch hunt based on an out-of-thin-air charge that Reagan and his future CIA Director Bill Casey tried to persuade officials of the terrorist government of Iran to wait until after the election before releasing the American hostages they had held for months. The charges were proven to be totally phony.
Schweizer reports that when Reagan was running for re-election in 1984, Carter himself visited Ambassador Dobrynin and warned there "would not be a single agreement on arms control, especially on nuclear arms, as long as Reagan was in power.”
Carter wanted the Soviet Union to help the Democrats regain the presidency. History shows the prophecy about no hope for a nuclear arms agreement turned out to be wrong. It was a part of Reagan's success in ending the Cold War on America’s terms.
Asking Carter to explain to Americans this part of his stewardship is most "reasonable,” in Schweizer’s view. When he asked the former president about this, all the author got was "No comment.”
NewsMax posited an uproar that would have ensued had former President Herbert Hoover visited the German or Japanese embassy in early 1941, before U.S. involvement in the Second World War, and said, "What are we going to do about that wild man [Franklin Roosevelt] in the White House?”
Dissent in foreign policy is constitutionally protected. Since the founding of the republic, every war in which the U.S. has been involved was preceded by honest dissent from citizens. The question here is: At what point does dissent cross the line into collaborating with the enemy?
Carter's actions revealed in "Reagan’s War” may lead legal experts to revisit the issue.
Soviets Spawned Muslim Terrorists
At the IWP seminar, longtime espionage and former intelligence official Herbert Romerstein presented airtight documentation that many Islamic terrorist groups of today were originated by the old Soviet Union. He called on the Russian government to release the files on terrorist groups their predecessors created.
"The Russians could also make available KGB information on those politicians and foreign policy ‘experts’ that collaborated with them against President Reagan,” Romerstein added.
Whatever those files say about Jimmy Carter could make for interesting reading.
NO, It's the Republicans!
Oh and that's sarcasm by the way.
Too many people with no property, no future and no stake in the country's fate are voting.
Too many mental defectives, fools and imbeciles are voting.
Too many people that are ruled by the tyranny of raw emotion, who are concerned only with the petty issues of the home and hearth, are voting.
Too many people with childlike minds and agendas are voting.
The treasonous democrats aren't the disease, they're merely a manifestation of it. The dead don’t vote until all of the above have cast their ballots in election after election after election.
. . . as in. . .'what is the definition of treason?'
Whatever they decide, Jimmy Carter is a traitor.
. . .how do you think all these caring, civic-minded 'voters' get registered (and as Democrats, of course) and how do these people, who cannot tie their shoes get their ballots mailed or even arrive at their polls to vote. . .
'how do they know?
The kind of voters you describe; don't just happen. . .
Sorry, the Demrats are more than a manifestation of the problem. . .they ARE the problem.
Is there reason to doubt these statements:
"All we have right now,” Schweizer added, "is based on these accounts by [former Soviet Ambassador] Dobrynin. And it begs the question: Is there any more material based on his [Carter’s] dealings with Moscow?”
Carter "dispatched [pro-Soviet industrialist] Armand Hammer to the Soviet Embassy for a secret meeting with Ambassador Dobrynin to ask for Soviet help”
If so, please elaborate.
The book is well written and worth reading.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.