|
Democrats won the right to put Frank Lautenberg's name on the ballot this year after arguing that democracy would be better served by a healthy, vibrant competition between two major-party candidates. Lautenberg's shameless ducking of televised debates makes a mockery of that position. New Jersey voters vote statewide for only two offices: governor and U.S. senator. Less than three weeks before the election, voters more than ever need to see GOP Senate candidate Douglas Forrester and his brand-new opponent, Lautenberg, debate each other on the issues. Health care. Education. Environment. Defense. Civil liberties. Homeland security. When he met Forrester at a campaign stop two weeks ago, Lautenberg said he would debate Forrester 'anywhere, anytime.' Pure bluster. Lautenberg canceled a planned debate this Sunday on 'Meet the Press' and has so far agreed to only one face-to-face, televised debate -- a mere three days before the election. That's not enough. Time is running out. There are numerous organizations and media outlets willing to sponsor debates -- including The Press, for that matter. Forrester says he will debate anytime. He'll even reluctantly agree to Lautenberg's caveat that debates include third-party candidates, as well. But flush with money and leading in the polls, Lautenberg's strategy is apparently to minimize his appearances before the press and public. That's wrong -- particularly in this election. Debate, Mr. Lautenberg. Your name is on the ballot because this state and its courts have a fierce commitment to a healthy, vital election process. Don't let them down.î -- The Press of Atlantic City editorial, October 18, 2002 click here to view full column:
|
