Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Church bells are silenced in fear of European Union law
the Daily Telegraph ^ | 17 Oct 02 | By Richard Savill

Posted on 10/16/2002 6:23:04 PM PDT by Glutton

Complaints by new residents have silenced the church bells in a small country town after the vicar feared the chimes could be breaking European law.

The bells at St Mary's Church in Totnes, Devon - England's second oldest borough - have sounded every quarter of an hour since a civic subscription scheme paid for the clock to mark Queen Victoria's Golden Jubilee in 1887.

But a small group of residents - believed to be newcomers - have protested that the chimes stop them sleeping at night.

"Amongst the old Totnesians, there is a certain amount of fury that I have silenced the clock," said the Rev Nicholas Martin.

"But I have been advised by a lawyer friend that the European Court of Human Rights has said people should be guaranteed the right to sleep free of noise, light or smell pollution.

"I felt therefore I had no alternative but to silence the clock, as technically we could be in breach of the law. I don't know if anyone would have taken us to court, but European law is becoming more important."

Mr Martin said he hoped that as a compromise he would be able to fit a special mechanism so that the chimes would only sound during daylight.

However, this would cost £1,500 and the church had already spent £100,000 on roof repairs, he added.

Mary Wesley, the best-selling author of The Camomile Lawn and one of the more established residents of Totnes, said: "I love the church, and the chimes are a big part of life down here. They should be enjoyed by everyone and it is very sad not to have them at the moment."

Totnes town council said an abatement notice could be served if there was excessive noise. "In this case we received a letter of complaint from a young family living about 90 yards from the church, who said they had difficulty sleeping because of the clock striking," said a spokesman.

"The next step would have been to visit the church late at night after the pubs had shut to see if the noise was excessive. However, I understand that the clock has since stopped, so as far as we're concerned, there won't be any further action."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banninglaws; bans; churchbells
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 10/16/2002 6:23:05 PM PDT by Glutton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Glutton
the vicar feared the chimes could be breaking European law.

Vicars with spines, please step forward...

2 posted on 10/16/2002 6:25:02 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
But a small group of residents - believed to be newcomers - have protested that the chimes stop them sleeping at night.

I wonder what religion those newcomers are?
3 posted on 10/16/2002 6:26:39 PM PDT by Michael2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
This is Nuts. I'm surprised. And who are these newcomers?
Financial types from the city?

How could this be against EU law?
4 posted on 10/16/2002 6:27:54 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
guaranteed the right to sleep free of noise, light or smell pollution.

Aybody here ever gotten used to sleep in the city?
Sirens.
Jet takeoffs.
Partying neighbors.
You DO get used to it.
And then you move to the country.
The ABSENCE of noise will keep you awake for a while.
But you get used to that too.
Reminds me of the idiots who moved to a cheap house near the airport and then complain about the jet noise.
Except the townsfolk here aren't the ones complaining.
It's the new world order.

5 posted on 10/16/2002 6:29:05 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
I bet very loud Muslim calls to prayers would never get this sort of treatment.
6 posted on 10/16/2002 6:29:46 PM PDT by Glutton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
CORRECTION: it IS the townsfolk doing at least SOME of the complaining.
But the fear of the new world order is there, as well.
7 posted on 10/16/2002 6:30:34 PM PDT by Izzy Dunne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
It sounds as though the Vicar is trying to push the New World Order, rather than reacting in fear of it.
8 posted on 10/16/2002 6:33:09 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
...the European Court of Human Rights has said people should be guaranteed the right to sleep free of noise, light or smell pollution.

Uh huh. Good luck, then.

9 posted on 10/16/2002 6:33:26 PM PDT by shezza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
,,, I wonder what contingency plans are in place to deal with the sound from rain hitting a roof.
10 posted on 10/16/2002 6:33:32 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shezza
I wonder if it ever occured to them that forbidding "noise pollution" at night, while allowing the same noises in the day, infringes on the "rights" of night shift workers.

The notion that people have a right to undisturbed sleep seems to be predicated on the idea that everyone works 9-5. There's lots of 3-11 and 11-7 people out there (or however people in the UK split up 24/7 jobs). What about their rights?

Yet another can o' worms the EU chose to open.

11 posted on 10/16/2002 6:37:20 PM PDT by kaylar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
Guess since the article dances around who the newcomers are..one must be suspicious.

If its a case where a suburban family moves to a rural area and doesn't like cocks crowing or manure smelling, an article will usually mention the who and the why.

The omission is puzzling unless, of course, you are right.
12 posted on 10/16/2002 6:39:57 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
They made us stop ring the bells at our church years ago. Nothing here. Just shows there are idiots in Europe too.
13 posted on 10/16/2002 6:40:02 PM PDT by MissBaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shezza
...the European Court of Human Rights has said people should be guaranteed the right to sleep free of....smell pollution.
Paris is in big trouble.
14 posted on 10/16/2002 6:40:44 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
That's not all churches have to fear. This is mild and just the beginning ... .
15 posted on 10/16/2002 6:43:59 PM PDT by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
,,, Paris or Brussels?
16 posted on 10/16/2002 6:44:05 PM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: shezza
"people should be guaranteed the right to sleep free of noise"


I wonder if this means we can arrest and charge our two week old babies for ruining our sleep? Perhaps we can arrest the IRS for ruining our sleep in mid april too?

I got rights ya know!
17 posted on 10/16/2002 6:52:28 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
"But I have been advised by a lawyer friend that the European Court of Human Rights has said people should be guaranteed the right to sleep free of noise, light or smell pollution.

"I felt therefore I had no alternative but to silence the clock, as technically we could be in breach of the law. I don't know if anyone would have taken us to court, but European law is becoming more important."

Taken another way, and especially in context of the whole story (incomplete as it is!), this statement could maybe be seen as a bit of (admittedly) mild "gauntlet throwing", don't you think?!

Just a thought, maybe wishful on my part...

18 posted on 10/16/2002 7:58:32 PM PDT by 88keys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
Cutting the bells off at around 8pm is a courtesy to those who live near the church. I grew up across the street from a church that did it that way, and it was appreciated by the neighborhood.
19 posted on 10/16/2002 8:09:54 PM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glutton
WHY did they move there, knowing the church chimed? I think they wanted the church as an issue. Should be forced to leave that town, IMO.
20 posted on 10/16/2002 8:11:37 PM PDT by Letitring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson