Skip to comments.
Church bells are silenced in fear of European Union law
the Daily Telegraph ^
| 17 Oct 02
| By Richard Savill
Posted on 10/16/2002 6:23:04 PM PDT by Glutton
Complaints by new residents have silenced the church bells in a small country town after the vicar feared the chimes could be breaking European law.
The bells at St Mary's Church in Totnes, Devon - England's second oldest borough - have sounded every quarter of an hour since a civic subscription scheme paid for the clock to mark Queen Victoria's Golden Jubilee in 1887.
But a small group of residents - believed to be newcomers - have protested that the chimes stop them sleeping at night.
"Amongst the old Totnesians, there is a certain amount of fury that I have silenced the clock," said the Rev Nicholas Martin.
"But I have been advised by a lawyer friend that the European Court of Human Rights has said people should be guaranteed the right to sleep free of noise, light or smell pollution.
"I felt therefore I had no alternative but to silence the clock, as technically we could be in breach of the law. I don't know if anyone would have taken us to court, but European law is becoming more important."
Mr Martin said he hoped that as a compromise he would be able to fit a special mechanism so that the chimes would only sound during daylight.
However, this would cost £1,500 and the church had already spent £100,000 on roof repairs, he added.
Mary Wesley, the best-selling author of The Camomile Lawn and one of the more established residents of Totnes, said: "I love the church, and the chimes are a big part of life down here. They should be enjoyed by everyone and it is very sad not to have them at the moment."
Totnes town council said an abatement notice could be served if there was excessive noise. "In this case we received a letter of complaint from a young family living about 90 yards from the church, who said they had difficulty sleeping because of the clock striking," said a spokesman.
"The next step would have been to visit the church late at night after the pubs had shut to see if the noise was excessive. However, I understand that the clock has since stopped, so as far as we're concerned, there won't be any further action."
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banninglaws; bans; churchbells
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
10/16/2002 6:23:05 PM PDT
by
Glutton
To: Glutton
the vicar feared the chimes could be breaking European law. Vicars with spines, please step forward...
To: Glutton
But a small group of residents - believed to be newcomers - have protested that the chimes stop them sleeping at night.
I wonder what religion those newcomers are?
To: Glutton
This is Nuts. I'm surprised. And who are these newcomers?
Financial types from the city?
How could this be against EU law?
To: Glutton
guaranteed the right to sleep free of noise, light or smell pollution. Aybody here ever gotten used to sleep in the city?
Sirens.
Jet takeoffs.
Partying neighbors.
You DO get used to it.
And then you move to the country.
The ABSENCE of noise will keep you awake for a while.
But you get used to that too.
Reminds me of the idiots who moved to a cheap house near the airport and then complain about the jet noise.
Except the townsfolk here aren't the ones complaining.
It's the new world order.
To: swarthyguy
I bet very loud Muslim calls to prayers would never get this sort of treatment.
6
posted on
10/16/2002 6:29:46 PM PDT
by
Glutton
To: Izzy Dunne
CORRECTION: it IS the townsfolk doing at least SOME of the complaining.
But the fear of the new world order is there, as well.
To: Izzy Dunne
It sounds as though the Vicar is trying to push the New World Order, rather than reacting in fear of it.
8
posted on
10/16/2002 6:33:09 PM PDT
by
marktwain
To: Glutton
...the European Court of Human Rights has said people should be guaranteed the right to sleep free of noise, light or smell pollution. Uh huh. Good luck, then.
9
posted on
10/16/2002 6:33:26 PM PDT
by
shezza
To: Glutton
,,, I wonder what contingency plans are in place to deal with the sound from rain hitting a roof.
To: shezza
I wonder if it ever occured to them that forbidding "noise pollution" at night, while allowing the same noises in the day, infringes on the "rights" of night shift workers.
The notion that people have a right to undisturbed sleep seems to be predicated on the idea that everyone works 9-5. There's lots of 3-11 and 11-7 people out there (or however people in the UK split up 24/7 jobs). What about their rights?
Yet another can o' worms the EU chose to open.
11
posted on
10/16/2002 6:37:20 PM PDT
by
kaylar
To: Glutton
Guess since the article dances around who the newcomers are..one must be suspicious.
If its a case where a suburban family moves to a rural area and doesn't like cocks crowing or manure smelling, an article will usually mention the who and the why.
The omission is puzzling unless, of course, you are right.
To: Glutton
They made us stop ring the bells at our church years ago. Nothing here. Just shows there are idiots in Europe too.
13
posted on
10/16/2002 6:40:02 PM PDT
by
MissBaby
To: shezza
...the European Court of Human Rights has said people should be guaranteed the right to sleep free of....smell pollution.
Paris is in big trouble.
14
posted on
10/16/2002 6:40:44 PM PDT
by
Arkinsaw
To: Glutton
That's not all churches have to fear. This is mild and just the beginning ... .
15
posted on
10/16/2002 6:43:59 PM PDT
by
nmh
To: Arkinsaw
,,, Paris or Brussels?
To: shezza
"people should be guaranteed the right to sleep free of noise"
I wonder if this means we can arrest and charge our two week old babies for ruining our sleep? Perhaps we can arrest the IRS for ruining our sleep in mid april too?
I got rights ya know!
To: Izzy Dunne
"But I have been advised by a lawyer friend that the European Court of Human Rights has said people should be guaranteed the right to sleep free of noise, light or smell pollution. "I felt therefore I had no alternative but to silence the clock, as technically we could be in breach of the law. I don't know if anyone would have taken us to court, but European law is becoming more important."
Taken another way, and especially in context of the whole story (incomplete as it is!), this statement could maybe be seen as a bit of (admittedly) mild "gauntlet throwing", don't you think?!
Just a thought, maybe wishful on my part...
18
posted on
10/16/2002 7:58:32 PM PDT
by
88keys
To: Glutton
Cutting the bells off at around 8pm is a courtesy to those who live near the church. I grew up across the street from a church that did it that way, and it was appreciated by the neighborhood.
To: Glutton
WHY did they move there, knowing the church chimed? I think they wanted the church as an issue. Should be forced to leave that town, IMO.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson