Skip to comments.
Russian Soyuz blows up, killing one
CNNDOTCOM^ ^
| October 16, 2002 Posted: 9:52 AM EDT
| Reuters
Posted on 10/16/2002 11:09:04 AM PDT by AdA$tra
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:01:27 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
MOSCOW (Reuters) --A Russian Soyuz rocket carrying a research satellite exploded seconds after blast-off, killing one person in a setback that could hit the international space station program, officials said on Wednesday.
The 300-ton unmanned Soyuz-U rocket exploded 29 seconds after take-off from Russia's Arctic Plesetsk cosmodrome late on Tuesday, its blazing debris showering onto the launchpad, an Emergencies Ministry spokesman said.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: goboom; iss; nasa; soyuz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Boom: Too bad it was not he flight with Lance Bass on board :-)
1
posted on
10/16/2002 11:09:04 AM PDT
by
AdA$tra
To: AdA$tra
29 seconds after lift-off, the blast shouldn't have killed anybody.
2
posted on
10/16/2002 11:11:19 AM PDT
by
Physicist
To: AdA$tra
Soyuz has an escape tower, so it's possible that this would have been survivable if it had been a crewed flight. The Russians have had crews survive launch failures like this (though it's quite a high-g ride and landing).
To: AdA$tra
In the voice of Gilda Radner:
"That was so funny I forgot to laugh!"
To: NonZeroSum
I wonder how much better off the Russian space industry would have been if NASA hadn't jealously thwarted privatized space station Mir's progress, as is graphically and concisely documented at:
http://www.spaceprojects.com/Mir
To: Physicist
"29 seconds after lift-off, the blast shouldn't have killed anybody." Absolutemente'. How in the world was anyone even INJURED? 29 seconds after liftoff, the stage would be fairly high and somewhat downrange. This makes no sense...
Michael
To: Physicist
29 seconds after lift-off, the blast shouldn't have killed anybody. One imagines an old Apollo 11 type lift-off in slooow motion or something.. Those old things sure took their sweet time in clearing the tower.
I recall seeing some Soyuz launch video, as I recall, those things popped right up and away. Maybe the payload was really, really heavy...
7
posted on
10/16/2002 11:31:22 AM PDT
by
Paradox
To: Physicist
It said "shockwave." Must have been using the same fertilzer that McVeigh had in his truck that can knock down a building 60 feet away for rocket fuel.
8
posted on
10/16/2002 11:46:28 AM PDT
by
AdA$tra
To: Wright is right!
"A 20-year-old serviceman was killed by the blast's shockwave and eight other people were injured, defense ministry officials said."
Not necessarly high and down range. If the motor was under performing, it may not have been too high. The word used in the above says "SHOCKWAVE" indicates a catastrophic accident instead of just burning.
Rockets fired at that latitude are virtually vertical, depending on later correction at higher altitudes to correct the orbital path. Our orbiting rockets take advantage of the earths rotation to obtain orbit speed.
9
posted on
10/16/2002 11:47:20 AM PDT
by
Lokibob
To: End The Hypocrisy
Your Pravda style of writing needs much improvement.
"graphically and concisely documented"
???
#1. There are no significant graphs.
#2. 50 pages of anti-US diatribe does not count as "concise."
#3. Just because someone types a "document" does not mean it is true. I specifically refer you to "The Myth of the Six Million."
You will find that FReepers do not let you get away with emotion-laden, logic-lacking postings.
To: AdA$tra
Go away.......the death penalty for Bass......for what?
To: OldFriend
Go away.......the death penalty for Bass......for what?
One has to wonder if he is just a little nervous after hearing about this.
12
posted on
10/16/2002 12:28:22 PM PDT
by
AdA$tra
To: Paradox
One imagines an old Apollo 11 type lift-off in slooow motion or something
Perhaps that is because those old films are in sloooow motion. I actually take some offense to the idea of those being "old" lift-offs. Seems like it was just yesterday to me. ;~)
13
posted on
10/16/2002 12:33:23 PM PDT
by
AdA$tra
To: Physicist
what comes up, must come down. Maybe it fell on him. heh.
14
posted on
10/16/2002 12:36:06 PM PDT
by
rudypoot
To: Physicist
exploded 29 seconds after take-off Had to be that the range safety officer took it out as it was coming back. It sure wasn't ten miles downrange.
To: AdA$tra
Anyone participating in the space program of any country must have tremendous courage.
To: OldFriend
Anyone participating in the space program of any country must have tremendous courage.
If it ain't Boeing, I ain't going!
17
posted on
10/16/2002 1:17:34 PM PDT
by
AdA$tra
To: OldFriend
Anyone participating in the space program of any country must have tremendous courage.
Truthfully.....I would go on either the Shuttle or Soyuz in a heartbeat!
18
posted on
10/16/2002 1:19:21 PM PDT
by
AdA$tra
To: AdA$tra
Boeing, Boeing, Boeing, gone!
To: AdA$tra
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson