Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russian Soyuz blows up, killing one
CNNDOTCOM^ ^ | October 16, 2002 Posted: 9:52 AM EDT | Reuters

Posted on 10/16/2002 11:09:04 AM PDT by AdA$tra

Edited on 04/29/2004 2:01:27 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

MOSCOW (Reuters) --A Russian Soyuz rocket carrying a research satellite exploded seconds after blast-off, killing one person in a setback that could hit the international space station program, officials said on Wednesday.

The 300-ton unmanned Soyuz-U rocket exploded 29 seconds after take-off from Russia's Arctic Plesetsk cosmodrome late on Tuesday, its blazing debris showering onto the launchpad, an Emergencies Ministry spokesman said.


(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: goboom; iss; nasa; soyuz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Boom: Too bad it was not he flight with Lance Bass on board :-)
1 posted on 10/16/2002 11:09:04 AM PDT by AdA$tra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AdA$tra
29 seconds after lift-off, the blast shouldn't have killed anybody.
2 posted on 10/16/2002 11:11:19 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdA$tra
Soyuz has an escape tower, so it's possible that this would have been survivable if it had been a crewed flight. The Russians have had crews survive launch failures like this (though it's quite a high-g ride and landing).
3 posted on 10/16/2002 11:11:49 AM PDT by NonZeroSum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdA$tra
In the voice of Gilda Radner:

"That was so funny I forgot to laugh!"

4 posted on 10/16/2002 11:12:39 AM PDT by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum
I wonder how much better off the Russian space industry would have been if NASA hadn't jealously thwarted privatized space station Mir's progress, as is graphically and concisely documented at:

http://www.spaceprojects.com/Mir
5 posted on 10/16/2002 11:16:52 AM PDT by End The Hypocrisy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
"29 seconds after lift-off, the blast shouldn't have killed anybody."

Absolutemente'. How in the world was anyone even INJURED? 29 seconds after liftoff, the stage would be fairly high and somewhat downrange. This makes no sense...

Michael

6 posted on 10/16/2002 11:22:52 AM PDT by Wright is right!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
29 seconds after lift-off, the blast shouldn't have killed anybody.

One imagines an old Apollo 11 type lift-off in slooow motion or something.. Those old things sure took their sweet time in clearing the tower.

I recall seeing some Soyuz launch video, as I recall, those things popped right up and away. Maybe the payload was really, really heavy...

7 posted on 10/16/2002 11:31:22 AM PDT by Paradox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
It said "shockwave." Must have been using the same fertilzer that McVeigh had in his truck that can knock down a building 60 feet away for rocket fuel.
8 posted on 10/16/2002 11:46:28 AM PDT by AdA$tra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wright is right!
"A 20-year-old serviceman was killed by the blast's shockwave and eight other people were injured, defense ministry officials said."

Not necessarly high and down range. If the motor was under performing, it may not have been too high. The word used in the above says "SHOCKWAVE" indicates a catastrophic accident instead of just burning.

Rockets fired at that latitude are virtually vertical, depending on later correction at higher altitudes to correct the orbital path. Our orbiting rockets take advantage of the earths rotation to obtain orbit speed.
9 posted on 10/16/2002 11:47:20 AM PDT by Lokibob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: End The Hypocrisy
Your Pravda style of writing needs much improvement.

"graphically and concisely documented"

???

#1. There are no significant graphs.

#2. 50 pages of anti-US diatribe does not count as "concise."

#3. Just because someone types a "document" does not mean it is true. I specifically refer you to "The Myth of the Six Million."

You will find that FReepers do not let you get away with emotion-laden, logic-lacking postings.
10 posted on 10/16/2002 11:57:23 AM PDT by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AdA$tra
Go away.......the death penalty for Bass......for what?
11 posted on 10/16/2002 12:13:50 PM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Go away.......the death penalty for Bass......for what?

One has to wonder if he is just a little nervous after hearing about this.
12 posted on 10/16/2002 12:28:22 PM PDT by AdA$tra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
One imagines an old Apollo 11 type lift-off in slooow motion or something

Perhaps that is because those old films are in sloooow motion. I actually take some offense to the idea of those being "old" lift-offs. Seems like it was just yesterday to me. ;~)
13 posted on 10/16/2002 12:33:23 PM PDT by AdA$tra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
what comes up, must come down. Maybe it fell on him. heh.
14 posted on 10/16/2002 12:36:06 PM PDT by rudypoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
exploded 29 seconds after take-off

Had to be that the range safety officer took it out as it was coming back. It sure wasn't ten miles downrange.

15 posted on 10/16/2002 12:36:28 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AdA$tra
Anyone participating in the space program of any country must have tremendous courage.
16 posted on 10/16/2002 12:53:46 PM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Anyone participating in the space program of any country must have tremendous courage.

If it ain't Boeing, I ain't going!
17 posted on 10/16/2002 1:17:34 PM PDT by AdA$tra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Anyone participating in the space program of any country must have tremendous courage.

Truthfully.....I would go on either the Shuttle or Soyuz in a heartbeat!
18 posted on 10/16/2002 1:19:21 PM PDT by AdA$tra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AdA$tra
Boeing, Boeing, Boeing, gone!
19 posted on 10/16/2002 1:19:49 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AdA$tra
>>>If it ain't Boeing, I ain't going"

You ain't going then. Here's Boeing's way of doing business:

http://www.spaceprojects.com/iss
20 posted on 10/16/2002 4:25:57 PM PDT by End The Hypocrisy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson