Skip to comments.
Woman left to discover jar containing her baby
Daily Record (UK) ^
| Oct 8 2002
| Lisa Adams
Posted on 10/10/2002 9:03:41 AM PDT by Bush2000
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
She said: "I fell apart. I couldn't believe anyone could be careless enough just to leave it lying there. That image will live with me forever."
This is the reason that NOW and other organizations don't want people to get counseling that shows them explicitly what happens during and after an abortion. The procedures are so horrific that the average person simply wouldn't go through with it; hence, the legal attacks on protesters with protest signs bearing images of aborted fetuses.
She and husband Frank, 26, who is epileptic, decided a fourth child would be too much to cope with.
So now, instead, she has to cope with the lifelong guilt of aborting her baby. Some trade. How long would she have had to "cope" with this baby had it lived? Five years, until he or she was ready for school?
1
posted on
10/10/2002 9:03:41 AM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: Bush2000
She said: "I fell apart. I couldn't believe anyone could be careless enough just to leave it lying there. That image will live with me forever."I would have sympathy for her if she hadn't just murdered a tiny little human being.
The scary thing is, this woman has three children at home. I wonder how they feel about all this?
The least she could have done is carry the baby to term and give it up for adoption.
2
posted on
10/10/2002 9:11:59 AM PDT
by
xm177e2
To: Bush2000
She said: "I fell apart. I couldn't believe anyone could be careless enough just to leave it lying there. That image will live with me forever." You're right - that image will live with you forever. You will spend eternity pondering the enormity of your crime of murdering your own child. I guess you just got a little preview in the hospital.
3
posted on
10/10/2002 9:20:32 AM PDT
by
Spiff
To: Bush2000
The jar was labelled with her name. She said: "I fell apart. I couldn't believe anyone could be careless enough just to leave it lying there. That image will live with me forever." Quite right. They should have put her in the trash compactor like usual.
To: Bush2000
She said: "I fell apart. I couldn't believe anyone could be careless enough just to leave it lying there. That image will live with me forever." No sympathy here. She should be haunted forever by the unspeakable crime to which she was a willing party.
5
posted on
10/10/2002 9:30:51 AM PDT
by
pgkdan
To: Bush2000
She wanted to know nothing of her own actions and when put in hewr face, it was something she will never forget.
6
posted on
10/10/2002 9:47:48 AM PDT
by
A CA Guy
To: Bush2000
"That image will live with me forever."
Well good! If more women knew the TRUTH about abortion and what they are doing, maybe some would think twice. If there was nothing wrong with abortion, then the woman would not have been upset by the site of her aborted CHILD.
It sort of makes you wonder if this is the sort of thing she saw (warning - graphic):
http://www.prolife.org.uk/abortionThumbnails.htm
To: Bush2000
Good. She deserves to be jarred by the sight of her murdered baby.
8
posted on
10/10/2002 9:56:35 AM PDT
by
Consort
To: Jimer
Despite the fact that this is the sixth posting of this story, it is tough to be confronted with the consequences on one's choices, isn't it.
To: Bush2000
"Unfortunately, the products of conception from your termination were in a labelled jar ready to be sent to pathology and awaiting collection. "the products of conception" - read "BABY"
"the products of conception from your termination" - read "MURDERED BABY"
To: Bush2000
Or they could have considered either a tubal ligation for her or a vasectomy for him PRIOR to getting pregnant a FOURTH time.
So she blames the hospital for feeling guilty about it? If she had a conscience, she wouldn't have to see the evidence anyway. Worrying about the burdon of an additional child is a normal concern, abortion is a convenience afforded by the devil that exploits that concern.
I'm not too convinced about imagery being effective though. She was probably more mortified by the fact that the bottle actually had HER name on it.
11
posted on
10/10/2002 10:27:44 AM PDT
by
Jake0001
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
To: Jesus. Enough said.
JESUS. ENOUGH SAID. WROTE: "I'm not going to be to judging on this---I'm gonna leave that to God and Jesus. They'll deal with this woman when her time comes. That's all we can do, really. Be patient and let God and Jesus do their thing."
I am beginning to think that we need to go after the HEARTS of the first abortion "victims"---the abortion mothers. I believe that most don't REALLY KNOW what the pre-aborted BABY looks like---or that it REALLY IS a baby. After all, they have been told for YEARS that it's "just a mass of tissue."
I think we need to DEMAND that state legislatures make laws REQUIRING that ALL pre-abortion mothers be shown (and initial) UNDENIABLE, FACTUAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE of post-abortion BABIES (CLEARLY showing hands, feet, bodies, etc.)---BEFORE their OWN abortion---and then let them make their own decision. I think most would change their HEARTS and minds FOREVER.
In 1974, I was VERY pro-ABORTION. Then, I had to do a simulated radio broadcast on a controversial topic, and I chose abortion. I thought it would be a piece of cake...I would put those "right-wing-religious-nuts" to SHAME!
We had to present BOTH sides fairly and were NOT allowed to be biased in our presentation. (You know, like journalists are SUPPOSED to do!)
I KNEW the abortion argument---I had been PRO-ABORTION all my life. But after forcing myself to see the "other side," I realized how 100% WRONG I had been. I did a 180 and became PRO-LIFE over night and have remained so ever since!
I have VERY seriously been considering running for office. If I do, I will fight for a "Women's Right to KNOW"...what an abortion REALLY does and what that CHILD REALLY looked like...It INSTANTLY changed MY mind 100%---FOREVER!
To: Jesus. Enough said.
I'm not going to be to judging on this...
I am. I think what this woman did was pathetic. And it's even worse that she doesn't grasp the reality of the situation. In her mind, the real tragedy is that she saw the jar -- not that her dead child was contained within it. I don't hate her for her sin. But I do feel better that she isn't around me.
14
posted on
10/10/2002 11:13:07 AM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: Bush2000
BUSH2000 WROTE: "I think what this woman did was pathetic. And it's even worse that she doesn't grasp the reality of the situation. In her mind, the real tragedy is that she saw the jar -- not that her dead child was contained within it."
ALL abortions are pathetic!
But was there EVER a time when YOU didn't know what an abortion REALLY did? There was for me. (See #13 on http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/766626/posts?page=12#12)
I thought---just as the pro-aborts say---that it was "just a mass of tissue."
It was not until I *** SAW *** what that alleged "mass of tissue" REALLY looked like, that I UNDERSTOOD that there REALLY IS A BABY there.
Blame the MONEY-GRABBING ABORTION DOCTORS and NURSES. THEY KNOW that they are KILLING BABIES---and don't care!
I believe that many of the abortion "mothers" REALLY DON'T KNOW---but they SHOULD BE TOLD the TRUTH and SHOWN the TRUTH!
Change their HEARTS, then we can change Roe v Wade and the STATE laws.
To: Bush2000
Rush was just talking about this story on his show
16
posted on
10/10/2002 11:47:44 AM PDT
by
Mo1
To: Concerned
I think we need to DEMAND that state legislatures make laws REQUIRING that ALL pre-abortion mothers be shown (and initial) UNDENIABLE, FACTUAL, PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE of post-abortion BABIES (CLEARLY showing hands, feet, bodies, etc.)---BEFORE their OWN abortion---and then let them make their own decision. I think most would change their HEARTS and minds FOREVER. I totally disagree. I would no more show abortion pictures to a woman about to have one than I would show pictures of any kind of surgery to someone about to undergo it.
Why wouldn't pictures of fetal development suffice?
17
posted on
10/10/2002 12:10:38 PM PDT
by
Dianna
To: Spiff
You're right - that image will live with you forever. You will spend eternity pondering the enormity of your crime of murdering your own child. I guess you just got a little preview in the hospital.
While I'm absolutely against abortion, it's attitudes like yours that damage some people's faith and prevents others from even accepting Christ as their Savior. Who died and made you God? Maybe seeing her dead baby will lead this woman to a saving relationship with her Maker. If anything, we should say a prayer for her. Now, I don't consider myself a good Christian. I have a lot of bitterness in my life, but damned if I'm going to condemn this lady. And damned if I'm going to fellowship with those who do.
18
posted on
10/10/2002 12:23:38 PM PDT
by
Hemlock
To: Concerned
I agree with you. I also changed my mind about abortion. The fact is people are lied to about what abortion is, how it is performed and the levels of the baby's development. This is especially true in Britain, which is overwhelmingly pro-abort. This woman will experience a lifetime of guilt and pain and then will have to face God.
The law requires more truth and disclosure over buying a share of stock than over the life and death decision of abortion. To refer to her aborted baby as the"products of conception from your termination" is grotesque.
To: Spiff
You're right - that image will live with you forever. You will spend eternity pondering the enormity of your crime of murdering your own child. I guess you just got a little preview in the hospital.
While I'm absolutely against abortion, it's attitudes like yours that damage some people's faith and prevent others from even accepting Christ as their Savior. Who died and made you God? Maybe seeing her dead baby will lead this woman to a saving relationship with her Maker. If anything, we should say a prayer for her. Now, I don't consider myself a good Christian. I have a lot of bitterness in my life, but damned if I'm going to condemn this lady. And damned if I'm going to fellowship with those who do.
20
posted on
10/10/2002 12:29:13 PM PDT
by
Hemlock
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson