To: 1bigdictator; The Great Satan
Could all the denials about Atta meeting al Ani in Prague have been meant to protect this source?
To: 1bigdictator
bump
5 posted on
10/09/2002 9:12:03 AM PDT by
Maelstrom
To: 1bigdictator
Every congress critter who complains about this administration not sharing intelligence information should receive this story. But then every one of them has been briefed on the importance of not leaking classified information anyway and the leaks from venal types continues.
To: 1bigdictator
It's refreshing to know the press is biased in other countries also.
One source said at least one person with links to Al Qaida was providing information to the Czech government. But that agent had been lost, the source said.
What does that mean? Is this their simpleton way of saying he's been KILLED?"Lost" is pretty vague. "I lost my keys on the beach and never found them again" compared to " That Agent has been lost".See?
8 posted on
10/09/2002 9:22:31 AM PDT by
Pagey
To: 1bigdictator
"that agent had been lost" -- they mean tortured to death.
To: 1bigdictator; knighthawk; swarthyguy
up-your-alley Ping.
To: 1bigdictator
Stupid disgusting press....very sad news when an agent is killed...worse yet when it could have been prevented by the press keeping their traps shut. Guess they have no version of "loose lips shink ships" slogan over there.
To: 1bigdictator
One source attributed the leak to sensationalistic press outlets in Prague that published the list without regard for national security.Sounds like our liberal press. Secretly (in or case- openly) side with the enemy (and get out the Democrat vote).
To: Alamo-Girl
ping
22 posted on
10/09/2002 12:58:42 PM PDT by
anymouse
To: Lion's Cub; Shermy
fyi
24 posted on
10/09/2002 2:04:11 PM PDT by
piasa
To: 1bigdictator; aristeides
Thanks for the ping.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson