Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NJ Supreme Court Hearing Live Thread
New Jersey Public TV ^ | 10/02/02 | TonyInOhio

Posted on 10/02/2002 7:04:20 AM PDT by TonyInOhio

New Jersey Public TV is carrying this hearing live. Click on Watch Live Online, and post what you hear, here.


Tony


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: demonrats; election; fixisin; forrester; fraud; greasetheskids; igotyourparadigm; lautenberg; ratcrimes; steal; stealingelection; toricelli
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 1,281-1,293 next last
To: rintense
More like what's in the RAT's best interest. Finally, somebody gets to speak for Forrester.
461 posted on 10/02/2002 8:29:17 AM PDT by McLynnan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
PROUD to be a resident of Somerset County! :) Hey, if I have to live in NJ, I picked the right place. Actually, Bush only won Somerset by a few points (must have been some cheating going on), but Hunterdon was a landslide, like 70/30.

Doug Forrester lawyers up!
462 posted on 10/02/2002 8:29:22 AM PDT by agrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Just thought you would like to know that Republican consultant Alex Calistanos (sp?) was on Fox and used the term "BAIT AND SWITCH!!"

Somebody at the RNC MUST be reading these threads!!!

463 posted on 10/02/2002 8:29:25 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: Jimer
If necessary, the Mob will finance it.

There is no “mob” in New Jersey.

The “construction industry” and “waste haulers” will be happy to pick up the tab though.

464 posted on 10/02/2002 8:29:29 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73; dubyaismypresident; Congressman Billybob
Pinging Congressman Billy Bob! We have a disenfranchised voter on aisle six! Will this help your filing the appeal with SCOTUS?
465 posted on 10/02/2002 8:29:36 AM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: joyce11111
GOP says voters have a choice NOW. Justices too stupid to figure this out. Justices saying keeping Torch on the ballot is a fruad ????!!! LOL
466 posted on 10/02/2002 8:29:41 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies]

To: twyn1
Great show.... I'm getting the DVDs for the last three seasons and thank you Rush, for that shameless plug! ;-) Needless to say, life in New Jersey is stranger than fiction.
467 posted on 10/02/2002 8:29:48 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes
Thanks, let's see how it goes. I'll start working on a suggested "fax vote".
468 posted on 10/02/2002 8:30:01 AM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
HAHA, Great idea! Anyone got a fax number?
469 posted on 10/02/2002 8:30:19 AM PDT by TheLurkerX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies]

To: Don'tMessWithTexas
I think there are Seven.
470 posted on 10/02/2002 8:30:25 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
You know, if the GOP made an argument to replace a perceived losing candidate nominated earlier in the primary on grounds of a deficit in the polls, it'd be laughed out of the courthouse for even making the argument and being subjected to national scorn for trying to "fix" an election. Well then, why isn't it happening to the Democrats? That's basically what they're doing here and its all self-interested partisanship, not principle.

Because the american media is a wholly owned subsidiary of the DNC.
Same (and only) reason Clinton stayed in office.
471 posted on 10/02/2002 8:30:32 AM PDT by MamaLucci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: pittsburgh gop guy
But I thought the Attorney Generall said that the Democrats should pay for it since they are the ones seeking "relief".

So that will make it o.k. according to the AG, the Dems. buy the courts and the election? Voters will see this as "fair" if the Dems. pay $$$?

472 posted on 10/02/2002 8:30:41 AM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Just called. Said I can't believe they are really hearing this. Said it was like throwing a forward pass, and then saying, Oh, I didn't like the way I threw that, let me throw it again. It stinks."
473 posted on 10/02/2002 8:30:44 AM PDT by Tuscaloosa Goldfinch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
The governor has already made his choice - it's Lautenberg. I saw it on TV last night.
474 posted on 10/02/2002 8:30:44 AM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73
See #303.

I hope someone in the Republican Party is ready to move on this VERY QUICKLY if Lautenberg ends up on the ballot.

475 posted on 10/02/2002 8:30:47 AM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: mwl1
Just called and told them it's outrageous we have to pay for mistakes democrats have made.
Person wasn't really helpful.
476 posted on 10/02/2002 8:30:57 AM PDT by dyed_in_the_wool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
The reason they don't "have a choice" is because the polls have shown they chose the republican and the dems want another shot.
477 posted on 10/02/2002 8:31:07 AM PDT by KsSunflower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Howlin, I'm looking for your help here. Just got home for a few minutes and have to go back out (darn it). A previous thread in FR mentioned that the NJSC was polling on a nationwide basis regarding this matter. I called from my car phone and spoke with someone who is taking calls. Their # is 609 292 4837. Please spread the word and the number (if it hasn't already been spread around). THANK YOU!
478 posted on 10/02/2002 8:31:11 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
The current question of ths statute that provides for filling a vacancy within 30 days implies another statute would allow an election within 30 days. Therefore NJ has one statute requiring an election within 30 days and another statute that limits it to 51 days. It implies that 30 days is previously recognized as adequate time to conduct an election.

Wasn't that 51 days statute added in order to conform to some FEDERAL law?

479 posted on 10/02/2002 8:31:19 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci
GOP lawyer stumbling a bit, justices keep interrupting him.
480 posted on 10/02/2002 8:31:28 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 1,281-1,293 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson