Posted on 10/01/2002 5:28:29 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
Just last week top Democrats were in high dungeon over what they said was President Bush's accusation they didn't care about national security. But now that Congressman Jim McDermott has given them a chance to prove that sentiment wrong, party leaders have gone AWOL.
Just yesterday, Senior Senate Republican Trent Lott said McDermott's contention that Bush would lie to get the U.S. into a war, delivered from Baghdad no less, constituted "aiding an abetting the enemy." Lott compared the Democrat left-winger to "Hanoi Jane" Fonda.
A day earlier, the Senate's number two GOP'er, Don Nickles, said McDermott's comments made him sound Saddam Hussein's chief propaganda minister.
Reaction so far from top Democrats? Stone cold silence.
Could this be the party of Sen. Tom Daschle, who roared on the Senate floor last week that national security was so near and dear to him and his colleagues that any assertions to the contrary were "outrageous."
What about presidential hopeful Sen. John Edwards, who said Saturday night that he found the Bush comments "infuriating?" If Sen. Edwards is likewise infuriated by Rep. McDermott's aiding and abetting of Saddam, he has yet to say so out loud.
It's stand-up-and-be-counted time for the national security Democrats. And the longer they stay silent about "Hanoi Jane" McDermott, the more appropriate it is to question their national security credentials.




High dungeon? Is that in Scotland somehwere? The proper phrase is "high dudgeon".
Dudgeon: A sullen, angry, or indignant humor.
You can't just tease us with a little leg like that, chemanius--we want full frontal! What are you talking about in this sentence?
Trent Lott is the best we can do? Mr "36 days or something like that..?"
Where in the hell is Mr Cheney? Where is the freakin Secy of State!!
It is codified in 18 U.S.C. Sec. 953
Sec. 953. Private correspondence with foreign governments
Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. This section shall not abridge the right of a citizen to apply, himself or his agent, to any foreign government or the agents thereof for redress of any injury which he may have sustained from such government or any of its agents or subjects.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.