***The Gov. Of New Jersey Says: What Law?***

Stardate: 0210.1

[The Wizard]

What laws, this is Jersey, the papers say it's ok, that's all we needs...

The crooks have been running the state so long they think that laws don't count.......

This is the most amazing thing I have ever seen the democrats do....

Attention Dasshole:

The Democrats don't obey the law....

[SouthernFreebird]

Could we get an interpreter in here?????

[The Wizard]

I just watched this guy say there are no laws in Jersey, you got the bucks we can work it out.......

The Govenor of the state.....and ED Hill on Fox and Friends flat out told him it's illegal and he said yeah there's something about 51 days, but we made a mistake so we think every person has the right to choose between two major candidates......

A blatant action to ignore the law

[AppyPappy]

Are you series?

[Always Right]

The law is not what is important, we need the balance of power between the parties according to the Democratic Govenor citing a leftist New York Time's article as if it the established law of the land.

[The Wizard]

once you're 51 days before the election or less, it is against the law to change the ballot.

[The Wizard]

right....exactly, these people are just crooks

[Always Right]

At least he ruled out Clinton and The Boss as running........

[ladtx]

Laws? Wee don' need no steeeking laws.

[Always Right]

Laws? Wee don' need no steeeking laws.

When you have the Govenor, the Attorney General and the State Supreme Court on your side, the Law is whatever you say it is.

[uncbob]

The GOP going to be reimbursed for all the funds they spent campaigning against the Torch ?????
They ought to sue BIG TIME

[Diogenesis]

"THIS JUST IN. Ms Albright and X42 will discuss what the Democrats think of the Law."

[freedomcrusader]

I agree with you, except I'd say "in your pocket" instead of "on your side".

[uncbob]

we think every person has the right to choose between two major candidates......

Well you guys voted for him in the Primary

[copycat]

The press were asking the most amazing questions... "Is it fair that the people don't get a choice between two candidates?" "Are you really going to try and get this law enforced?" "Shouldn't the people have a choice?"

In effect, their questions revealed that, in their opinion, the law should be bent for Democrat purposes.

[apillar]

Well they could run Hillary Clinton for the Senate seat. Of course then she would hold two Senate Seats, there is a law against that but who cares?

In fact why not just skip the election and declare Hillary the New Jersey and New York Senator for life. What ?!? There is a law against that ? Why should some silly old law written by a bunch of dead ol' white guys matter.

Sarcasm off...

[Godfollow]

How is this any different from how the South was run during the era of "The Mississippi Burning"? Aint none!!!

[leprechaun9]

There was a Primary election back in June and the Democrap Party selected the TORCH as the person that best represents their ideals and what they stand for. The TORCH is the very essence of the Democrap Party!

They are so alike: the TORCH, Dasshole, Traitor McDermott,etc.

[dawn53]

I said it once this morning, but I'll repeat myself.

If Forrester is 13 points ahead in the polls because he's made the election an "ethics" debate, won't this action by the Dems just intensify that "ethics" question? But this time the debate will be directed at the entire Democratic sleaze machine instead of just Toricelli.

[Howlin]

we think every person has the right to choose between two major candidates......

It appears the voters were doing just that -- and the Democrats didn't like the way the outcome was looking.