Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Torricelli News Conference 5 pm EST LIVE THREAD

Posted on 09/30/2002 9:20:19 AM PDT by alisasny

Opine away : )


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: cheesewithwhine; dontcry; idlke2thnktheacademy; imabigbaby; imacrookshhh; imaproudcrook; myeulogy; notmyfault; opuslist; walkitoffson; whatwouldwilliedo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 2,041-2,043 next last
To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
Whew, I'm glad you caved 'cause that was all I had......... lol

I'm just too easygoing.

561 posted on 09/30/2002 1:06:33 PM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 555 | View Replies]

To: Dog
EVERY NJ CONGRESSMAN HAS TURNED DOWN THE DEMS!!!!!!

They know this plan will never fly. Why should any of them give up his House seat?

562 posted on 09/30/2002 1:06:56 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 556 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
They'll sure try it. Someone said on another thread said the SCONJ has a Republican majority.
563 posted on 09/30/2002 1:07:00 PM PDT by LisaFab
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 543 | View Replies]

To: Dog
another poster just stated that Bradley turned it down too...
564 posted on 09/30/2002 1:07:39 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 556 | View Replies]

To: Dog
"On Local Philly News their reporter just reported that EVERY NJ CONGRESSMAN HAS TURNED DOWN THE DEMS!!!!!!"

Yes, but it's still too early to tell if that is good news or bad news.

Did they turn it down because they knew it would look bad, or did they turn it down because some political "untouchable" (e.g. Lisa Beamer, though I don't mean to slander her) is going to get the nod?

565 posted on 09/30/2002 1:07:53 PM PDT by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 556 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
You know assistants have been phoning him on the plane -- he'll take their calls.

Exactly. If Bill's the one (I'm making no predictions), then these folks will have set something up -- the dramatic surprise call, or some such. It'd take Forrester out of the news for days.

566 posted on 09/30/2002 1:08:01 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 558 | View Replies]

To: teletech
So, what will Torch do if no suitable replacement can be found?
567 posted on 09/30/2002 1:08:08 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies]

To: LisaFab
Someone said on another thread said the SCONJ has a Republican majority.

I can hear it now, can't you?

568 posted on 09/30/2002 1:08:18 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: Dog
Every 'Rat Congressman turned them down? Even that smarmy one who stole the election down in South Central New Jersey last time round? What was his name?...

If that's true, they really have no shot with this thing.

569 posted on 09/30/2002 1:08:32 PM PDT by gridlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 556 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
The other thing about this is whether the Democrats will drag the media into the slime with them. How will the media cover this? Will they cheer the Democrats on or question the tactics? Will they focus on the loopholes and make it sound legal or will they focus on the voters and question the shenanigans?

-PJ

570 posted on 09/30/2002 1:08:39 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 546 | View Replies]

To: LisaFab
That would make sense, since Whitman had control of the appointments until 2001.

So suddenly, the Rats plan is foiled by not having a sympathetic court. Ha!

I still say this press conference will be really smarmy.

571 posted on 09/30/2002 1:08:52 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: LisaFab
They'll sure try it. Someone said on another thread said the SCONJ has a Republican majority.

I'd assume that most of that court was appointed by Christie Todd Whitless....

572 posted on 09/30/2002 1:09:13 PM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

Writmeister has settled it. From another thread:
The United States Code mandates that the federal general elections be held on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. 2 USC §1, 7. The United States Constitution proscribes six-year terms of office and the placement of seats in specific classes mandating the end of their terms. US Const. Art I §3(1) & (2).

The United States Supreme Court has interpreted the Times, Place and Manner clause as mandating the November general election and held that any conflicting state stautes are inoperative so far as the conflict extends. Foster v. Love, 532 US 67, 118 SC 464, 139 LE2d 369 (1997).

McGreevey cannot appoint anyone for a 6-year-and-three-month term. The election must take place as scheduled on November 5. End of story.

573 posted on 09/30/2002 1:09:39 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Did they turn it down because they knew it would look bad

Most likely, because they'd be giving up their sure chances of election to the House for a toss-of-the-dice chance at the Senate.

Nobody in their right mind would do that. It'd have to be somebody who's not currently in office.

574 posted on 09/30/2002 1:10:18 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 565 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
So, what will Torch do if no suitable replacement can be found?

Could McGreevy appoint himself?

575 posted on 09/30/2002 1:10:28 PM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]

To: LisaFab
Someone said they thought the New Jersey Supremes had been stacked with Christy Whitman appointees (could be RINOS)
576 posted on 09/30/2002 1:10:47 PM PDT by tip of the sword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: teletech
Could all the delays with Torch's press conference be because they can't find a replacement?
577 posted on 09/30/2002 1:11:03 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
Sen. Springsteen, anyone?
578 posted on 09/30/2002 1:11:04 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
How many times can they kick the ball down the road ?

I mean . . it's like ya run your election and if you're down in the polls by 14 (as torch is) you just ask the party to pull you and do it all again in a few months.

At theis pase, the DNC could run the entire cast of the sopranos through this revolving door untill they get soneone that wins. No ?

579 posted on 09/30/2002 1:11:23 PM PDT by ChadGore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Why not!
580 posted on 09/30/2002 1:11:28 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 575 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 2,041-2,043 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson