Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Safire: Selling Our Secrets
The New York Times ^ | 09/30/2002 | William Safire

Posted on 09/29/2002 6:56:53 PM PDT by Pokey78

WASHINGTON
They never learn.

Remember, a couple of years ago, the scandals about the way corporate giants like Hughes Electronics and Loral Space, led by big Democratic contributors, sold secret U.S. satellite technology to Chinese aerospace companies and semiconductor manufacturers?

Remember how right-wingers like me got all worked up about our shortsighted government and venal executives placing the interests of international trade over the needs of national defense?

I am ashamed to report that the Bush administration is getting ready to let our ever-hungry multinationals do the same thing. This time, however, it would all be legalized. If current legislation (Senate 149, the Export Administration Act) being urged by the White House passed, American executives would be encouraged to sell the fruits of their most advanced research to foreign nationals who may not wish us well.

The arguments used by the merchants of American defense technology: (1) selling technology overseas that is "mass marketed" here helps bring down our unit cost at home, as well as benefits business; (2) we're only selling it for good uses, even though its "dual use" could help them penetrate our defenses; (3) "foreign availability" — they could always buy something almost as good from the Germans or French.

What's more, say the sell-anybody-anything advocates in the Clinton-Bush Commerce Department, because we have an embargo on sales to Iraq, relaxed export rules won't help Saddam.

Last things first: Iraq buys dual-use nuclear components through cutouts who could easily buy them from us. Take high-strength aluminum tubes, for example, which can be used in bicycles — but a thousand of them in easily hidden gas centrifuges can produce enough weapons-grade uranium for one nuclear bomb every year. Under the proposed law, a country like Russia or Jordan could buy ours and re-sell them to Saddam with no weapons inspectors the wiser.

You like the composite glass fibers in your tennis racquet? A sinister use is to form the rotors of those centrifuges, and their export has been controlled for 20 years. No more, if those who would sell our technology to multifarious middlemen have their way.

Nor would our embargo on shipments to Iraq stop our leakage of secrets. China's Huawei Technologies, which could not have been built for a decade without exported American technology, violated the U.N. embargo by selling fiber optic products to Saddam. He now uses them in his air defense system to jeopardize U.S. pilots.

We should not fall for the "dual use" dodge. Germany's Siemens, reported Gary Milhollin of the watchdog Wisconsin Project, legally sold Saddam krytron electronic switches, which doctors now use to destroy kidney stones. When Iraq then sought 120 more as "spare parts," it dawned on Siemens that the switches are also used in setting off the chain reaction in nuclear weapons.

Bush can say that in his 2000 campaign he promised business leaders to lift export controls. But that was before Sept. 11. Now those controls — which worked well for decades against the Soviets — need strengthening, not weakening. Perhaps our National Security Council has been getting pressure from India and Pakistan, each of which wants our missile technology. By accommodating these nuclear powers, we might gain two allies but would make the world more dangerous.

America does not need this dirty business. It amounts to only a few billion dollars in sales, and its military misuse — through copycat "reverse engineering," a Chinese specialty — costs American taxpayers far more than that to defend against.

A handful of hard-line senators (Jon Kyl, Jesse Helms, Richard Shelby, John McCain and Fred Thompson) wrote Bush this month to stop pushing this bill this year. They urged instead that he create a new bill "that strikes the right balance between national security and trade" lest it cause "public divisions among strong supporters of your administration at a time when cohesiveness is an absolute necessity."

Some old hands remember the predations of yesteryear. Newcomers have to be reminded. 


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dualuse; iraq; technologytransfer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 09/29/2002 6:56:53 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

SEND HER A MESSAGE.

VOTE THE RATS OUT!!

DONATE TONIGHT.
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

2 posted on 09/29/2002 6:57:14 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
This won't get a lot of replies.
3 posted on 09/29/2002 7:10:18 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
This is pathetic. Patriotic Americans should give W. a figurative kick in the butt for this kind of stupidity.
4 posted on 09/29/2002 7:12:07 PM PDT by BenR2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
This is all part of the super secret plan to restore classical conservatism.
5 posted on 09/29/2002 7:17:10 PM PDT by Mark Felton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78; gcruse
Thanks for the post.

Remember how right-wingers like me got all worked up

I think the quote would more correctly be....

Remember how right-wingers like FREEPERS got all worked up.....

So, where are they? Shall we call them and ask?

6 posted on 09/29/2002 7:21:08 PM PDT by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
This is totally UNSAT. I thought W would at least put the cork in THIS bottle.
7 posted on 09/29/2002 7:23:52 PM PDT by Ronin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Remember how right-wingers like FREEPERS got all worked up.....
So, where are they? Shall we call them and ask?

I left a message on their machine.  They are down
at the FIVE Cent Store giving each other high FIVES.


8 posted on 09/29/2002 7:34:35 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Damn!
9 posted on 09/29/2002 7:43:21 PM PDT by Enough is ENOUGH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
First, export our jobs. Then export the technology so that they can do our jobs better.

Makes cents for the multi-nationals but not much sense for us.

10 posted on 09/29/2002 8:05:55 PM PDT by GalvestonBeachcomber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Disgusting. We're done. Nothing lasts forever! This Amerika thing was fun while it lasted, right? 200 some odd years...it was a good run.

One question...Where do we go when the smallpox and nukes hit?

11 posted on 09/29/2002 8:06:43 PM PDT by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Question? Why is Saffire writing this now -- no one is pressing for this bill to pass right now. There are more important things on the agenda.

Why doesn't he write about the RATs not passing the Budget in the Senate?

If anybody would have bothered to do a search they would have found this bill has had no activity for some time and passed out of the Senate in the fall of 2001.
12 posted on 09/29/2002 8:08:57 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Nope, I am right here saying that this is a wrong policy, if it is as Safire represents it. Calling my Congressman Burton tomorrow.
13 posted on 09/29/2002 8:09:24 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Summary of EAA Act
14 posted on 09/29/2002 8:17:38 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball
 
One question...Where do we go when the smallpox and nukes hit?

Don't worry.  Your government will be safely hidden
under a mountain so there will be continuity of
the three branches.   Oh, you mean, where do
you go?  What difference does that make?

15 posted on 09/29/2002 8:19:11 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
 no one is pressing for this bill to pass right now.

Hilarious. Saddam does not have the ability
to hit us right now either.  Say, do you do
matinees?

16 posted on 09/29/2002 8:21:09 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Clinton reauthorizes EAA Act of 1979
17 posted on 09/29/2002 8:23:08 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin
 
     Establishes an export control list for sensitive U.S. technologies

    Wonderful.  How about putting decision making back in the
    hands of the Defense department where it belongs and was
    before the Clinton-China Pact moved it to Commerce?

18 posted on 09/29/2002 8:23:46 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
ParagraphII, bullet 2
19 posted on 09/29/2002 8:30:08 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Heritage Foundation Position Paper
20 posted on 09/29/2002 8:37:21 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson