Posted on 09/25/2002 4:32:32 PM PDT by rohry
Market WrapUp for the Week
Wednesday, September 25, 2002 Market WrapUp The Daily Drivel Most company earnings are suffering because of three factors:
If you leave out all of these factors, then you get down to the pro forma numbers, which are rising but at a slower pace than estimated. The reason pro forma numbers are going up is due to cost cutting, especially payroll cuts. Revenue growth at most companies has been sluggish. So for the markets to make a big deal out of GEs numbers, it is really no big deal. It is simply noise and nothing more. Markets are driven in the short-term by news, and todays announcement by GE doesnt make a trend. So, Why DID The Markets Rally? Wall Street is hoping to keep the little guy fully invested so you hear stories about the market being up 20% by the end of the year. That is not going to happen unless the government starts buying stocks like what is now happening in Japan. To go from a 27% deficit as we now have on the S&P 500, to a 20% gain by year-end is simply drivel. Most, if not all, analysts and strategists have been consistently wrong these past three years. I dont see anything on the horizon that is going to give us our miracle recovery. Maybe well start trading on pro forma sales numbers next. Forget the expenses. Why not go with sales and exclude everything else? The mantra that stocks are cheap will be addressed in the final installment of Bubble Troubles. If stocks were cheap, the big boys would be buying, and there is no evidence that this is happening at the moment. What is most evident with all that is said in print or the broadcast media is that investors are still bullish. Every word spoken reinforces the equity cult with standard clichés such as stocks are cheap, or, you have to stay invested for the long-term, or the economy is in good shape, and we are oversold. Nobody talks about P/E ratios at historical levels or that dividend yields are extremely low. Everyone is carrying on as if these last few years have been a correction in an otherwise long-term bull market. I hate to tell these bubbleheads, but the bull market ended in the first quarter of 2000. If they want to maintain their customer base or their listening audience, they better start talking about the bear market and how they can keep their client portfolio losses to a minimum. Telling investors to buy tech stocks or to stay fully invested in stocks because they are a bargain is going to lose their clients' money. This is also going to cause them to lose their customer base.
In case anybody hasnt noticed, the Dow has lost 13.4% since its August 22 high of 9053.64. Weve lost over 1,200 points in the last month. A slowing economy, declining profits, a retrenching consumer, a Brazilian debt default, another default by Argentina, a derivative mishap, and an oncoming war is what awaits the financial markets in the months ahead. That is why September and October are usually foul weather months. The realities of forecasts made at the beginning of the year get adjusted in September and October. These readjustments to reality have an impact on the markets and there are still a lot of readjustments that need to be done to re-price stocks from a second-half recovery to a second-half economic and financial relapse. Three companies out of four have cut their third quarter estimates, according to a recent Bloomberg survey. If the profit recovery were going to take place, you wouldnt be getting these kinds of warnings. Fund managers could also contribute much of todays rally to quarter-end window dressing. Institutions may be driving up stocks prior to a quarterly close. Usually at the end of each quarter, fund managers dress up their portfolios in order to look better to shareholders. This year has been the third year of negative returns for most mutual fund companies, so shareholders arent too happy right now. The market remains weak technically with declining momentum, sentiment and other trend indicators showing no support for a sustainable rally. This is, in technical terms, simply a rally from oversold conditions and nothing more. Volume came in at 1.64 billion on the NYSE and 1.68 billion on the Nasdaq. Market breadth was positive by 23 to 10 on the NYSE and by 22 to 12 on the Nasdaq. Overseas Markets Asian stocks fell after a U.S. industry report showed consumer confidence dropped, signaling weakening demand for exports from the region's largest overseas market. Japan's Nikkei 225 Stock Average shed 1.7% to 9165.41. South Korea's Kospi index fell to a nine-month low, and Taiwan's TWSE Index to a 10-month low. Treasury Markets Wednesday's sole economic report revealed an unexpected 1.7% drop in August existing home sales to a 5.28 million rate, less than expectations for a 5.40 million rate. Thursday will see several reports including weekly initial claims, August durable goods orders, expected to have decreased 2.7%, and August new home sales, seen coming in at 980,000. © Copyright Jim Puplava, September 25, 2002 |
On the other hand, you have a COMPLETELY solid company like Southwest Air, which I held in the 1990s---all the while it was winning awards as the best airline on the planet---and it did not go up at all or pay significant dividends. I finally sold it, after holding for about 5 years at the same price. But this is the thing: some VERY healthy companies NEVER pay dividends, because they plow everything back into the company (see: Carnegie).
There was a fad in the sixties "One Decision Stocks" -- buy them and never sell them. Ri-i-ght. No portfolio doesn't need to be tended and weeded. And you can't buy a basket that's immune either. Baskets do bust too -- a fund that's doing well for ten years might drop like lead in one more.
Being in for the long term doesn't mean always being fully invested or high-percentage invested in stocks, nor even holding beaten down stocks without a reason more than "well I bought it for the long term." Actaully I think that avoiding the hassle of selling and what goes with it, is a good and honest reason to hold -- far more honest than the "Well I bought in for the long term." That honest reason allows a alarm to be heard at some point at least, and the desire to rescue remaining value supasses the desire to avoid hassle. Harder to surmount the pyschological barrier that the motto "in it for the long term" throws up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.