Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Accuser's former lawyer backs Torricelli on clock flap
AP via NJ.com ^ | 9/20/02 4:02 PM | LAURENCE ARNOLD

Posted on 09/20/2002 1:18:27 PM PDT by Jean S

Edited on 07/06/2004 6:37:54 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

WASHINGTON (AP) -- A former lawyer for David Chang, the chief accuser in the ethics case against Sen. Robert Torricelli, is taking the lawmaker's side in a lingering dispute over whether he accepted a $3,600 clock in violation of Senate rules.


(Excerpt) Read more at nj.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: davidchang

1 posted on 09/20/2002 1:18:28 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Extinguish The Torch

2 posted on 09/20/2002 1:29:27 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I don't think all this information is going to help the Torch. It's just keeping the scandals on the 'front burner'. Freegards....
3 posted on 09/20/2002 1:48:59 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Chang claims Critchley and other former lawyers worked secretly with Torricelli to undermine his defense

The former lawyer seems to confirm this allegation by his current actions in undermining Chang.

4 posted on 09/20/2002 1:55:17 PM PDT by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Chang claims Critchley and other former lawyers worked secretly with Torricelli to undermine his defense.

This is the operative sentence.

5 posted on 09/20/2002 1:59:11 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: San Jacinto
The fact that the Torch has a taste for $3,000 clocks doesn't help his image much though. And this sleazy acquaintance doesn't make him look good either.
6 posted on 09/20/2002 2:04:57 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Critchley said he found in his files about 10 canceled Bright & Bright checks from May to August, 1996, all for travel expenses, and all made out to cash. One was for $3,600. Others were for $3,300, $3,000, $3,400 and $3,380.

Uh, maybe they were all bribes.

7 posted on 09/20/2002 2:11:38 PM PDT by gridlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Bright and Bright seems more like Dumb and Dumber
8 posted on 09/20/2002 2:14:15 PM PDT by pikachu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Torricelli, accompanied by Chang and using cash, bought the clock three days later at a Lambertville, N.J., antiques store for $3,600, plus tax.

The only thing I can afford in Lambertville is brealfast at Sneddon's. (one egg)

9 posted on 09/20/2002 2:21:18 PM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stentor
breakfast.
10 posted on 09/20/2002 2:22:16 PM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
I don't think all this information is going to help the Torch. It's just keeping the scandals on the 'front burner'. Freegards....

Exactly. Ain't it sweet? :-)

Forrester - 52%, Torricelli - 38%

11 posted on 09/20/2002 2:29:00 PM PDT by Coop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; JeanS
Go Doug! Go Doug!

NJ, it's time to put out the Torch!

BTTMA! (Bump To The Moon, Alice!)

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

12 posted on 09/20/2002 2:35:13 PM PDT by LonePalm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Decent people of New Jersy, I'm sorry for all the bad things I said about you!

Another point people forget about: REAL economics, the Reagan Tax Cut.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/754065/posts

13 posted on 09/20/2002 2:50:18 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Critchley, who insists Torricelli played no role in matching him up with Chang...

Maybe so... nevertheless:

"[L]awyers familiar with the case said the prosecutors had repeatedly raised the possibility of a conflict of interest in the fact that Mr. Critchley, the trial lawyer who represented Mr. Chang until he agreed to cooperate with the government, has been a supporter of and fund-raiser for Mr. Torricelli." (The New York Times, February 7, 2001)

14 posted on 09/20/2002 3:11:33 PM PDT by Politico2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Politico2
In addition to the questionable match up of a Torch fundraiser as the initial defense attorney to Chang :

a) whether Critchley is an Ex- attorney or not, isn't he still bound by attorney-client privelege? Isn't it totally unethical to reveal ANYTHING in a clint's files ( former or not) without the client's permission? How can he get away with revealing facts about these other checks in Chang's file?????

b) remember that when this whole thing started, Torch claimed Chang was "his friend" and wasn't going nuclear after him....it was only when Chang started letting assorted & sundry cats out of multiple bags that the "defense" strategy changed....demonize Chang at all cost...give Chang credit for seeing the writing on the wall & switching counsel before it was too late.
15 posted on 09/21/2002 9:50:57 AM PDT by bioprof
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bioprof
I don't know about (a) but it would seem so, but interesting point(b). Do you notice that when Torricelli's friends become political liabilities, he has no hesitation to cut them off -- Chang, the MEK, and the West Point guy... Surely you know the West Point guy...
16 posted on 09/21/2002 1:02:48 PM PDT by Politico2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Politico2
Ok, OK....I don't know YET who the West Point guy is.

However, I give myself until tomorrow to find out ( unless someone else wants to be kind & post it for me! ).

Homework.........
17 posted on 09/21/2002 5:12:15 PM PDT by bioprof
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson