Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Tear Falls, But President Holds Tightly to His Image (gag alert)
The New York Times ^ | 9/11/2002 | Caryn James

Posted on 09/11/2002 10:31:50 AM PDT by Utah Girl

When Scott Pelley asks President Bush about his first visit to ground zero, three days after the attacks, he begins, "You had been briefed on ground zero," and even before he finishes the question, Mr. Bush is shaking his head.

"You couldn't brief anybody on ground zero," Mr. Bush says. "It was ghostly. It was like you were having a bad dream and you were walking through the dream." Speaking slowly, he is clearly haunted by those memories, and he seems moved and engaged. It's one of only two moments shown in this much-hyped exclusive interview when he does.

Mr. Pelley had two interviews with the president, the first a couple of weeks ago on Air Force One and another last week in the Oval Office. The president granted the interviews after he turned down similar requests from other news organizations, including The New York Times. The hourlong program shaped around them (to be shown on "60 Minutes II" tonight on CBS, just before the president is scheduled to speak live) is a typical magazine report chronicling the president's experience on Sept. 11 and in the days after, padded with interviews with others in the administration. Despite the president's sound bites, the report is similar to half a dozen others.

Substantively, the program is frustrating because the president and his aides stay relentlessly on message, that message being that Mr. Bush resolved to seek justice in the first minutes after learning of the attacks, even as he was reading to second-graders in a Florida classroom.

"What was going through your mind?" Mr. Pelley asks about that moment.

Mr. Bush says: "That we're at war. And that somebody had dared attack us, and we're going to do something about it."

With that unwavering message echoing through the hour, it's the sidelights that become fascinating: details of what happened behind the scenes that day; the colloquial language that is so calculated a part of the Bush image; the scene of the president weeping as Mr. Pelley interviews him on Air Force One, offering a glimpse behind the presidential persona that may be more revealing than he intended.

As the report reconstructs Sept. 11, weaving all the interviews together, it creates a visceral sense of how frantically the government was scrambling for information, both on Air Force One and in the White House bunker, where the vice president and others had been taken. Air-traffic controllers feared that as many as 11 planes might have been hijacked, and the president ordered military jets to shoot down hijacked planes if they had to. Condoleezza Rice, the national security adviser, was in the bunker, and she recalls that when the flight crashed in Pennsylvania, its passengers apparently attempting to take it back from the hijackers, "there was that horrible time when we wondered if Flight 93 had indeed been shot down by an American pilot."

Much of the reconstruction of what happened on Air Force One that day comes second-hand. The Secret Service decided it was too risky for the plane to return to Washington, to Mr. Bush's frustration. Mr. Pelley says, "At one point he was overheard saying, `The American people want to know where their dang president is.' " He doesn't say who overheard it.

But Ari Fleischer, the White House press secretary, happily becomes the source for two other colorful quotations. The president ordered Mr. Fleischer to take notes, so there would be a historical record. Mr. Pelley says that according to those notes, Mr. Bush told the vice president on the phone: "We're at war, Dick. We're going to find out who did this and" (less politely) kick their behinds.

When Mr. Bush decided to fly back to the White House late that afternoon, the language Mr. Fleischer quotes is so cartoonish that Mr. Pelley asks, "Come on, he really said, `I don't want a tin-horn terrorist to keep me out of Washington?' "

Mr. Fleischer insists, "That's verbatim."

With so much language from the Old West, it's not surprising that some people worried Mr. Bush would shoot first and ask questions later. Mr. Pelley points out that some in the Pentagon were concerned that the president might immediately launch missiles toward Osama bin Laden, a tactic that had failed before. Mr. Bush seems amused and says offhandedly, "There's a lot of Nervous Nellies at the Pentagon anyway, a lot of people like to chatter."

His real message is that he's in charge. He says, "I knew exactly what had to be done, Scott, and that was to set a strategy to seek justice, find out who did it, hunt 'em down and bring them to justice."

The only time Mr. Pelley penetrates beyond that message is during one intense sequence on Air Force One. As they face each other, the president is hunched forward, and the close-up makes the lines is his face more visible than in the usual distant views. He recalls visiting relatives of those lost in the Word Trade Center, in those first days when the families still had hope. The president recalls that over and over they told him that their missing spouses or parents or children were tough and would find a way out of the rubble. "I had been briefed on the reality," Mr. Bush says. "I remember thinking the whole time that this is incredibly sad, because the loved ones won't come out."

Mr. Pelley then wonders if the president remembers a boy who asked him to sign a photograph of his father, a firefighter. Mr. Bush does: "I said, `Your Daddy won't believe that I was here, so you show him that autograph.' Just trying to provide a little hope."

And though the president looks straight into the camera with a gaze of utter control, he flicks a tear away from the side of his nose. The sight of a president crying is unusual and powerful enough to obscure his words. Didn't he just say he knew there was no hope? Mr. Bush and Mr. Pelley seem oblivious to the way he had given false hope to a child, a gesture that may have been understandable at the time but that is a weird thing to brag about later, wildly lacking self-awareness.

Near the end of the hour, when Mr. Pelley asks about urgent policy issues, the president's demeanor becomes stiff, even defensive. "After a year we still don't have Osama bin Laden," Mr. Pelley says, and Mr. Bush snaps at him, "How do you know that?" before backing off to say we don't know if he's dead or alive. About plans for attacking Iraq and resistance to those plans, the president reiterates, "The policy of the government is regime change." He seems determined not to make news in this interview.

As we see Mr. Pelley walking with Mr. Bush in the White House, his narration says, "The president told us that his job now is to keep reminding Americans that the nation is still at war." Despite its unexpected glimpses of emotion, this interview is a masterly example of that White House plan in action, as it insistently projects the image of a president going to war for justice.

60 MINUTES II

CBS, tonight at 8, Eastern and Pacific times; 7 Central time.

Jeff Fager, executive producer; Bill Owens, David Schneider and Paul Gallagher, producers; Scott Pelley, correspondent.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: Utah Girl
With so much language from the Old West, it's not surprising that some people worried Mr. Bush would shoot first and ask questions later.

What is this supposed to mean? That people in America's west are prone to violence. What a Westist remark!

21 posted on 09/11/2002 11:23:23 AM PDT by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Mr. Pelley then wonders if the president remembers a boy who asked him to sign a photograph of his father, a firefighter. Mr. Bush does: "I said, `Your Daddy won't believe that I was here, so you show him that autograph.' Just trying to provide a little hope."

And though the president looks straight into the camera with a gaze of utter control, he flicks a tear away from the side of his nose. The sight of a president crying is unusual and powerful enough to obscure his words. Didn't he just say he knew there was no hope? Mr. Bush and Mr. Pelley seem oblivious to the way he had given false hope to a child, a gesture that may have been understandable at the time but that is a weird thing to brag about later, wildly lacking self-awareness.

A reporter asks about an incident and Bush gives a complete, truthful recounting of it. How is that wrong? How is that bragging?

22 posted on 09/11/2002 11:24:04 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
I hate the media, too. Not even for one lousy day could they stick to positive coverage. It's disgusting. Jennings should get hate mail for his coverage today. I just couldn't believe it. Also, I cannot believe the NYers! They just can't say one kind word about the President or the administration. They seem filled with hate. I have wondered if hillary, nadler and schumer have been filling their minds with garbage about President Bush. The key is that they blame their RATS in Congress for NOTHING. Everything they are angry about is directed at President Bush. I am sad about the things they are saying on this of all days. This day could have been so special...it has been ruined.
23 posted on 09/11/2002 11:26:30 AM PDT by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
The local Fox news channel here in Utah replayed the broadcast from 9/11/2001. I watched President Bush's speech at the Pentagon, and then started going through the other channels to see what they were doing. When I saw that Peter Jennings was interviewing someone while the names were being read at Ground Zero, I turned the TV off and came to work. I am now listening to a memorial service that the Mormon Tabernacle Choir is performing today. The music is really soothing my soul.
24 posted on 09/11/2002 11:29:01 AM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
See my post # 23. I am really angry right now. I am going to get a cup of coffee and calm down. Caffeine should help, right? LOL
25 posted on 09/11/2002 11:29:43 AM PDT by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
Well, I am sticking to Fox News and having an early martini!

The American people can see for themselves how awful the mainstream media is. I refuse to watch them. I hope we can figure out a way to neutralize them soon.

Grrrrr.

26 posted on 09/11/2002 11:32:40 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
I am hoping and praying that the media is totally disconnected to the American people as a whole. That is the best I can hope for at this point. The lack of respect for the President on this special day has my mind reeling.
27 posted on 09/11/2002 11:32:57 AM PDT by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Question: Is the New York Times publicly traded? How many shares are in circulation? What is the price per share? How many freepers are there?

I am beginning to think of possibilities.

28 posted on 09/11/2002 11:33:56 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I have come to believe that Jennings is by far the worst of all of them. His total lack of respect and arrogant, nasty manner toward President Bush has me sickened. I, too, have switched to Fox. I am just hoping my anger recedes soon.
29 posted on 09/11/2002 11:34:44 AM PDT by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ladtx
You've done it now Utah Girl, you've just insulted all the gnats in the world by comparing them to media types.

teehee!! Do they make ddt for talking heads?

30 posted on 09/11/2002 11:35:07 AM PDT by justsomedude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
We need to win the lotto, and then we could buy the NY Times.
31 posted on 09/11/2002 11:35:45 AM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: justsomedude
those *pesky* talking heads that spread all those deadly viruses?
32 posted on 09/11/2002 11:35:46 AM PDT by justsomedude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth; Miss Marple
Yes, Jennings is the worst of them. That is for sure. BTW, has he read the new ABC poll findings? The one that says President Bush's approval rating is 71% Nah, didn't think so.

Jennings is total scum. He is a sanctimonious little sh*t that thinks because he can sit behind a chair and read into a TV camera that he can surmise what the American people are thinking and what they want. Hauling out NYers to criticize Bush is typical of his MO. Recall how many they hauled out after the "BUSH KNEW" crap?

GOD, I HATE THE PRESS!!!!

MM...are you really having a martini already? If you, you should be a hoot by the time the Dose comes around. LOL!

33 posted on 09/11/2002 11:40:05 AM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
We have 8 tickets in the Powerball drawing this evening. The prize is 88 million dollars. My husband bought the tickets on my birthday, September 8.

If I win, I pledge to you I will buy a controlling interest. Then I will fire Howell Raines, R.W. Apple, Adam Clymer, Frank Rich, and Maureen Dowd! I will do it with much fanfare, and have cameras present as they are forced to leave the building!!

Then I will hire Mark Steyn, Tony Blankley, Mark Halperin, and Peggy Noonan. I will place John Huang2 in the position of editor in chief, and then I will wave fondly to you all as I go back to working on my roses.

34 posted on 09/11/2002 11:40:56 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Buy it and then end it. It is nothing more than a propaganda machine for the DNC and anti-American filth. The NYT makes me sick!
35 posted on 09/11/2002 11:41:24 AM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
I will place John Huang2 in the position of editor in chief, and then I will wave fondly to you all as I go back to working on my roses.

Great choice!

36 posted on 09/11/2002 11:42:27 AM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
I am spacing the martinis, because I want to watch the President's speech tonight. That nasty woman who is using her son's death to blame everyone for the construction of the skyscrapers and the radio problems for the NYFD sent me over the edge. She has been making the rounds blaming everyone except the terrorists for her son's death.

Grrrr.

37 posted on 09/11/2002 11:44:08 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Does this lady have blond hair? I saw some woman this morning on TV just finishing up her whine, I didn't hear her whole story.
38 posted on 09/11/2002 11:46:08 AM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
O'Reilly (don't like him, still watch him) reported a study last night on his show. From his talking points:

The Center for Media and Public Affairs in D.C. did a study of the establishment media and its reporting on Iraq. Listen to this. According to the study, 72 percent of all media assessments on President Bush's Iraq policy were negative. In The New York Times, 71 percent of the coverage criticized Bush. On ABC News, 80 percent of the nightly news coverage was negative, on NBC 76 percent, and CBS was the most fair and balanced at 56 percent negative.

INFURIATING!!!

39 posted on 09/11/2002 11:47:41 AM PDT by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Sheesh...glad I missed that. I'm not paying any attention to the networks. Haven't done so for about 20 years now and I certainly don't intend to start now. CNBC and FOX NEWS is all I can handle.

Where do they find these people anyway? Sometimes I wonder if they really exist or mean what they say. Perhaps they just want to be on TV. I don't get it.

40 posted on 09/11/2002 11:47:52 AM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson