Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lunar Landing Skeptic Says 'Buzz' Aldrin Attacked Him
LA Times ^

Posted on 09/10/2002 5:31:19 AM PDT by Cagey

Beverly Hills police said they are investigating a complaint that Apollo 11 astronaut Edwin E. "Buzz" Aldrin struck a man in the face Monday after the man asked Aldrin to swear on a Bible that he had been to the moon.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: aldrin; apollo11; assault; bartsibrel; benny; buzz; buzzaldrin; corruption; crime; hoax; idiot; lunar; lunarlanding; montclair; moon; nasa; newjersey; nj; punch; punchhimharder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
Complete Article
1 posted on 09/10/2002 5:31:19 AM PDT by Cagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cagey
Sibrel said he does not believe Aldrin or anyone else has ever walked on the moon.

If this person thinks that the Moon Shot was a hoax, then no wonder some bigots claim Holocaust has never happened. I wonder if he needs proof that his great grandparents ever existed: he never met them personally, after all.

2 posted on 09/10/2002 5:36:34 AM PDT by TopQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cagey; dighton; Orual; aculeus
lunatic - adj. Suffering from lunacy; insane. [Middle English lunatik, from Old French lunatique, from Latin from Latin lnticus, from lna, moon. See leuk- in Indo-European Roots.]
3 posted on 09/10/2002 5:37:34 AM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: general_re
lunatic - adj. Suffering from lunacy; insane

Sort of like this:

Police Constable Pan Am Sketch - Monty Python's Flying Circus

Policeman: (Graham Chapman) Right. Right! RIGHT! Now then! Now then! Your turn.

Chemist: (Michael Palin) Aren't you going to say 'What's all this then?'?

Policeman: Oh! Right, what's all this, then?

Chemist: This man has been shoplifting, officer.

Policeman: Oh, he has? Yus?

Chemist: Yes.

Policeman: Are you trying to tell me my job?

Chemist: No, but he's been shoplifting.

Policeman: Look! I must warn you that anything you may say will be ignored and furthermore, given half a chance I'll put my fist through your teeth. F'tang. F'tang.

Man (Eric Idle): But officer, this man here...

Policeman: I've had enough of you. You're under arrest.

(He makes noises of plane flying and firing.)

Chemist: Officer, it wasn't him. (indicates shoplifter) He's the shoplifter.

Shoplifter: (Terry Jones) No I'm not.

Shoplifter's Mate: (sticking his head out of mac) He's not, I'm a witness.

Policeman: (to chemist) One more peep out of you and I'll do you for heresy.

Chemist: Heresy. Blimey. I didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition.

Policeman: Shut up! F'tang. F'tang. Oh, that's nice. (he takes an object off the counter and pockets it) Right. I'm taking you along to the station.

Man: What for?

Policeman: I'm charging you with illegal possession of whatever we happen to have down there. Right. Lunar module calling Buzz Aldrin. Come in. (makes plane noise again) Raindrops keep falling on my head, but that doesn't mean that my...

(Caption appears on screen: 'AN APOLOGY')

Voice Over: (John Cleese) The BBC would like to apologize to the police about the character of Police Constable Pan-Am. He was not meant to represent the average police officer. Similarly, the reference to Buzz Aldrin, the astronaut, was the product of a disordered mind and should not be construed as having any other significance. Photo of Buzz Aldrin.

(Superimposed caption on the screen: 'THE BUZZ ALDRIN SHOW STARRING BUZZ ALDRIN WITH... (CREDITS)' Cut to Gumbys as at start of show.)

Gumbys: And now for something completely different. (jump cut to female Gumbys; then back to original shot) Oh that was fun. And now (CAPTION: 'THE END') The end, The end! The end! The end!

Regards, Ivan

4 posted on 09/10/2002 5:41:20 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: general_re; dighton; aculeus
Way to go, Buzz.

To the moon, Sibrel. Now do you believe?

5 posted on 09/10/2002 5:46:33 AM PDT by Orual
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Actually, I was thinking of this:


6 posted on 09/10/2002 5:53:30 AM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
Would not fining a good telescope be a better effort for the disbeliever?

_______________________

I tell you the world is flat! Columbus had four ships, one fell off. Its all a conspiracy, a coverup..
7 posted on 09/10/2002 5:57:46 AM PDT by Greeklawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cagey; Inspector Harry Callahan; Poohbah; Orual; aculeus; general_re
;-)
8 posted on 09/10/2002 6:02:27 AM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
Sibrel said he does not believe Aldrin or anyone else has ever walked on the moon.

What's his FReeper screen name?

9 posted on 09/10/2002 6:03:06 AM PDT by Cincinatus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
Hahahaha
10 posted on 09/10/2002 6:05:17 AM PDT by Cagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
What's his FReeper screen name?

Michael Rivero :o) fsf

11 posted on 09/10/2002 6:05:48 AM PDT by Free State Four
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
FYI: Sibrel's "Evidence" and a rebuttal.
12 posted on 09/10/2002 6:06:58 AM PDT by wysiwyg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dighton
You just can't resist throwing gas on a fire, can you? ;)
13 posted on 09/10/2002 6:07:56 AM PDT by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
LOL!!!!
14 posted on 09/10/2002 6:08:36 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Greeklawyer
ould not fining a good telescope be a better effort for the disbeliever?

There isn't any telescope good enough to see anything we landed on the moon. From A site debunking the hoax believers:

Earth based telescopes should be able to see the Apollo equipment

A telescope's diffraction limited resolving power depends linearly on the aperture of the telescope. Groundbased telescopes also have to look through the murky and turbulant atmosphere so without corrective techniques that are just now becoming common in large telescopes (called adaptive optics), a telescopes resolution is limited by the atmosphere to about 0.5-1.0 arcseconds (3600 arcseconds are in one degree and 360 degrees around the whole sky). That limits groundbased telescopes to a resolution of about 2 kilometers on the moon. From space, a telescope is limited by its diffraction limited resolution. For the Hubble Space Telescope, that is a little less than 0.05 arcseconds or about 90 meters at the distance of the moon. To resolve the LM descent stage which is about 10 meters across, one would need to have a resolution better than 10 meters, perhaps 2-3 meters which means we need a telescope some 30 times larger than the HST in orbit around the Earth to resolve the largest equipment left on the moon.

15 posted on 09/10/2002 6:23:23 AM PDT by KarlInOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: KarlInOhio
There were transmitting devices and mirrors left on the moon. The mirros were left to reflect lasers to be used to calculate distances.

Radio telescopes?

This seems too much part of the tinfoil hat patrol.
17 posted on 09/10/2002 6:30:37 AM PDT by Greeklawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
Violence never solves anything. He shoulda "Mooned" the guy instead.

--Boris

18 posted on 09/10/2002 6:36:05 AM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free State Four
ROFLOL!!
19 posted on 09/10/2002 6:36:10 AM PDT by Jonah Hex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TopQuark; dighton; Orual; general_re
If this person thinks that the Moon Shot was a hoax, then no wonder some bigots claim Holocaust has never happened. I wonder if he needs proof that his great grandparents ever existed: he never met them personally, after all.

Sorta like the people who want "proof" of evolution ... or "evidence" that Saddam is building WMD's.

20 posted on 09/10/2002 7:07:13 AM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson