Skip to comments.
Ex-Inspectors: Iraq Likely Has WMD
Fox News ^
| 9/8/02
| AP
Posted on 09/08/2002 8:28:46 PM PDT by finnman69
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:34:39 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; uninspections; wmd
Obviously a few inspectors think Ritter is full of crap.
1
posted on
09/08/2002 8:28:46 PM PDT
by
finnman69
To: finnman69
Obviously a few inspectors think Ritter is full of crap.Inspectors aren't the only ones.
To: finnman69
Thank you Fox News for interviewing the other inspectors. Seems the rest of the media is only covering Scott Ritter. Parley
To: finnman69
The whole idea of weapons inspection is absolutely ludicrous
Im picturing some U.N. flunkie with a bad combover walking around a ammo dump saying "these bombs are U.N. approved you can keep these, but those bombs arent U.n. approved youll have to give them to me" Saddams flunkies are scampering around covering up the VX canisters with U.N. flunkie proof tarps on the other side of the ammo dump meanwhile!
4
posted on
09/08/2002 8:44:23 PM PDT
by
claptrap
To: finnman69
Scott Ritter is the Jane Fonda of 2002.
He will regret his actions
To: finnman69
Does anyone think these clowns have any more brains than the bozos at the airports scanning bare feet? Sheesh. I'm convinced that if there are more than 20 per cent of the World's population with any common sense, it would be a miracle.
To: BulletBrasDotNet
To: finnman69
This is all so bizarre. Hussein has WMD...six months away from a nuclear arsenal...he is nine years away...he has been assembling parts from other terror supporters from around the globe...he is three months away...
How much better off would the world have been if the British government listened to Churchill (who was years ahead of the curve) and taken out Hitler before he became a threat?
How much of a moron do you have to be to wait until an avowed terrorist gets all the WMD he wants PLUS a nice delivery system before you take him out?
I believe this will be another case where we dodged a bullet a couple of years ago. The decision now rests with only one person, and I bet he isn't swayed as much by nonsense as he is by a sense of right and wrong and his own duty.
8
posted on
09/08/2002 9:56:05 PM PDT
by
stevem
To: finnman69
Why is this news? We know for a fact that Saddam used chemical weapons in combat with Iran and to wipe out some troublesome Kurds. Of course he has weapons of mass destruction. Next?
9
posted on
09/08/2002 10:11:01 PM PDT
by
mvpel
To: finnman69
NO! ScottClintonlackey Ritter says they don't, so that makes it true! He is the new Jane Fonda of the left, only they love him! No cries of traitor about him consorting with the enemy! It also doesn't matter at all that his story seems to have changed over the years.
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: spongebob58
Ritter is an Iraqi sympathizer and has conflicts of interest that are overwhelming......he's also a traitor to the U.S.
spongebob58, you need to be wrung out, dry.......right now, you're all wet.
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson