Skip to comments.
Mystery of the Ages (Now Ann Coulter has liberals in an uproar over her age) lolrof
WP ^
| 9/6/2002
| Lloyd Grove
Posted on 09/07/2002 9:06:11 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
Is Human Uzi Ann Coulter 38 or 40 years old? And when she insists that she's the former, is she telling a fib? The right-wing media scourge who has been getting plenty of ink for her best-selling book, "Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right" frequently scorches hapless reporters who dare write that she's no longer in her thirties. Newsday's Aileen Jacobson who was planning to rely on numerous published accounts, including People magazine's, that Coulter is 40 let her subject argue her into using the younger age in a recent profile. "Media accounts that she's 40 are wrong, she maintains," Jacobson wrote. But yesterday Jacobson told us: "I do believe that she is 40." London Telegraph writer Toby Harnden, meanwhile, wrote in his July 19 piece: "An air of mystery surrounds Coulter's age. She says she is 38 but her publicist puts her at 40. After the interview, she sends me an e-mail: 'I think you should go with one of the incorrect younger ages.' " Our own investigation revealed that: * Coulter's Connecticut driver's license lists her birth as December 1961. * Her D.C. driver's license, acquired many years later, says she was born in December 1963. * The birth date on file at the New Canaan, Conn., voter registration office is Dec. 8, 1961. In an effort to clear up all this confusion, a member of The Post's crack research team phoned the New Canaan registrar of voters, who chuckled, checked his records and reported that Coulter registered to vote in 1980, when presumably she was the legal minimum voting age of 18. That would make her 40 today. But when we reached Coulter, she predictably stuck to her guns. "It's like the difference in being thrown off the 13th floor or the roof," she e-mailed us. "So the upside is, I'm two years younger than at least some newspapers have said I am, but the downside is, I'm still 38. Yikes!"
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; commies; liberal; slander; stupid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 last
To: ChadGore
If I had to guess by her looks, I'd say 28.
To: TLBSHOW
It seems the liberals are practicing ageism if they even think it's an issue. Ann looks better than any democrat woman of any age and that's what's bothering them. Hillary never looked good, she was uglier in her college days than she was in her 40's after the doctors helped her out.
62
posted on
09/08/2002 8:16:24 AM PDT
by
FITZ
To: TLBSHOW
To Ann Coulter;
No, Ann the upside is that your book is so tight that they can't attack the book but wanting attack something after your smarting wit, they attack YOUR AGE by 2 years.... 2 years is important at 15 but not at over 35....
63
posted on
09/08/2002 8:28:14 AM PDT
by
hosepipe
To: TLBSHOW
she was born in December 1963. O what a night (doo dootdoo do, doo dootdoo), late december back in six-ty three!
I wondered why they wrote that song!
64
posted on
09/08/2002 8:35:33 AM PDT
by
HIDEK6
To: TLBSHOW
This is hilarious.
The progressive marroons must be hissy-fit to be tied if they are attacking her
age now.
What a bunch of kindergarten mentality retards.
And we actually waste time reporting it?
Can't make up stuff this good...
To: Dakmar
>>>
We must re-pot her in a stretch of Pacific-Northwwest rainforest immediately. <<< You ain't re-poting Helen in my stretch of the Pacific Northwest without a fight. We already have enough spotted owls.
To: thedilg
I think the price to kill a murderer is over $10,000,000.00.
The price to house them for life is about $3,000,000.00.
I think few if any real bad guys who get life are released. They would as you say, only kill again.
67
posted on
09/08/2002 6:02:37 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
To: Dakmar
Until conservatives go for what they do in parts (like Democrats), they will have more losses than wins! IMO
68
posted on
09/08/2002 6:04:39 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
To: TLBSHOW
Obviously Ann has struck a nerve in the world of liberals! She is being attacked on all fronts by the elite media who are angry that someone would dare tell the truth about them and their politicians of choice. She must be jumping for joy!
To: SevenofNine
Hey Sevenofnine!
RACKITTTT!!!!!! :)
To: Publius6961
this was what Rush meant when he said it will be fun to watch the liberals........lol
71
posted on
09/08/2002 6:14:49 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
To: Publius6961
The progressive marroons must be hissy-fit to be tied if they are attacking her age now. They're acting awfully catty for men, of course democrat men are mostly gays or latent gays. They're jealous of how she looks.
72
posted on
09/08/2002 6:20:17 PM PDT
by
FITZ
To: TLBSHOW
Where did you go to college?
73
posted on
09/08/2002 10:08:17 PM PDT
by
Conagher
To: vetvetdoug
"Ann Coulter is 38 or 40 years old?"
To quote B.C:
"Well, it all depends on what the meaning of 'IS' is."
I am just happy that Ann Coulter 'IS'!
74
posted on
09/09/2002 10:57:06 AM PDT
by
ronjon
To: FITZ
She's more Real Man (honest adult) than many of them will ever be...and they'll NEVER be as feminine...
...which bugs them to tears. She'd giving them the casual dope-slap they deserve, and wear so well.
To: TLBSHOW
Wait a minute everyone!Shouldn't the liberals be championing her for mistating her age?
After all, one of the pillars of liberalism isn't what the facts are, but it is what you feel.
So, since she might not "feel" 40, but 38, it flies in the face of logic to say she "is" (thank you Bill) 38.
76
posted on
09/09/2002 11:01:19 AM PDT
by
NorCoGOP
To: Looking for Diogenes
My grandmother has always said that a lady's age is no one's else's business. No one will ever convict a leftist of having manners.
To: TLBSHOW
Lloyd Grove writes a gossip column, and Ann Coulter appearing to lie about her age is certainly gossip. Frankly, I think it's silly for Ann to lie and say she's 38 -- she looks great for 40, and there's no reason to lie about a measly two years in age.
To: NYCVirago
I don't think Ann is lying about her age being 38. I think she graduated from Mich law school in 1988, & assuming she went straight from undergrad in spring of '85 to Mich in fall of '85, she'd have been 25 when she finished law school in '88. That makes her 38 now - until her birth date in December. And that math is based upon the "usual" age one starts and finishes undergrad -- 18 & 22, respectively. If she took a shorter route through Cornell (ie, finished in less than 4 yrs), then she's even younger.
But like my grandmother always said, "A lady never has to tell her age."
79
posted on
09/12/2002 8:23:45 PM PDT
by
Endeavor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson