Mystery of the Ages (Now Ann Coulter has liberals in an uproar over her age) lolrof

WP ^ | 9/6/2002 | Lloyd Grove

[TLBSHOW]

Is Human Uzi Ann Coulter 38 or 40 years old? And when she insists that she's the former, is she telling a fib? The right-wing media scourge – who has been getting plenty of ink for her best-selling book, "Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right" – frequently scorches hapless reporters who dare write that she's no longer in her thirties. Newsday's Aileen Jacobson – who was planning to rely on numerous published accounts, including People magazine's, that Coulter is 40 – let her subject argue her into using the younger age in a recent profile. "Media accounts that she's 40 are wrong, she maintains," Jacobson wrote. But yesterday Jacobson told us: "I do believe that she is 40." London Telegraph writer Toby Harnden, meanwhile, wrote in his July 19 piece: "An air of mystery surrounds Coulter's age. She says she is 38 but her publicist puts her at 40. After the interview, she sends me an e-mail: 'I think you should go with one of the incorrect younger ages.' " Our own investigation revealed that: * Coulter's Connecticut driver's license lists her birth as December 1961. * Her D.C. driver's license, acquired many years later, says she was born in December 1963. * The birth date on file at the New Canaan, Conn., voter registration office is Dec. 8, 1961. In an effort to clear up all this confusion, a member of The Post's crack research team phoned the New Canaan registrar of voters, who chuckled, checked his records and reported that Coulter registered to vote in 1980, when presumably she was the legal minimum voting age of 18. That would make her 40 today. But when we reached Coulter, she predictably stuck to her guns. "It's like the difference in being thrown off the 13th floor or the roof," she e-mailed us. "So the upside is, I'm two years younger than at least some newspapers have said I am, but the downside is, I'm still 38. Yikes!"

[PoorMuttly]

It's only a number...depending on who you are.

To Libs...it's a condemnation. Little, miserable fools, trying to coerce others into their disease.

[Chad Fairbanks]

Who cares how old she is? She's an excellent writer...

[RightWhale]

Some people look better and sound smarter when they are 40 than when they were 38.

[Dakmar]

It's so easy to tell, Hillary, Feinschwein, and Renos ages by looking at their teeth that no Republican counter-offensive is necessary, but I encourage one anyway.

[TLBSHOW]

LIBERALS:

Little, miserable fools, trying to coerce others into their disease.


BUMP

[tet68]

Hillery! has been 38 since 1969.
Still looks good for someone her age.
As they say dearie, you have a beauty that's timeless,
er, eternal, ah, legs like tree rings, mmmmm I give up.

[RepoGirl]

Wow... if this is the most pressing criticism of Annie the libs can come up with... boy these freaks are just reaching for it now!

No truer words spoken than when El Rushbo stated, "The libs get weird (and entertaining) when they're out of power..."

[Excuse_My_Bellicosity]

38 or 40?!?! OH MY GOSH, I'M FREAKING OUT!!!! < /sarcasm >

[Dakmar]

That would make Helen Thomas subject to the "old growth" regulations. We must re-pot her in a stretch of Pacific-Northwwest rainforest immediately.

[BossLady]

LMAO! I know....I know....when will the agony end????

[tet68]

I thought I saw a spotted owl in her hair last time.
Or maybe that was just the bugs moving.

[Dakmar]

You don't get that close to Hillary and not come away with a few parasites.

[A CA Guy]

She seems to be holding together very well and in fine fashion!

If she's thirty eight, that makes her a "38 special"! LOL

[Paleo Conservative]

[kellynla]

like Groucho Marx use to say "you're only as old as the woman you feel"...

[Looking for Diogenes]

My grandmother has always said that a lady's age is no one's else's business.

[PoorMuttly]

Oh, she's a very special 38.

She's got 'em all worked up...and she couldn't care less.

They hate when that happens.

[Dakmar]

I thought the Leftists were the ones always bitching about how women are "objectified". Now they want to make an issue about Ann's true age. What a completely empty arsenal they have to choose from. Anyone who isn't an idiot - nevermind, that would be the entire spectrum of Democrat voters.

[A CA Guy]

The Democrats only objective is to tax and create a dependant vote through make-work gov. jobs and handouts.
After that, all they have is fear to cause a negative vote.

Look at Hillary now, they aren't talking about anything she has done in the Senate. Instead the hair is in the news over her efforts! LOL You have to love it! Her hair is what stands out about her job in the Senate.