Ann Coulter Gets Fired...........Again

CentreDaily.com ^ | 3 September 2002

[BossLady]

Go Doughty!!!!!!!!!!!! I do not think this will put a teeny tiny dent in Ann's popularity....

Some info on this kitty litter paper.....

Circulation: 25,682 daily and 32,633 Sunday

Size: Averages 40 pages daily and 66 pages Sunday

State College has a small but thriving downtown.

Employees: 190

Total News Staff: 42

Major Competitors: Penn State University-affiliated Daily Collegian; eight local radio stations; two area magazines. All four major TV networks have stations in the region.

Major Advertisers: Giant Food Stores; Penn State University; Mike's Movies and Music; RE/MAX Realtors; Rider Auto Inc.

Watch out NY Times they are catching up!!!! /sarcasm

[Dakmar]

Stupid hippies!

[republicman]

It is a war out there and the sooner more Pubbies learn that, the better.

Amen

[amused]

It's not about "lemmings", its about trashing your won. And I can think of a lot of people who deserve it far more than she.

2 posters who you did not even respond to trashed her. A few fawningly asked for pictures, a few even discussed the article at hand. But a few people said they didn't care for her and you leaped on them. Some here find her a bit light intellectually, some think she trades on her looks, some love her even if she started dating a pornographer ;-)

But what happens to Bush on a daily basis is more trashing your own than some people not getting excited about a liberal editor firing Ann from a second rate paper.

It's because of people like her getting trashed that practically all the republican party consists of is a bunch of cowards who go along with the dems every chance they get.

The problems of the GOP are hardly because they are cowed. They want to vote this way or do not see it as a bad thing. That is the problem.

[Mr. Mojo]

Well, you [Coulter] are either a hater or a hypocrite who calls names and spews enmity because you believe it will get your pretty face on television

Pretty face? If you like lipless skeletons, I suppose so.

Nice legs though.

[<1/1,000,000th%]

Your Friday column, in which you declared that liberals are "no good," then trashed the entire Kennedy clan as a collection of "heroin addicts, convicted killers, cheaters, bottleggers and dissolute drunks," crossed that line.

Sounds right. What's the problem?

[Mr. K]

That's twice today I heard our Beloved Ann called a 'hater'. It must be the new democrap word of the day.

I have NEVER heard one ounce of 'hate' in Ann's writing- just blistering satire and wit!

I LOVE YOU ANN!!!!!

[republicman]

But a few people said they didn't care for her and you leaped on them.

Yeah, so?

But what happens to Bush on a daily basis is more trashing your own than some people not getting excited about a liberal editor firing Ann from a second rate paper.

The only trashing bush gets here is when he is not behaving like a conservative. The rest of it--the he's dumb (which is pretty much what you said Coulter is) and all that other nonsense people here don't go for. Because most of us have the good sense to know its liberal bilge we'd be endorsing.

So sorry that you can't see that's what you're doing with your Ann Coulter smearing. The problems of the GOP are hardly because they are cowed.

Boy you haven't been paying attention at all, have you. With few exceptions verything they do is a reflection of their fear of another Clinton impeachment style backlash. Why is Bush always trying to "move on" every time Clinton comes up? Why is Newt not the speaker anymore, instead of the non controversial Denny Hastert?

Come on man. Wake up.

[ladyinred]

Dear Ann,
We only allow that hateful Molly Mcguire to write columns where she spouts every rude insult at the President of the United States she has ever learned. We do not allow the 1st amendment to apply to conservatives.

[ladyinred]

Pardon me, got my Molly's mixed up, one is a movie, one is a witch. Molly Ivins, of course is who I was referring to. Opps!

[Utopia]

I'm with you about taking Ann in small doses simply for the fact that it grates on me to read insult after insult of the left. She isn't telling me much I don't already know when she does this. It's just not the way I chose to communicate my dislike of the leftist viewpoint.

I find her technique rather boring. Insult after insult is not the way to carry on an intelligent discussion. So many on the left (and in this forum do it) it seems, but it doesn't make it right. My idea of a discussion is NOT to imply: "if you don't agree with me, you're an idiot." I guess I'm not that arrogant. Michael Barone is much more interesting read.

Interesting that I could write: I can only take her small doese and some could take it so personally.

[republicman]

But of the more than 500 e-mails that poured in, about 485 supported the paper's decision...

Funny since I, and conservative friends of mine, sent in way more than fifteen on our own.

...according to Executive Editor Bob Unger.

Hmm, well I guess that explains it.

Another reason why, as Ann might put it, liberals don't deserve our respect, they lie.

[Afronaut]

I agree. Can't stand her.

[republicman]

Michael Barone is much more interesting read.

Actually, I tend to find Barone all right too. But even if I didn't I sure as heck wouldn't join in the egg throwing contest if he got fired for taking on the libs.

It ain't about personal, darlin' its about doing the other sides dirty work for them.

To sit there and trash a fellow soldier (and on top of that using the enemy's language to do it) is quisling-esque.

[oldironsides]

Ann takes no prisoners. She takes them on to their face.
She is facing down a group that campaigns in churches, divides races and religions and accepts campaign money from
ChiComs. The elitists of the left gasp and act surprised when someone like Ann emerges to take them on? It is about time. Many were tired of waiting for a Republican male to do it. Trent Lott and his cheerleader type can take a back seat.

[Hot Tabasco]

I will read Krauthammer, Cal Thomas, George Will, thank you very much. Whenever Ann is on tv, I flip the station.

Well good, keep flippin. Who out of all four gets the most TV exposure?

[Dakmar]

She is flippant, rude,

That's good enough for me. I dig flippant, rude chicks.

[orfisher]

While many here including myself love to see the liberals get bashed I can't help but beleive that Coulter is a shrew that never gets a second date.

[dogbyte12]

Ok Everybody, I relent. Ann Coulter is a goddess. She is also more profound than Socrates, Plato, Adam Smith and John Locke combined. I shall worship the very newsprint that her column lives in by laminating each column and dedicating a shrine to it, and to all that Ann "Perfection" Coulter stands for in this world that was adrift until she showed us the way.

[republicman]

That's good enough for me. I dig flippant, rude chicks.

Me too. Especially when they're rude to the right (er I mean left) people.