Replies

I'm with you about taking Ann in small doses simply for the fact that it grates on me to read insult after insult of the left. She isn't telling me much I don't already know when she does this. It's just not the way I chose to communicate my dislike of the leftist viewpoint.

I find her technique rather boring. Insult after insult is not the way to carry on an intelligent discussion. So many on the left (and in this forum do it) it seems, but it doesn't make it right. My idea of a discussion is NOT to imply: "if you don't agree with me, you're an idiot." I guess I'm not that arrogant. Michael Barone is much more interesting read.

Interesting that I could write: I can only take her small doese and some could take it so personally.

Michael Barone is much more interesting read.

Actually, I tend to find Barone all right too. But even if I didn't I sure as heck wouldn't join in the egg throwing contest if he got fired for taking on the libs.

It ain't about personal, darlin' its about doing the other sides dirty work for them.

To sit there and trash a fellow soldier (and on top of that using the enemy's language to do it) is quisling-esque.