Posted on 09/02/2002 6:19:36 AM PDT by madfly
Hatred of the U.S. is palpable among the various state and NGO delegations. While such hatred is prevalent in all U.N. meetings, it seems to be especially acrimonious at the World Summit in Johannesburg, South Africa.
Most of the acrimony centers on perceived trade barriers, subsidies (especially farm subsidies) and the rejection of the Kyoto Protocol by the U.S. As the heads of state and government gather in Johannesburg, the summit was deadlocked late Friday, over 14 issues in a 70-page "Plan of Implementation," pitting the developed nations against the developing nations, and the United States against the European Union (EU).
Meeting the development and environment goals set down by the U.N.'s Millennium Summit -- the backbone of the summit's Plan of Implementation -- will cost up to 85 billion dollars per year, more than 40 percent more than originally estimated, a World Bank official said. Indonesian chief negotiator, Emil Salim, said that the 14 contested points had become "political issues.... If this summit fails, then the United Nations fails."
Similarly, British Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott warned: "If we fail here, things would unravel on a scale that we have not seen before in international negotiations.... That would be tragic for the whole world, and most of all for those who are in poverty and despair."
The U.S. continues to be the target of blame for all the ills of the world. While the deep suspicion of the developed nations by the undeveloped nations continues, the strongest words were uttered by environmental Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). Friends of the Earth called the U.S., Canada and Australia the "axis of evil." Daniel Mittler, spokesman for Friends of the Earth said that, "Instead of using the Earth summit to respond to global concerns over deregulation and liberalization, governments are pushing the World Trade Organization's agenda and re-branding it as 'sustainable development.'"
Environmentalists are incensed that many of the developed nations, led by the U.S., are promoting free markets and free trade. They are placing banners with the slogan "Don't Let Big Businesses Rule the World" at the summit. To environmentalists, wealth is somehow "the root of evil behind environmental problems, when in reality, all evidence is to the contrary," claimed Chris Horner of the think tank Competitive Enterprise Institute, in Washington, D.C. Horner notes that the only solution to environmental woes is a wealthier planet. "Wealthier is healthier, and cleaner."
The U.S. is firing back at the environmentalists. U.S. AID Administrator, Andrew Natsios, accused environmental groups yesterday of endangering the lives of millions of famine-threatened Africans by encouraging their governments to reject geneticly modified U.S. food aid. "They can play these games with Europeans, who have full stomachs, but it is revolting and despicable to see them do so when the lives of Africans are at stake," Mr. Natsios said in an interview.
"They are using big-time, very well-organized propaganda the likes of which I have never seen before" in 12 years of American-led famine-relief efforts, said Mr. Natsios, who could not persuade the Zambians to accept U.S. food aid. "The Bush administration is not going to sit there and let these groups kill millions of poor people in southern Africa through their ideological campaign," Mr. Natsios said on the sidelines of the World Summit on Sustainable Development.
In spite of the strong possibility of massive famine in Zambia, environmentalists have been intensively lobbying Zambia, Mozambique and other regional states not to take genetically modified U.S. corn. Major research studies in the past several years have shown the corn is safe, but the environmental groups say it could cause dangerous mutations if it grows alongside the local varieties.
Without any research to back them up, environmentalists have also told Zambian and other African leaders that it could endanger the health of those who eat it. Zimbabwe has refused modified U.S. corn on the grounds that farmers might plant some of the seeds, which might cross-fertilize with the country's native corn. In turn, this would jeopardize the country's future food exports to Europe, which only allows a handful of geneticly modified crops.
According to the World Health Organization, an estimated 13 million people face starvation in southern Africa, with up to 300,000 dying in the next six months. This does not seem to concern environmentalists, however.
Prior to the start of the World Summit, one environmentalist claimed, "There is a lot of quality to be had in poverty." He also claimed that electricity is "destroying the cultures of the world's poor." Most people, especially Americans, do not realize that rank-and-file members of environmental groups do not understand the anti-human, anti-civilization goals of environmental leadership.
Gar Smith, editor of The Edge, the newsletter of Earth Island Institute, which publishes much of the environmental literature, said: "The idea that people are poor doesn't mean that they are not living good lives. I don't think a lot of electricity is a good thing. It is the fuel that powers a lot of multi-national imagery," Smith said.
According to Smith, electricity can wreak havoc on cultures. "I have seen villages in Africa that had vibrant cultures and great communities that were disrupted and destroyed by the introduction of electricity," he said.
Environmentalists destroy the environment as well as people. Dr. Kelvin Kemm, a nuclear physicist in South Africa who is affiliated with the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT) in Washington D.C., said that Greenpeace gave the Government of Botswana $600 million to no longer kill elephants. The ban on hunting allowed the elephant herd to become over populated, which caused the trampling and destruction of the elephant's habitat and the starvation of thousand's of elephants.
This elitist, god-playing mentality is common among environmentalists. Bjorn Lomborg, former Greenpeace member and activist, says that they are wrong, sometimes with deadly consequences. He conducted a multi-year study and concluded that the dire ecological health of the earth that is being espoused by many delegates to the Earth summit is "not supported by the evidence."
Lomborg writes that "resources have become more abundant, not less so." The earth's ecological problems are "best cured, not by restricting economic growth but by accelerating it.... Only when people are rich enough to feed themselves do they begin to think about the effect of their actions on the world around them, and on future generations."
"Mr. Bush, it would seem, had best learn when to nip outrageous, mendacious rhetoric in the bud before he nurtures it by his silence," Horner said. "Barring such leadership ... the U.S. faces a grim future in this community, and among easily-led peoples everywhere."
Read more about the dangers of U.N. sustainable development and how the earth's citizens and environment are better served through individual freedom, free market enterprise, and property rights in Freedom 21, an Alternative to Agenda 21.
Dr. Coffman is CEO of Sovereignty International, and publisher of Discerning the Times, and is a part of a delegation sponsored by the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow.
Also. . . Read more about the dangers of U.N. sustainable development and how the earth's citizens and environment are better served through individual freedom, free market enterprise, and property rights in Natural Process: That Environmental Laws May Serve the Laws of Nature, by Mark Vande Pol (Carry_Okie)
Natural Process:
That Environmental Laws
May Serve the Laws of NatureThis book is an honest answer
to a divisive struggle:Private Property Rights versus
Environmental Protection.The answer is... BOTH.
Leaders from both sides find its proposals innovative and workable.
Isn't it time we tried something new
Natural Process introduces a free-market environmental management system that gradually eliminates the need for permits, regulations, and agency enforcement. Its design starts with proven product-design and manufacturing process-control techniques used to assure consumer product quality and safety. These components are incorporated into a system of checks and balances that uses third party certification and pooled risk to price the use of natural assets objectively and demands inviolable protection of private property rights. This synthesis can improve our care of the environment in harmony with an advanced economy.
This 455 page, five-part work rigorously demonstrates how regulatory government operates under false premises, rendering its managing agencies dependent upon continuing problems, incapable of balancing competing risks, and subject to political corruption. The book makes its case with detailed analyses of original source data that reveal a new way to do better for both nature and humanity. It proposes specific examples and suggests an implementing strategy. It is a thought-provoking work that handles an emotional subject with a delightful sense of humor.
Mark Edward Vande Pol brings a diverse background to the field of environmental management. His experience includes hands-on research in habitat restoration, machine design, manufacturing electronics and medical devices, software development, pest control, formulation and compatibility testing, design of experiments, industrial and residential construction, regulatory compliance and quality system design, vendor qualification, and documentation control. His university education is founded in control system mathematics, economics, and Constitutional philosophy. He combines that experience with the drive and commitment, characteristic of product creators, and the respect for working people derived from having done the hard work with his own hands.
Mr. Vande Pol was a leading contributor to the Santa Cruz County Local Agenda 21 Biodiversity and Ecosystem Management Roundtable. His purpose was to see rigorous science respected in policy. The final document, presented as "consensus," was rewritten in secret by non-participants, unwittingly serving the interests of a select group of developers, bureaucrats, and politicians. The plan was not only outrageously expensive, it was assured to be hugely destructive to local habitat. It was a fraud.
That did it. Mr. Vande Pol halted his career and spent three years without pay, researching the causes of environmental mismanagement and developing this free-market alternative. Reading it carefully will forever change the way you see the role of private property, free enterprise, and individual liberty in improving environmental health. You can read excerpts or buy this book using the links on the side bar.
Enjoy!
……..Before embarking on their adventure, the kids--who were joined by two young people from Washington, D.C., and accompanied by adult mentors--studied the sociopolitical history of South Africa, including apartheid. All were Latino or African American or a mix of the two, and were encouraged to think about their own identity, their own experiences with racism.
…..At the conference exhibit hall, the L.A. kids mounted a photo exhibition showing the underbelly of America. There were bleak images of life on an Indian reservation, of the homeless in Los Angeles. It was an eye-opener to some South Africans, who thought everyone in America was rich. "They were absolutely shocked," said Lynn Warshafsky, executive director of Venice Arts Mecca.
In turn, the L.A. group was surprised at the degree of anti-American sentiment, something they had to process. "They had to ask themselves questions they'd never asked before" about how others see them, Warshafsky said.
……..For Eamon, the highlight was hearing Fidel Castro speak. "I had thought of him as seriously evil. I realized he's not evil, he's doing what he thinks is best. He has this sort of demeanor about him. Whether you like him or not, you respect him. It opened my eyes." [End Excerpts]
I'm looking for a downside here. I don't see one.
And... here's the proof:
We don't what THAT, do we????
That's absolutely right!!!! Yes Sir!!!!
Not to mention 'floridation' messing up with our precious bodily fluids.
Let's just stop the PC Nicety.
It's really the civilized nations versus the UNDEVELOPED nations. Let's stop calling them "Developing".
If WE develop them, they hate us even more.
Reminds me of an ugly kid in school who was very generous, in trying to buy friends. Before, he was hated.
After, he was hated and despised.
Just like us.
Exactly!!!
All you need to prove this right is to take a look at New Jersey. Just try to imagine the joys of morning commute with 3 or 4 times as many cars trying to move on the highway.
The horror of free markets and free trade. Lets compare the environmental records for two industrialized nations. One with realitively free markets and trade like the USA and one without free markets and trade like the old USSR.
Can these people be that stupid to believe free markets create environmental problems. This only points to the obvious that it's not about the environment.
Huh? Let's say I spend $1 billion to develop this GM corn. I make my money by selling this corn for consumption, not for seed. Selling it as seed is a one-shot deal, and I'll never get my money back.
Trust me, the growers of GM corn are carefully monitored and controlled (my spouse worked for DeKalb Genetics).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.