Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did U.S. shoot first at Pearl Harbor?
Associated Press ^ | 29 August 2002

Posted on 08/29/2002 11:13:48 AM PDT by Asmodeus

HONOLULU, Aug. 28 — Researchers said Wednesday they found a Japanese midget submarine sunk more than an hour before the attack on Pearl Harbor. Discovery of the 78-foot vessel could provide the first physical evidence to back U.S. military assertions that it fired first against Japan in World War II and inflicted the first casualties.>p>

THE SUB was sunk by a Navy destroyer on Dec. 7, 1941. Two Japanese crewmen are believed still inside the submarine.

“It’s the shot that started World War II between the Americans and the Japanese,” said John Wiltshire, associate director of the Hawaii Undersea Research Laboratory, which found the sub. The two-man submarine was discovered unexpectedly at a depth of 1,200 feet and a few miles from Pearl Harbor by research craft making test dives, he said.

The sub led four other Japanese midget submarines to Pearl Harbor to take part in the attack. The newly discovered sub was believed to be the one sunk by the destroyer USS Ward before the attack began. Wiltshire said the crew is certain that this sub was sunk by the Ward because of a bullet hole in the conning tower and because it still has both torpedoes. Three of the subs have been previously accounted for; the remaining sub had fired both of its weapons.

Until the submarine was found, historian Daniel Martinez said eyewitness accounts were unconfirmed. Martinez, a historian for the USS Arizona Memorial, has interviewed the crew who fired the first shot, and a pilot who saw the submarine sink. “What they saw and what they felt was their recollection, now the proof has been found,” he said.

The submarines’ entry into the harbor was followed by the Sunday morning attack by Japanese planes that lasted two hours and left 21 U.S. ships heavily damaged, 323 aircraft damaged or destroyed, 2,390 people dead and 1,178 other wounded.

Terry Kerby, chief pilot of the deep-diving submersible that found the submarine, said it was covered in growth but was in excellent condition. “To actually come across it was a sobering moment, realizing that was the shot that started the Pacific war,” he said.

This is one of the two University of Hawaii deep diving submersibles that discovered a sunken Japanese midget submarine a few miles from Pearl Harbor.

Kerby and other researchers have been conducting dives in the area since the 1980s, and have always known the sub was somewhere out there. Wiltshire described the area as an underwater military junkyard. ‘To actually come across it was a sobering moment, realizing that was the shot that started the Pacific war.’ “The thing is quite difficult to find because of all the massive amounts of junk out in the area, and we were simply fortunate because we’ve run our test and training dives through here and know where a lot of the junk is,” Wiltshire said.

The submarine was the focus of a National Geographic expedition in 2000. A team of deep-water researchers led by undersea explorer Robert Ballard spent 10 days searching for the Japanese sub, using remotely operated imaging vehicles. Ballard is best known for finding the remains of the Titanic, Bismarck and Yorktown, along with the recent discovery of PT-109, the torpedo boat commanded by John F. Kennedy during World War II and sunk near the Solomon Islands.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Japan; News/Current Events; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: danielmartinez; hawaii; japan; japanese; johnwiltshire; pearlharbor; robertballard; usnavy; ussward; worldwar2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last
To: Asmodeus
My wife's grandfather was on Admiral Kimmel's staff and said the Navy knew the Japs were deploying these subs near Pearl and were looking for them a month prior to Dec. 7.
41 posted on 08/29/2002 11:43:31 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush
The same peace-loving Japan that invaded Manchuria because of some arrogant, egotistical, genocidal emperor with dreams of conquering the south pacific because he believed he was better than the world.... You mean that peace-loving Japan??? [/sarcasm]

--erik

42 posted on 08/29/2002 11:45:12 AM PDT by erikm88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
Researchers said Wednesday they found a Japanese midget submarine sunk ...

How insensitive! Shouldn't that be "dimensionally challenged"? You're welcome...

43 posted on 08/29/2002 11:45:50 AM PDT by bruin66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
Someone's got too mucy time on their hands. My garage needs cleaning, need a job??
44 posted on 08/29/2002 11:47:43 AM PDT by joyful1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
What's this? A prelude to revisionist claims that Japan then attacked Pearl Harbor in retaliation?

LOL! Yes, of course Willie. Americans are bad according to the ACLU and the leftist professors who run the universities. I think reparations for Japan are in order...

45 posted on 08/29/2002 11:48:07 AM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
Did U.S. shoot first at Pearl Harbor?

Not according to this post. I'll paste some of it here.

At 6 am USS Enterprise launched Scouting Six

Also at 6 am the Japanese lanch there aircraft for the attach on Pearl Harbor

At some point one of Scouting Six came in contact with the Japanese before the attack

Pilot Ensign Manuel Gonzales, of Scouting Six, was heard on the radio to say

"Please don't shoot! Don't shoot! This is an American plane."

Moments later, he was heard ordering his Gunner aircrewman Leonard J. Kozelek to bail out: neither man was ever heard from again.

46 posted on 08/29/2002 11:48:11 AM PDT by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Sometimes people on FR are just a BIT too quick to see liberal bias. IMHO.
47 posted on 08/29/2002 11:48:58 AM PDT by kms61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
I just got back........I'll do it today, Mr. Green, honest! :-)
48 posted on 08/29/2002 11:49:22 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: al_c; tophat9000
tophat9000, I need a source for this, please. Japanese aircraft should have been well to the north of the Enterprise search area on 12/7/41.
49 posted on 08/29/2002 11:50:34 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
Yep...and the fleet waiting over the horizon was just taking a joy ride happend to be in the area when the brutal attack occured and rushed in to save their compatriots
50 posted on 08/29/2002 11:51:40 AM PDT by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
You got that right. Admiral Yamamoto led a Japanese fleet all the way across the Pacific under great secrecy precisely to attack Pearl Harbor. The fact that the Americans spotted and fired on one of four Japanese midget submarines (advancing toward the port on the surface at the time) before the planes attacked, is therefore the "shot that started it all"?

Puleeeze.

I just finished an excellent book, Paul Revere's Ride, 1994, by David Hackett Fischer. Using all available sources, including depositions -- of both American and British soldiers in the battle -- taken days after the atttacks on Lexington and Concord, he concludes that it is impossible to say who (on which side) actually fired the first shot. It seems that the first shot was fired by someone other than those in the ranks of British Regulars or the Minutemen, who were facing each other about 50 yards apart on Lexington Green as dawn broke on 19 April, 1775.

It is only clear that the first volley was fired by the Regulars at the Minutemen, without any orders to fire from the British commander of that unit. Applying that analogy to the attack on Pearl Harbor, whoever fired the "first shot" is irrelevant. It was the first volley that committed both nations to war. And the first "volley" at Pearl Harbor was the first wave of Yamamoto's Zeros which attacked the American warships.

Congressman Billybob

Click for latest column: "Memo to CBS about Bill Clinton."

Click for latest book: "to Restore Trust in America"

51 posted on 08/29/2002 11:53:12 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

To: RightWhale
"Fortunately [luck?] the American Navy carriers were out of port or it would have been a short and most unsatisfactory war." Ditto that. No carriers = no Miracle at Midway.
53 posted on 08/29/2002 11:57:07 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Well and truly said.
54 posted on 08/29/2002 11:57:19 AM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: da_toolman
Historical PING.
55 posted on 08/29/2002 12:01:42 PM PDT by phasma proeliator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: skull stomper
Expecting accuracy regarding weapons in the American media is hopeless cause.

No kidding. This includes their wording of the damage to the newly discovered wreck. The Ward's after action report is posted in this thread; it notes that the shell which was observed to strike the submarine was observed not to have exploded. A photograph of the Ward is also posted in this thread. That forward deck gun may be a 3" piece. In any case I wouldn't call a through hit from even a 3" shell a "bullet hole", but this is the AP talking, here. They're complete, unadulterated idiots.

AB

56 posted on 08/29/2002 12:03:51 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
This is as logical as my shooting an armed man on my doorstep, then having to drag him inside. If they're there, they're there, and it ain't for tea!
57 posted on 08/29/2002 12:07:41 PM PDT by hoosierskypilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
Oh, a 3" shell. I was wondering, at least a .50 caliber, but that wouldn't make much of a hole, and why would there be just one.
58 posted on 08/29/2002 12:09:37 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green; dead
but after checking the link, I can see that it is MSNBC that put this stupid spin on the story. I should have guessed.
Yep. That explains it all.

I was trying to think of a way to say what I thought about the title but would've gotten banned for my thoughts. lol
You all nailed it.

59 posted on 08/29/2002 12:11:46 PM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
I still have several 35 MM slides taken by my dad in about 1950, of a couple of these "midget" subs on a Japanese beach. There were several kinds. A three man sub carried two torpedos. Another, single man sub, Kaiten (tremendous task)was a guided underwater bomb used ineffectively near the end of the war
60 posted on 08/29/2002 12:12:40 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson