Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: skull stomper
Expecting accuracy regarding weapons in the American media is hopeless cause.

No kidding. This includes their wording of the damage to the newly discovered wreck. The Ward's after action report is posted in this thread; it notes that the shell which was observed to strike the submarine was observed not to have exploded. A photograph of the Ward is also posted in this thread. That forward deck gun may be a 3" piece. In any case I wouldn't call a through hit from even a 3" shell a "bullet hole", but this is the AP talking, here. They're complete, unadulterated idiots.

AB

56 posted on 08/29/2002 12:03:51 PM PDT by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: ArrogantBustard
Oh, a 3" shell. I was wondering, at least a .50 caliber, but that wouldn't make much of a hole, and why would there be just one.
58 posted on 08/29/2002 12:09:37 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: ArrogantBustard
I still have several 35 MM slides taken by my dad in about 1950, of a couple of these "midget" subs on a Japanese beach. There were several kinds. A three man sub carried two torpedos. Another, single man sub, Kaiten (tremendous task)was a guided underwater bomb used ineffectively near the end of the war
60 posted on 08/29/2002 12:12:40 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson