Posted on 08/26/2002 11:40:06 AM PDT by mhking
If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)
Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.
mh: many thanks...excellent articulation of the core issue!
All: anybody out there remember when, a few years back, the WSJ went into LA and actually interviewed welfare moms who actually kept having babies to increase their welfare check, leaving it to the GRANDmoms to raise the kids? Great series of articles...any links possible?
Best to y'all...
Indeed. And it's one of the main pillars upon which the Marxist Laboratory is built to contain black thought and achievement outside of what the Race Industry, Inc. allows.
In 1964, when Southern Democrats lost their fight against the Civil Rights Act, blacks progressed at a phenomenal rate.
To be sure, according to Dr. Thomas Sowell, black economic growth was well underway during and immediately after WWII, well before the Civil Rights Movement was in full effect.
It began in 1965, and took only ten years to unravel 100 years of post-slavery progress. It's the dirty little secret that created the chaotic mess now confronting America.
Amen. Accept the government temptation and it's back to the plantation for you.
In 1965, liberals began introducing hundreds of government programs creating a massive welfare state now in dire need of reform. The dirty secret is that, under the guise of government assistance, those wishing to suck from the federal cash nipple must remove the male provider from a household or find their cash cut off. As a result, black illegitimacy skyrocketed. Between 1965 and 1975, the implementation of these programs more than doubled in the black community.
The machinations of the Marxist Laboratory. It used black people as a wedge to ingratiate itself with more and more power, right under everyone's noses.
Women are sometimes ill-equipped to raise boys, and rampant crime originates from these uncontrollable boys without fathers who grow into ignorant and dangerous men.
Although it may be crude, let's just say that the mother doesn't have the proper plumbing to raise boys. She can instill discipline, but how can she teach the boy to be what she's never been: A man?
But is it by mistake or design that government programs to help financially-strapped families can be accessed only if the nucleus of the family is destroyed in the process?
DESIGN. Marxist laboratory, anyone?
Ever since Republicans first passed civil rights legislation in 1866, opponents of more rights and freedoms and equal status for blacks have lost every battle. They have, however, convinced blacks that conservatives seek to oppress us. That's another lie.
It is a gross lie, but conservatives have no one to blame but themselves.
Take the example of abortion. Did you know that 40 percent of all abortions are black babies? Have we benefited from this genocide?
The Klan couldn't have done it better.
It's lunacy that the liberals Leftists who created the mess in black America now promote themselves as the solution!
That's right, but hardly surprising. It's the Marxist laboratory over and over again.
Message to the Left: Don't let me catch you slippin' in the left turn lane.
Did you hear that, DU lurkers?
And it's truly disgusting to see the ridiculous shenanigans of race warlords like Reverend Man of God Jesse "Two Families" Jackson. "Hey, folks! Don't look at this crippling wave of bastards, or the War on (Some) Drugs, or school vouchers, or anything! Look at this, I've got a monkey! It's a Confederate flag! Look at me! Hey!" There are some real issues black Americans should care about. None of which will be found coming from the mouths of such ravenous race-hustling panderers.
Black people need to rise up en masse and denounce clownish buffoons like Jackson and Farrakhan, just like caucasians flat-out refused to be associated with Yahoo Serious. But it seems many don't consider intellectual slavery and lives of being coldly manipulated like interchangeable mechanical cogs at the heart of some devilish, world-wrecking machine as a bad deal.
While, actually, the illegitimacy rate had begun to creep up from 20% at the time of ADC (1938), and had actually exceeded 25% by 1965, the greater explosion did come after that.
But what I would applaud is the recognition that Negro Society had already adjusted and was building good foundations, long before 20th Century "Liberals," began to undermine those foundations:
Communities were built, businesses were started and colleges were constructed by freed slaves and their immediate descendants.
And note this significant difference between then and what happened in the second half of the 20th Century. We have only heard of men like Booker T. Washington and George Washington Carver, because they developed themselves, and then sought to help their own people. In that process they won the lasting respect of all Americans of good will. No one would have dared imply of either, that they owed their success to "Affirmative Action," or big Government--as Bill Clinton, smuggly and insultingly, implied was true of successful Negroes during his Presidency.
I do not know which of the following is the more destructive:
1. The outrageously patronizing attitude of the modern "Liberal," which assumes that they are indispensable to the progress of a people.
2. The bribes that the modern "Liberal" has built into the law, which subsidize corrupt conduct (such as the ADC), and which undermine the foundations of healthy families and societies.
3. The undermining of self-respect both in 1 and 2, when coupled with the implications of assigning "heroes" to a people, in place of the ones they would naturally honor. You see this, when ever there is a problem, and observe the choice of whom the "Liberal" chooses to deal with. (We have had a belly full of this, lately, in Cincinnati.) You also see this in the insulting tactic by the educational bureaucracy in falsely assigning certain historic figures to their race. The actual contempt that the "Liberal" educator displays in this is beyond cruel.
As a practicing lawyer, with a fair amount of his time spent in handling criminal cases, I have seen first hand evidence of the breakdown that the writer deplores: Where parents of good, decent, working middle-class families and small businessmen, lost some of their children to the seeds sewn by modern "Liberalism." It is a hideous and heart-rending picture, indeed.
In conclusion, I would only echo the sentiment of the writer, in his introduction:
It's about time responsible journalists addressed the issues affecting America in an aggressive and well- informed manner.
But considering the ideological bent and personal integrity of most journalists, today; I will not hold my breath or my pen, until they do so.
William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site
Is the word "bastard?" Perhaps the author used it intentionally to get the reader's attention.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.