Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Even in an Orwellian nightmare of 1 spy camera on the streets of Britain per 25 Brits - not counting traffic cameras - and few Brit dissidents having guns for long-range attack, Brits are saying "Enough" to Big Brother.

Do you know what U.S. spy cameras and stoplight cameras look like? See photos!

1 posted on 08/25/2002 2:36:06 AM PDT by glc1173@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: glc1173@aol.com
The Eye in the Sky... looking at *You* - thread II
2 posted on 08/25/2002 2:41:59 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glc1173@aol.com
I knew the Brit's had a dry sense of humour...

they must have caught the Freedom Bug from the USA!!!

Loss of freedom is no joke!!

3 posted on 08/25/2002 2:47:26 AM PDT by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glc1173@aol.com
The idea as I see it, is to shape Society to where nobody wants to shoot the President...

Not to make it a Society where no one can shoot the President!!

Besides, it ain't the Presidents fault, it's the DemonRats in the Senate!!!

P.S. I am not a threat!!

4 posted on 08/25/2002 2:53:29 AM PDT by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glc1173@aol.com
This is great! Pretty soon they'll have to install cameras to watch the cameras. Then cameras that are watching the cameras that watch cameras, etc...

Then they'll find out that it would have been cheaper to hire more police than to buy (and repair/replace) cameras.


Henry Bowman's right hand tightened around the walnut grip of the Solothurn S18-1000. The weapon had been a present from his Father, given to him on his fourteenth birthday in 1967. Cost $189.50 back in the sixties Henry thought irrelevantly. I thought that was a steal. Dad's friends thought it was astronomical. Wonder what they'd think now. --UC

5 posted on 08/25/2002 2:55:29 AM PDT by RandallFlagg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glc1173@aol.com


6 posted on 08/25/2002 3:04:11 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glc1173@aol.com
bump
8 posted on 08/25/2002 3:05:52 AM PDT by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glc1173@aol.com
But a Department of Transport spokesman said: 'Research has shown that the number of people killed or seriously injured on some dangerous stretches of road has fallen by 47 per cent after the installation of speed cameras.

That's because they all stopped or slowed down to disable the cameras.

10 posted on 08/25/2002 3:19:50 AM PDT by chainsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glc1173@aol.com
"Even in an Orwellian nightmare of 1 spy camera on the streets of Britain per 25 Brits - not counting traffic cameras - and few Brit dissidents having guns for long-range attack, Brits are saying "Enough" to Big Brother."

Don't question authority EVER!

You must realize that public safety justifies it all.

It's for the children.

12 posted on 08/25/2002 3:25:28 AM PDT by BlessingInDisguise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glc1173@aol.com
Well alright! Nice to see our Brit brothers standing up to 'the man'.

Too bad you guys can't shoot them from afar like we can. But hey, I guess you have to work with what you have.

Anti-tyranny bump.

15 posted on 08/25/2002 3:33:10 AM PDT by Looking4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glc1173@aol.com
Although thousands of cameras have been damaged, police have not received a single message from any passing driver reporting a vandalism. As a result, no one so far has been caught damaging a camera.

The sad part is that those with the power will never understand why. In their minds, the public has just sunk lower into deprevity, so they'll look for a way to tighten their control even more...

17 posted on 08/25/2002 3:38:09 AM PDT by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glc1173@aol.com
God Bless our good old cousins on this one. We need to do the same here.

If you go through Washington, D.C. and are looking, you will see more cameras than you could ever beleive.

Regards,

21 posted on 08/25/2002 3:55:36 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glc1173@aol.com
Maybe there is hope for the BRITS afterall
24 posted on 08/25/2002 4:35:50 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glc1173@aol.com
Thanks for posting this!

But a Department of Transport spokesman said: 'Research has shown that the number of people killed or seriously injured on some dangerous stretches of road has fallen by 47 per cent after the installation of speed cameras.

You see, that's how socialism always tries to get you... One day they'll claim they can make us all 100% safe by keeping us locked in cages all day.

26 posted on 08/25/2002 6:01:12 AM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glc1173@aol.com
Although thousands of cameras have been damaged, police have not received a single message from any passing driver reporting a vandalism. As a result, no one so far has been caught damaging a camera.

Brits do not like to be watched by a Big Brother?

27 posted on 08/25/2002 6:05:40 AM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glc1173@aol.com
I must say, I really like the part about dousing the cameras with gasoline and setting them ablaze. The companies that build the things are worried about making them bulletproof (to an extent), but the "flamethrower" attack works just fine.

I'm sure it must be something familiar expressed in the Queen's English, but what exactly is a "blow lamp"?

28 posted on 08/25/2002 6:13:16 AM PDT by Cloud William
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glc1173@aol.com
I say old chap, that will give the Yard a sticky wicket.
31 posted on 08/25/2002 6:36:56 AM PDT by putupon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glc1173@aol.com
'There has been an alarming increase in the number of cameras being vandalised and this could lead to deaths on the road, through speeding.'

This is just another example of using hyperbole to justify intrusions into people's lives. The number of deaths due to speeding would not change regardless of the camera's working condition. The mere presence of the cameras (or of reasonable facsimilies, i.e. - fake cameras) will do the same to reduce speed.

If you want proof, just drive down any interstate and watch the traffic slow as soon as they see a police car parked on the side; drivers slow down even if they are doing the legal limit. I would assume that the same will then be true for camera enforcement - posting large signs that these spies are in use and making them very visible will slow drivers down; one cannot tell at a glance if the box is actually a camera or a fake.

33 posted on 08/25/2002 6:45:16 AM PDT by par4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glc1173@aol.com
I love it. They may not have their guns but the Brits have the gumption to trash the spycams.
34 posted on 08/25/2002 6:50:42 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glc1173@aol.com
Cool!!!
36 posted on 08/25/2002 10:42:27 AM PDT by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: glc1173@aol.com
If the authorities made the live pictures available for public access at a Web Cam site, then the public would demand more and more cameras at more and more locations — and not just at traffic locations.
40 posted on 08/25/2002 11:01:45 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson