Posted on 08/24/2002 6:49:15 AM PDT by rface
Edited on 05/11/2004 5:33:52 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Republican nominee Jim Talent enters the final, 10-week stretch of the U.S. Senate campaign in a stronger position than the incumbent, Sen. Jean Carnahan, D-Mo., a new poll of Missouri voters shows.
Of 801 likely voters polled statewide, 47.1 percent supported Talent, compared to 46 percent for Carnahan. The margin of error is 3.5 percentage points, which makes the matchup "too close to call," said pollster John Zogby.
(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...
Overall opinion - Jim Talent
Very favorable 29.4%
Somewhat favorable 27.5%
Somewhat unfavorable 10.3%
Very unfavorable 14.1%
Not familiar16.8%
Not sure 1.9%
Total 100.0
.
Overall opinion - Jean Carnahan
Very favorable 34.7%
Somewhat favorable 21.2%
Somewhat unfavorable 15.4%
Very unfavorable 22.5%
Not familiar 4.9%
Not sure 1.3%
Total 100.0
.
If the election for the U.S. Senate were held today and the candidates were Democrat Jean Carnahan, Republican Jim Talent and Libertarian Tamara Millay, for whom would you vote?
Carnahan 46.0%
Talent 47.1%
Millay 2.2%
Other .5%
Not sure 4.1%
Total 100.0
.
Who are you leaning toward right now?
Carnahan .4%
Talent 1.3%
Not sure 2.4%
Total 4.1%
No response or not sure 95.9%
Total 100.0
.
Importance in determining your vote for Senate - Health care costs
Very important 70.5%
Somewhat important 22.4%
Not important 6.0%
Not sure 1.1%
Total 100.0
.
Importance in determining your vote for Senate - The nation's security
Very important 79.7%
Somewhat important 17.8%
Not important 2.2%
Not sure .3%
Total 100.0
.
Importance in determining your vote for Senate - The economy
Very important 80.5%
Somewhat important 18.1%
Not important 1.0%
Not sure .4%
Total 100.0
.
Importance in determining your vote for Senate - Security of your pension or 401K
Very important 66.8%
Somewhat important 19.7%
Not important 10.9%
Not sure 2.5%
Total 100.0
.
Importance in determining your vote for Senate - Prescription drug costs
Very important 65.6%
Somewhat important 23.8%
Not important 10.0%
Not sure .6%
Total 100.0
.
18. Importance in determining your vote for Senate - U.S. foreign policy
Very important 62.7%
Somewhat important 28.4%
Not important 5.0%
Not sure 3.9%
Total 100.0
.
Importance in determining your vote for Senate - ConcerNot sure about Social Security
Very important 66.7%
Somewhat important 24.9%
Not important 8.3%
Not sure .2%
Total 100.0
.
Importance in determining your vote for Senate - Environmental issues
Very important 46.6%
Somewhat important 41.8%
Not important 11.0%
Not sure .7%
Total 100.0
.
Importance in determining your vote for Senate - Abortion
Very important 47.7%
Somewhat important 30.5%
Not important 19.1%
Not sure 2.7%
Total 100.0
.
Importance in determining your vote for Senate - Experience
Very important 49.3%
Somewhat important 38.9%
Not important 9.9%
Not sure 1.9%
Total 100.0
.
Some damn good news!..Lets just keep it that way.
Ashland, Missouri
Why am I not surprised? Gimme, gimme, gimme.
I want someone else to pay for my health care and my prescription drugs.
Zogby is always in a demoncrat-leaning mood.
--Cary, NC
What exactly are the Widow Carnahan's qualifications for the godd**ned United States Senate????
"Well, gee golly, I......um........washed my husband's drawers for decades, so I SURELY know how to help govern the most powerful nation on earth, donchaknow."
Bloody twits.
ACU Ratings for Senator Carnahan: | |
Year 2001 | 28 |
Year 2000 | |
Lifetime | 28 |
2001 Congressional Vote Breakdown:
This bill was: supported
The vote was: 58-45
This Senator voted: Negative
This bill was: defeated
The vote was: 47-51
This Senator voted: Negative
This bill was: defeated
The vote was: 41-58
This Senator voted: Negative
This bill was: adopted
The vote was: 67-33
This Senator voted: Negative
I have said for a MONTH that to get ANYTHING done in the Senate, we need to win a NET of four seats. If we only have a one-vote majority . . . again . . . either Chaffee or McCain will bolt and we'll be back to square one. BUT, if we win by 3-4, the margin actually becomes 5-7 because Breaux and Miller will suddenly vote with the majority (and in line with most of their ideology, anyway).
As of now: Toricelli trails; Wellstone trails; Carnahan trails; and Johnson trails. Hutchison leads; Dole leads. The key races will be in New Hampshire and Georgia. If we break even on those two, it will make the "working" 4-6 vote majority we need.
Among those supporters is Ruthann Hartzell of Imperial. Her reasons touched on the continued emotional power of the personal loss that landed Carnahan in the Senate.
"Senator Carnahan's husband and her son were killed in a plane accident, and my brother and dad were killed in a plane accident a few years before that," Hartzell said. "I feel like I have kind of a connection with her."
Why did we ever let women vote? (For the record, I'm female, but I'd gladly give up my vote to keep morons like Ruthann from voting.)
I actually had Talent to my home for a fund rasier when he was in Congress. He is truly a decent man with the morals and ideals that are not only good for America - but essential if we are to stop this headlong rush into mediocrity!
This cartoon typifies voting in Missouri - a state that I will never miss!
We know how Talent got his money, up front Bush fundraisers. How did Carnahan get hers ? Apparently over 2.1 million and more than likely in the neighborhood of 5 million over a very short period of time (about 19 months or about 300 k per month).
And his brother, a mouthpiece for thge ongoing infiltration of ill meaning Arabs to this country.
Raleigh( North), NC
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.