A Virginia couple was arrested in New York City Thursday for public lewdness ...They ought to consider also tacking on a charge of "Penal Law § 240.21 Disruption, or disturbance of religious service""
A person is guilty ...who makes unreasonable ...disturbance while at a lawfully assembled religious service or within one hundred feet thereof, with intent to cause annoyance or alarm or recklessly creating a risk thereof Aggravated disorderly conduct is a class A misdemeanor.
It sure sounds like they were recklessly creating a risk of disruption to me.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
To: Behind Liberal Lines
If there were any children present, the couple should be neutered. Seriously.
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Absolutely disgusting - what a bunch of PIGS. Maybe they'll get lucky and catch a disease!
7 posted on
08/16/2002 10:01:56 AM PDT by
Gerish
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Florence was rushed to St. Clares Hospital, complaining he had thrown his back out. He told cops it was a pre-existing condition. I bet the cops wish they could have thrown his back out a little more.
8 posted on
08/16/2002 10:02:49 AM PDT by
Cagey
To: Behind Liberal Lines
O & A sucks.....they're Don and Mike wannabes.
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Unbelievable," said New Yorker Ren Brown. "I try not to judge, but that's just going too far." Gee, Ron, do you think you could make just a 'bit' of a judgement and call it what it is? An unmarried couple having sex in a church and you 'don't want to judge'? What would it take for you to call it what it is? Sacrifices on the altar? Islamic rituals in the church? Even Christ threw the money changers out of the temple and if I remember the verses He was pretty upset. What has this nation come to? Don't answer I already know
To: Behind Liberal Lines
a radio stunt that outraged parishioners and church officials. I guess they're not used to heterosexual sex there.
15 posted on
08/16/2002 10:07:19 AM PDT by
stanz
To: Behind Liberal Lines; EdReform; Askel5
Note that these cowards didn't try this in an Islamic mosque.
/1/ They would be jailed for a hate crime
/2/ They would be hunted down and killed after a religious fatwa was put on them.
To: Behind Liberal Lines
I can't tell you how many times I've walked through that exact part of that cathedral with my kids. Easily dozens.
That said, even without the addresses it would've been obvious the two idiots were out of towners. There are several places within the Cathedral where you could quietly copulate without getting caught. Damn amateurs.
To: Behind Liberal Lines
I think this will establish some boundaries demanding respect.
from an old Dave Allen at Large Skit.
Parishoner: "Father is it ok to have sex before communion?"
Priest: "Yes, but please do not block the isle."
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Disgusting degenerates.
To: Behind Liberal Lines
This is just a cheap publicity stunt by a bunch of idiots who consider the Catholic Church to be a large, slow-moving target.
If these buttheads want to impress ME, I want them to do this from the Grand Mosque in Mecca.
37 posted on
08/16/2002 10:19:51 AM PDT by
Kenton
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Does anyone doubt these are typical low life ignorant gutter dwelling lice bags..inotherwords...a typical liberal. I will bet $1,000 that they all vote democrat. Human scum.
41 posted on
08/16/2002 10:22:43 AM PDT by
Sungirl
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Unbelievable," said New Yorker Ren Brown. "I try not to judge, but that's just going too far."Maybe this is the problem? But don't worry, I'm sure a jury of their peers (all devout Chatholics I hope) will. Then these people can have all the risky sex they want - in prison!
46 posted on
08/16/2002 10:26:54 AM PDT by
anymouse
To: Behind Liberal Lines
The next thing you know, Opie and Anthony will offer a thousand points if a president can insert a cigar into an intern while world leaders wait in the Rose Garden and then finish himself off in the sink. Oh, wait. That's already been done, hasn't it?
To: Behind Liberal Lines; Travis McGee
The airwaves are a public resource. I see no reason why this station should be allowed to operate.
Pull their license.
To: Behind Liberal Lines
so apparently the name of the radio show should be "How to Show Utter Disrespect at the Lowest Level". That's what this is....it's not "sex in a risky place"...it is proving that they can completely disrespect a world famous cathedral, and all its occupants, by having sex for kicks. They don't care about themselves....they don't care about others. Disgusting.
72 posted on
08/16/2002 10:43:29 AM PDT by
ZinGirl
To: Behind Liberal Lines
F**king idiots!!
To: Behind Liberal Lines
A couple having sex in a church would get 25 points, according to a list of 54 sites around the city seized from Mercurio. If St. Patricks was named as one of those 54 sites is this an anti-Catholic hate crime? I would like to see that list.
To: Behind Liberal Lines
Time to FREEP FCC Chairman Michael K. Powell
mpowell@fcc.gov.
Chairman Powell,
I ask that you investigate and prosecute WNEW-FM for their funding and broadcasting of a public sex act in St. Patrick's Cathedral during religious services. As part of the "Opie and Anthony" radio show, the station paid $7,000 for a couple to have sex during the a religious service only five feet from parishioners. I am outraged by this perversion of our nation's airwaves and their use to fund this sick activity during a solemn mass in a church. I ask you to personally see that the FCC does everything it can to punish this abuse, including rescinding this station's broadcast license.
To: Behind Liberal Lines
It's not unusual to see human scum gravitate towards show biz. And lacking the talent and wit to be intertaining....they normally resort to lewd and sophomoric sexual pranks. I think they are stuck in that childhood stage where they think it's funny to see some grown up's pee pee.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson