Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Make liberals safe, legal and rare (ANN COULTER)
worldnetdaily ^ | August 14, 2002 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 08/14/2002 5:04:42 PM PDT by anncoulteriscool

Make liberals safe, legal and rare

Posted: August 14, 2002

6:45 p.m. Eastern

Whenever a liberal begins a peevish complaint with "of course, we all agree ..." your antennae should go up. This is how liberals couch statements they assume all Americans would demand they make, but which they secretly chafe at.

Liberal sophistry requires pretending they support, for example, sexual abstinence (for teenagers) and marriage (between heterosexuals); making abortion and drug use "rare"; America's winning the war on terrorism – and before that, winning the Cold War. Fascinatingly, their proposals for achieving these goals are invariably the opposite of what any normal person might think would work.

Instead of punishing bad behavior and rewarding good behavior, liberals often feel it is the better part of valor to reward bad behavior and punish good behavior. Of course, we all agree that Fidel Castro is a bad man. That's why we need to lift travel restrictions and trade with Cuba! Of course, we all agree that abortion should be "rare." That's why all reasonable regulations of abortion must be fought against like wild banshees! (One proven method of making something "rare" is to make it illegal.)

Their comically counterintuitive positions are inevitably backed up with long, complicated explanations about the dire risk of encouraging "hard-liners," the enemy's "paranoia," or clever points such as "teenagers will have sex anyway." The arguments not only make no sense ab initio, but openly contradict one another.

While pretending to oppose drug use, the New York Times has supported programs to give addicts needles, referring in a 1998 editorial to "some interesting new ideas" such as "needle exchanges." In the case of cigarettes, however, liberals enthusiastically embrace the otherwise mystifying concept of punishing bad behavior.

Thus, the Times has cheered on Mayor Michael Bloomberg's obsessive desire to outlaw smoking, referring to his proposed ban on smoking in bars as an attempt to close "a major loophole in the city's anti-smoking law." Aren't people going to smoke anyway? Why not make smoking "safe, legal and rare" – just like abortion?

The liberal clergy at the Times have criticized sex education programs that purport to discourage sexual activity among teenagers, while unaccountably neglecting to hand out condoms and scented candles.

Times theater critic Frank Rich has rhapsodically supported Joycelyn Elders' genius idea of teaching children to masturbate: "The more people talk about masturbation, the more fears can be dispelled among those young people." (Thirteen-year-old boys could probably teach him a few tricks.)

So it was striking that a recent op-ed piece in the Times opposed a Bush administration's plan to encourage marriage. Needless to say, it included the ritualistic disclaimer: "Of course, none of this is to say that marriage is not a wonderful institution." It seems that, in this one case, "we don't need government programs to convince people ... that marriage is good for them."

We do, however, urgently need government programs to teach them that dying of AIDS is bad for them. (At least, we finally have the left on record opposing some federal government program other than national defense and an independent counsel investigating a Democrat.)

Currently, liberals pretend to be rooting for America in the war on terrorism. To show their support, they oppose America doing anything. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said: "We are all prepared to give the men and women in law enforcement the latitude necessary to protect our nation." Despite what "we all" support, Durbin said using appearance to sort potential terrorists from non-terrorists "reflects not only poor judgment, but poor law enforcement."

Really? Which law enforcement experts concluded that surveilling angry Middle Eastern men with smoke pouring out of their trousers would be "poor law enforcement"? Seems unlikely. For some reason, liberals think it's fun to give Arab terrorists a chance.

Democrats claim to support invading Iraq – just not yet! As the Associated Press recently reported, "the Democrats always preface comments on Iraq with a general statement that Saddam must go." Of course, we all agree that Saddam must go. But first – there are many worthless objections to be raised.

Sore loser Al Gore has said that before invading Iraq we need to establish peace in the Mideast, create a perfect Jeffersonian democracy in Afghanistan, and get the American-hating French and Germans on board. Also invent cold fusion and put a man on Mars. Then will the time be ripe for a pre-emptive attack!

Liberals also carped pointlessly about the war in Afghanistan last fall. Their principal complaint was that we were going to lose. Among many, many other liberals, columnist Maureen Dowd raised the specter of Vietnam and called Afghanistan "another quagmire." She said that Rear Adm. John Stufflebeem "may be the last to know that Afghanistan is a stubborn and durable place."

After we routed the Taliban approximately five minutes later, Dowd said, "The liberation of Afghanistan is a wonderful thing, of course." Of course. And something you said we couldn't do.

"Of course, we all agree" always means liberals don't agree, but are under no illusions about the popularity of what they really believe.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anncoulter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

1 posted on 08/14/2002 5:04:43 PM PDT by anncoulteriscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
Another great wednesday evening column from Ms. Coulter!
2 posted on 08/14/2002 5:06:29 PM PDT by anncoulteriscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
Of Course we all support the idea of a republican senate !!!!!!!!!
3 posted on 08/14/2002 5:07:25 PM PDT by anncoulteriscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
Man I love her writing.
4 posted on 08/14/2002 5:13:05 PM PDT by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
Right Ann, they Democrats and liberals are behind us 100% on everything. Of course, it's the best place to be when you plan on shoving a knife into someone's back.
5 posted on 08/14/2002 5:13:10 PM PDT by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
Bump
6 posted on 08/14/2002 5:13:20 PM PDT by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
bump.
7 posted on 08/14/2002 5:14:48 PM PDT by NEWwoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
I think I like her columns (even) more than her book. She doesn't hold anything back and usually gets me rolling on the floor laughing.

Her book was still great, but it seemed like she was holding back just a little bit..

The liberal position is naturally funny when someone tries to put it on paper. Coulter's the current King(Queen) of pointing out the absurdity of our foes. Rush used to be really good at this but has gotten a little more serious in recent years.

8 posted on 08/14/2002 5:16:06 PM PDT by Isle of sanity in CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Spread the word . . .
9 posted on 08/14/2002 5:18:15 PM PDT by BraveMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
 (One proven method of making something "rare" is to make it illegal.)

Really?  Which activities have become rare since they were
              made illegal?  Rape?  Drug use?  Robbery?

10 posted on 08/14/2002 5:19:36 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool; RonDog
Coulter bump
11 posted on 08/14/2002 5:22:24 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
There's nothing wrong with a liberal that a lobotomy (performed by an intoxicated welding school graduate) can't fix.
12 posted on 08/14/2002 5:22:26 PM PDT by DWSUWF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
I ordered her new book a few nights ago...I can't wait!
13 posted on 08/14/2002 5:23:59 PM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
That would require the services of many firing squads...
14 posted on 08/14/2002 5:24:31 PM PDT by Vidalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
Ann Coulter makes common sense fun. I would offer one tiny amendment to this, though:

Of course, we all agree that abortion should be "rare." That's why all reasonable regulations of abortion must be fought against like wild banshees! (One proven method of making something "rare" is to make it illegal.)

An even more proven method of making something rare is to tax the bejeezus out of it, according to our liberal brethren. So, if they want abortion to be rare, I'm sure they wouldn't object to putting a tax of, say, $10,000 on each abortion, would they?

15 posted on 08/14/2002 5:25:26 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Really? Which activities have become rare since they were made illegal? Rape? Drug use? Robbery?

Cute, but specious.

If you look at the incidence of such events per population of 100,000, you'll find that such events are both illegal, and rare (with the exception of drug use, which is encouraged by probitive laws, as opposed to limited by them).

Be Seeing You,

Chris

16 posted on 08/14/2002 5:27:41 PM PDT by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
While on the surface, from a merely academic point of view, Coutler's column may appear disjointed and bad form(to most liberal AC-haters who review an utterance she makes), but Ann is really using *every* sentence to expose the duplicity and hypocrisy of the left.

Good going, Ann! Brave Ann!
17 posted on 08/14/2002 5:28:47 PM PDT by Freemeorkillme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
I would love to see all of her articles in book form, or a library full of Annisms.
18 posted on 08/14/2002 5:28:58 PM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
I just love Ann's way with words, I can just see the libs cringing in agony IF they read her statements of truth. It's a pity they only read the inside front cover to anything. LOVE THIS GAL
<(hugs)>
19 posted on 08/14/2002 5:29:05 PM PDT by Uncle George
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anncoulteriscool
ab initio this is poetry in prose.
20 posted on 08/14/2002 5:29:09 PM PDT by PieroC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson