Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Widow's children help her cope
The Beacon Journal (Akron, Ohio) ^ | Aug. 14, 2002 | Karalee Miller

Posted on 08/14/2002 4:37:43 PM PDT by ResistorSister

JuWanna Taylor, widow of slain Massillon Patrolman Eric B. Taylor, is finding the strength to cope from the most precious gifts her husband gave her: their two young children.

``My children are what have kept me going,'' Taylor said Tuesday at the family's home in Massillon. ``You have to put you on the back burner. They need their mother.''

Taylor, 31, said she has tried to keep her children, Ty, 2, and Lauren, 1, as close to their regular daily schedules as possible since her husband was shot and killed Friday night while on duty. Eric Taylor, 31, joined the Massillon department in 1998.

``He's usually here,'' she said. ``Now, Mom's here instead of Dad. I've just tried to keep them in as much of a routine as possible.''

The routine for the household saw Tuesdays as Dad's day with the children, Taylor said.

``He let me have a day to myself. He was an excellent father.''

As the days go by, Taylor said, coping with her husband's death is becoming more difficult.

``When everything happened (on Friday), I just went numb. And since then, there has always been somebody here... This is the first time I've kind of been by myself,'' she said. ``The numbness is starting to wear off.''

Whether it was playing with the children or doing household chores, Taylor said her husband always took care of his family.

``There are not many men out there like that,'' she said, ``but my husband was. He cooked, he cleaned, he changed diapers. He did everything... We raised our children together.''

Taylor said she also has found comfort in the many friends and family members who have been by her side.

``We're just staying here and making sure she's OK,'' said JuMekia Jones, JuWanna Taylor's sister. Jones, 24, arrived from California on Saturday.

The first time Taylor saw her future husband, she knew he was someone special.

``I said to my friend, `Ooh, that's a cute guy,' '' Taylor said, remembering when they met in 1994. Her friend happened to know Eric and called him over.

``We exchanged phone numbers that night,'' Taylor said. ``On the way home, I told my friend, `He's going to be my husband.' ''

Five years later, he was.

Her husband's line of work was a worry for Taylor in the past.

``Lately, I didn't worry much at all,'' she said. ``I just thought this (Massillon) was a safe place to work.''

When one of Eric Taylor's fellow officers pulled into the family's driveway Friday night to inform JuWanna her husband had been shot, she thought it was her husband coming home, she said.

``My husband would check on us a lot,'' she said.

Even when the officer rang the doorbell, she still didn't think anything of it, she said.

``I just thought he forgot his key at work,'' she said. ``I just opened the door and walked away from it.''

When the officer told her that her husband had been shot, Taylor said she ``freaked out.''

``I froze,'' she said. ``I said, `I've got to get my babies.' ''

Taylor said Massillon police officers have shared information surrounding her husband's death so she can know as much as possible.

``He engaged the suspect, not knowing he was armed,'' she said officers told her.

Taylor said officers told her that her husband tried to exit his car through the passenger-side door when Donald W. Matthews, 61, of Jackson Township fired.

``The car was still in drive and kept rolling, but he managed to escape from the car,'' she said.

When the gunfire ceased, Eric Taylor, who was wearing a bulletproof vest, had been fatally shot. Matthews also had been shot dead.

While her husband always had a way of making others smile, Taylor said it was tough to get him to grin for a camera.

``He wasn't big on taking pictures,'' she said, laughing. Taylor said she had to ``basically beg'' her husband to sit for a family photo about six months ago.

``I am so glad I did that,'' she said.

Taylor said she has been overwhelmed by the community's outpouring of support.

``I can't express into words how appreciative I am and how it feels to know that he has gotten a response like this,'' she said.

Calling hours will be from 3 to 9 p.m. Thursday at the Stewart & Calhoun funeral home, 529 W. Thornton St. in Akron. There also will be calling hours from 9 to 11 a.m. Friday at the House of the Lord, 1650 Diagonal Road in Akron. The funeral service will begin at 11 a.m.

Following the ceremony, Eric Taylor will be buried at Mount Peace Cemetery, 183 Aqueduct St. in Akron.

JuWanna Taylor said the services may bring ``a small amount of closure.''

``But also then it's the beginning of a life without him,'' she said. ``That's going to be the toughest.''


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: inthelineofduty; massillon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400401-405 next last
To: dcwusmc
As far as I can see, Matthews was wrong, now he's DEAD wrong. The cop's family has my condolences. I know it's a terrible time for them.

Thanks for the post, dcwusmc.

361 posted on 08/15/2002 11:56:19 AM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Matthews had no "inalienable right" to violate the legal prohibition against driving without a license. Admit it.

362 posted on 08/15/2002 11:57:27 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: justshe
Seeing that "hijacking the thread" is in your imagination, I can't comment.

BTW, that old "unclean" quote is dredged up, out of context, every time somebody can't make a rational comeback to my comments.
It's becoming a silly tactic.
363 posted on 08/15/2002 11:59:44 AM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
I hate to be taking the same side as Eastforker here, but in NY and NJ the county and state police removed the bubble lights from police cruisers. The trouble was motorists would see the bubbles in the distance and slow down. The state/counties wanted more money so they removed the bubble lights from the cop cars thereby making it more difficult to spot the cruisers. Speed limits in this part of the country are ridiculous with 55mph being the most common. Nobody drives that slow around here. Traffic enforcement IS used for revenue collection.

Though the scum bag who shot Patrolman taylor should rot in hell.
364 posted on 08/15/2002 12:01:43 PM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Got the hardly waits, dontcha?

CJ, if you types 'win', FR will cease to exist.
365 posted on 08/15/2002 12:02:35 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]

To: one_particular_harbour
Cuckoo Cuckoo Cuckoo!!
366 posted on 08/15/2002 12:06:25 PM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: one_particular_harbour
LOL!
367 posted on 08/15/2002 12:10:11 PM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
"Matthews had no "inalienable right" to violate the legal prohibition against driving without a license. Admit it."
________________________________

-- I never said he did. Admit it.
368 posted on 08/15/2002 12:13:39 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Did Matthews have an "inalienable right" to violate the legal prohibition against driving without a license?

Quit dodging the question. A simple yes or no will do.
369 posted on 08/15/2002 12:15:12 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
Again, cuckoo cuckoo cuckoo.
370 posted on 08/15/2002 12:22:23 PM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies]

To: gunnedah
Folks not to make anyone mad but the problem with our country is its leaders.They use people like officer Taylor like a pawn and he did his job out of concern for his fellow Americans and his belief in the system.He should not have to and will not have died in vain if we all awakwen.

It is not the government's fault that Matthews murdered Officer Taylor.

371 posted on 08/15/2002 12:22:26 PM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: southern rock
So I can drive 135mph if I want to?
372 posted on 08/15/2002 12:25:56 PM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111
So I can drive 135mph if I want to?

Well, you have to claim that traffic laws violate your "inalienable rights" first.

373 posted on 08/15/2002 12:29:01 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: ChuckHam
If you (scum sucking defenders) have a problem with this, feel free to freep-mail me and I'll be glad to give you my address so we can have a face-to-face chat about it.

I share the same mindset as you. However, why insult the "scum sucking" be comparing them to this tripe? ;-)

374 posted on 08/15/2002 12:32:40 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Dream on roscoe, -- that you will some day have the power to frame the questions, and force the answers.
375 posted on 08/15/2002 12:32:44 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Matthews spouted the same nonsense you do.
376 posted on 08/15/2002 12:36:35 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]

To: southern rock
Since I personally don't believe that it is constitutional to require licences for driving or to allow agents of the state to harass drivers peacefully going about their buisness, I'd have to say yes, it is wrong to stop a driver for simply driving, and not harming anyone.

That makes no sense. A drivers license is not required for driving on private property. But it is required for the public roads.

I could drive my late uncle's old deuce-and-a-quarter on my grandma's farm in Arkansas at the age of 8. No harm, no foul. Now place me on I-40 at 8.

See the difference?

377 posted on 08/15/2002 12:36:39 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe

"The question really is; when will you [roscoe] snap and kill someone?"


Backwards. I reject your ideology.
- roscoe -

Exactly the point. - You reject that men have inalienable rights. You advocate that authority can violate such rights.

When will your attitude lead to someone being killed?

378 posted on 08/15/2002 12:39:59 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
You reject that men have inalienable rights.

Matthews had no "inalienable right" to drive without a license, notwithstanding the ignorant nutjobs who claim that licensing laws violate the Constition.

379 posted on 08/15/2002 12:42:27 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
I see. No comment to YOUR quote by JR? BTW......JR answered on the other thread. I agree with CJ.
380 posted on 08/15/2002 12:44:56 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400401-405 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson