Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Needs Pro-Investor Tax Cuts
Human Events ^ | 8/12/02 | Lawrence Kudlow

Posted on 08/09/2002 2:39:43 PM PDT by Jean S

It’s not front-page corporate scandals that will sink the Republicans in this year’s midterm elections. Their problem is not, as Al Gore believes, a new generation of special interests and power brokers who are trying to take advantage of the American people. If the Republican Party suffers this fall, the unexpected stock-market plunge will be why.

For many decades, voters have associated the Republican Party with big business. Today, it’s just as popular—or unpopular—as it always has been. About 35% of voters approve of big business, and 65% approve of small business. Nothing has changed on this front.

What has changed, however, is that the majority of voters today link Republicans with the stock market. And they want to know why their 401(k)s have turned into 201(k)s. This will be the pivotal issue in the fall.

With that in mind, if the GOP cannot reach out to investors with a series of new tax incentives that can revive the lowly animal spirits of the stock market in particular, and business in general, it’s going to be a rough November for the right.

So far, the debates over speeding up the Bush income tax cut of 2001 and reducing the capital-gains tax rate have been class-warfare driven and contentious at best. That’s why Republican lawmakers need to get creative. There are still a bunch of constructive proposals that can bring smiles to investor-class faces, and "R"-column votes this fall.

One simple measure would be to put stock market investors on the same footing as homeowners by making turnovers of stock tax-free. So unlocking past equity gains will not be a taxable event. Another measure would be a doubling of the $3,000 capital-loss deduction. Both of these proposals would mean higher gains for shareholders and more cash oxygen for the market.

Reducing taxation on dividends would be another pro-investor move. When a corporation pays out dividends to its investors it implies that it has plenty of cash in the bank. Whether or not investors have faith in a company’s books, they will be impressed with large dividends. But right now, dividends are taxed on both the corporate level and the personal level. Relieving this double-taxation would mean more dividends for investors and more confidence in the market. They’d be impressed.

Also, as Investor’s Business Daily Publisher Bill O’Neil suggests, giving new business start-ups tax-free status for a couple of years would be a nice incentive for entrepreneurs. Unhindered by corporate taxation, businesses could get into gear more quickly. After a set period, they could be taxed at half the normal corporate rate and then graduate to the full rate after they have had a chance to establish.

Finally, supply-side father Arthur Laffer proposes that investors who purchase stock in the next year, and hold it for three years, have the ability to cash in that stock free of capital-gains penalties. That incentive would get needed dollars into the market—right now.

GOP lawmakers have a lot going their way. First, the economic situation is not that bad. Normally, an economy will grow at 6% to 7% in its first year of recovery. But the domestic economy has grown at 3.8% annually over the past three quarters. While the economy certainly could be doing better, it is still expanding. We are in a recovery.

Even the soft 1.1% growth rate in second-quarter GDP has its silver linings—such as a 12% rise in technology capital spending and a near 3% increase in gross domestic purchases (which exclude the widening trade gap). So throw those double-dip recession scenarios out the window.

Republicans can also count out the usual political issues of high unemployment and high inflation. These are not problems today. And as for the corporate scandals, the President and congressional Republicans inoculated themselves from a voter backlash by supporting a business-reform bill and preventing the establishment of a new runaway regulatory agency.

Yes, voters perceive Republicans as the defenders of business. But most voters, and especially shareholding voters (who are the majority), know full well that healthy businesses are the engine of jobs and economic growth.

What will matter most come this November is the state of the stock market. By promoting a package of new tax incentives—and pushing for a Federal Reserve expansion of the basic money supply to aid debt-crunched businesses—Republicans can save their necks. But they must craft a new growth plan aimed directly at the very investor class that will tip this election one way or the other.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: corporatescandals; taxreform

1 posted on 08/09/2002 2:39:43 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *Taxreform
Index Bump
2 posted on 08/09/2002 2:58:44 PM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
I wonder if freepers will jump on Kudlow for urging the GOP and Bush to take action to help investors. I was gang-pummeled here when I started a post that essentially said the same thing.
3 posted on 08/09/2002 3:17:36 PM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Pro-investor? Try pro-worker, pro-saver,pro-consumer,pro-freedom, tax cuts.
4 posted on 08/09/2002 3:55:02 PM PDT by AdamSelene235
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
How predictable: Kudlow favors a "pro-growth tax cut."

Unfortunately just putting a nice name on something doesn't produce the results that the name implies. Anyone who chooses to put any extra money they get into this overvalued stock market selling at high multiples of ficticious earnings deserves what they get. Those selling to the bigger fools will benefit.

5 posted on 08/09/2002 4:00:23 PM PDT by Deuce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Deuce
Any tax-cut is a good tax cut.
6 posted on 08/09/2002 4:23:21 PM PDT by Chairman Fred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
any tax cut is a good tax cut;
7 posted on 08/09/2002 4:38:46 PM PDT by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
How about immediate increases in the annual deductibles for investing in IRA's, SEP's, and C/S Corp retirement plans? Do this, and eliminate the income phaseouts on deductibility for IRA's and Roths, and you will see money flowing back into stocks.
8 posted on 08/09/2002 4:55:06 PM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
If I go to Vegas, can I get a tax cut for investing in slot machines & roulett? Hey! A gambles a gamble...right


If the terrorists hate us for our freedoms….
The simple solution is to take our freedoms away

Suzie_Cue

9 posted on 08/09/2002 5:05:16 PM PDT by Suzie_Cue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chairman Fred
Any (and every) tax-cut is a good tax cut.
10 posted on 08/09/2002 5:05:52 PM PDT by CJinVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
We need to eliminate the limitation on deductibility of net capital losses. Of course, eliminating the income tax and the IRS altogether would be best.
11 posted on 08/09/2002 5:36:07 PM PDT by TheCPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Suzie_Cue

If the terrorists hate us for our freedoms….
The simple solution is to take our freedoms away

BINGO!

Give the lady a gold star.  Thanks to the Democrats and Republicans in Congress passing and Dubya signing the USA (UN-)Patriot Act, our own government is doing more to bring this nation down than the terrorists could ever dream of doing, with a hundred planes.

I think I'm beginning to understand exactly what "compassionate conservatism" is really all about - disassembling the Constitution.

Thanks, Dubya.

 

12 posted on 08/09/2002 9:22:25 PM PDT by Action-America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
This one is DOA politically, and ludicrous from a public policy perspective to boot. Just why capital gains should be given a more favorable tax treatment than interest income has always escaped me. The two economically are fungible. Cutting taxes on investment income everytime a bubble unwinds is simply laughable. It is far better for this economy that equities be reasonably priced, and particularly for the young who are adding to their portfolio rather than taking from it. Kudlow is getting to be more of a greedy geezer every day.
13 posted on 08/09/2002 10:15:52 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson