Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Morford deserves a quick and fair review of charges (Traficant Prosecutor)
Youngstown Vindicator ^ | August 4, 2002

Posted on 08/04/2002 7:37:04 PM PDT by PJ-Comix

Fairness demands that the Justice Department expeditiously investigate allegations of prosecutorial misconduct against Craig Morford, the assistant U.S. attorney who is largely responsible for James A. Traficant Jr.'s being behind bars.

Morford is one of three men being considered by the White House for the position of U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Ohio, and dragging out the investigation could hurt his chances. He already was passed over once — despite his exceptional record as a federal prosecutor in Cleveland.

The allegations against Morford were made by Richard Detore, the former chief operating officer of USAerospace Group, a Cafaro Co. enterprise, during his sworn testimony before the House ethics committee. The panel was deciding whether Traficant should be expelled from the House.

Detore appeared as a witness for the former 17th District congressman and claimed that Morford and FBI agents wanted him to lie about Traficant when the federal government was building its case against the Poland Democrat.

Detore equated his experience to "a Nazi interrogation" and said that Morford was out of control, shouting and throwing papers and pencils at him.

Denial

The assistant U.S. attorney has denied Detore's allegations. It is important to point out that Detore has been indicted on allegations of bribing Traficant. His trial is scheduled for November.

Therefore, it is fair for the White House to question the motives behind Detore's testimony. Surely he knew that Morford was up for the appointment and that his accusations could be damaging.

Even Rep. Steven LaTourette, R-Madison, a friend of Traficant's, said that Detore's testimony might not be credible. LaTourette, a former prosecutor, said people were always claiming that he had engaged in some sort of prosecutorial misconduct. He also said he is not sure whether the testimony has any bearing on Morford's candidacy for the top job in the Justice Department's Cleveland office.

Nonetheless, because Detore testified under oath, the White House should look into the matter.

Last year, when we endorsed Morford for the position we described him as an individual whose credentials "are superior by any standard." There's been no reason for us to change our opinion.

His performance as the chief prosecutor in the Traficant trial, which resulted in the expelled congressman's conviction on 10 criminal charges, was nearly perfect. Traficant, serving as his own lawyer, tried to turn the proceedings into a circus. Morford kept his cool and built his case on the testimony of witnesses and the evidence compiled by the FBI.

Prison sentence

Traficant is serving an eight-year sentence, handed down Tuesday by Judge Lesley Brooks Wells, and while he attempted to denigrate Morford, the jury found that the government had proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

Traficant's conviction is only part of the FBI's and Justice Department's crackdown on government corruption and organized crime in the Mahoning Valley. As we noted last year, the crime-fighting campaign would not have succeeded to the extent that it did without Morford's commitment to rid the region of corrupt public officials and mobsters.

The fact that mob boss Lenine Strollo entered into a plea agreement with the government and is now a witness for the prosecution is proof of Morford's strength as a prosecutor. Once caught, many of the Valley's criminals sought plea agreements.

Ohio Sens. Mike DeWine and George V. Voinovich submitted three names to the White House for the U.S. attorney's position in Cleveland. We would urge them to reward a dedicated, hard-working, successful prosecutor with their strong support.

We are confident that the White House investigation into Detore's allegations will result in Morford's being vindicated.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: craigmorford; jimtraficant
We are confident that the White House investigation into Detore's allegations will result in Morford's being vindicated.

Don't be so confident. The case against Traficant has stunk since the get-go and now it appears that the motivation for Prosecutor Morford to get a conviction of by Traficant by any means possible was career advancement. BTW, you can vote in a Vindicator Online Poll on this question of:

Should the U.S. Justice Dept. investigate possible prosecutorial misconduct in the Traficant case?

Vote HERE to cast your ballot.

1 posted on 08/04/2002 7:37:04 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
LaTourette, a former prosecutor, said people were always claiming that he had engaged in some sort of prosecutorial misconduct

This kind of comment ought to be a red flag. If people are "always" claiming he engages in misconduct, perhaps there is a reason for that.

2 posted on 08/04/2002 8:14:31 PM PDT by knuthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knuthom
I agree. The more I read about this case, the more it STINKS of judicial corruption. Morford seems to have been going after Traficant PRIMARILY because he felt it was a great way to advance his career.
3 posted on 08/04/2002 8:21:40 PM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
69.51% YES
4 posted on 08/04/2002 11:51:22 PM PDT by brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brat
Now just a little higher with these current results:

Yes 69.57 % (958)

No 30.43 % (419)

Total Votes: 1377

The tide might be turning on this since even Traficant's hometown newspaper, no friend to Traficant, is calling for the investigation of the prosecutor in this case. Please cast your vote in this poll to make it overwhelming in favor of investigating Morford and the rest of the judicial railroaders. You can vote once per day so if you voted yesterday you can vote again today....and tomorrow. Just a few more points to hit that magic 75% yes vote.

Cast your vote HERE.

5 posted on 08/05/2002 4:14:13 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: brat
Facts pure and simple: Attorneys can not be trusted.
Lawyers in America have to much control and authority without enough checks and balances.As with police officers,who do you expect to stand up against a corrupt lawyer or judge,another lawyer.Think about it.America does not have any checks and balances when it comes to the judicial system. It all begins and ends with a lawyer and everything in between is controlled by lawyers,some would call it a monopoly.
6 posted on 08/05/2002 4:19:16 AM PDT by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gunnedah
It still amazes me that Judge Leslie Wells did not RECUSE herself from judgement in the Traficant case since her husband, Charles Clark, has had lucrative business deals with the prosecution's chief witness, John Cafaro (who admitted lying in a previous case). Right now there are rising calls for the investigation of Traficant's prosecutor, Craig Morford. Okay, how about also including the judicial abuse by Judge Wells?
7 posted on 08/05/2002 4:55:49 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: gunnedah
Look at the record. Witnesses who agree to testify/lie about Traficant (Cafaro) get drastically reduced sentences in other cases (even though he committed perjury). Witnesses who REFUSE to testify/lie about Traficant (Detore) gets the book thrown at him. Oh, and NO physical evidence against Traficant. All hearsay evidence from very questionable witnesses.

Please take this into consideration you Pennsylvania Ave lurkers out there who are considering whether or not to appoint Morford to U.S. Attroney.

8 posted on 08/05/2002 7:35:15 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
This is the way government operates and to a certain extent they need this ability. But in saying that herein lies the problem,Informers,especially those who do it bigtime are mostly big time crooks and they use the goverment to violate the law and cover some of their crimes. Informers have become better than anyone at using the system and that is why it is probably time to stop it.\In some cases the informer commits worse crimes than those he informs on and gets away with it for turning someone else in.
9 posted on 08/05/2002 1:46:51 PM PDT by gunnedah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson