More Americans Die And Bush Just Talks (posted 8/2/2002)

8/2/02 | ME

[A2J]

Thousands of Americans die on September 11, 2001. President Bush responds with a military offensive that is presently stalled. Al Quieda remains and continues to grow.

Five Americans die in a suicide bomber attack in Israel. President Bush responds with an offensive of words expressing “anger” and that Arafat must be removed, and yet the little rag-head remains.

Is President Bush nothing more than a re-warmed version of Jimmy Carter? I hope not, but I really don’t see much of a difference.

[A2J]

I'm so disappointed in Bush. I honestly believe that he is more interested in protecting his poll numbers than doing what is right in annihilating terrorism.

[Dog Gone]

I can't believe you think this clueless rant deserves its own thread.

[jokar]

I'm surprised you can see anything with your head tucked in your ass like that.

That would explain his crappy outlook.

[Born to be Wild]

It seems Dubya likes to talk big and carry a small stick!

[lavaroise]

I'm so disappointed in Bush. I honestly believe that he is more interested in protecting his poll numbers than doing what is right in annihilating terrorism.

Welcome to Democracy. It does wake up but goes back to sleep quite quickly. I can't figure it out either. but I guess no one wants a dictatorship during war, so be it.

[jwfiv]

Yer whining fer all the wrong reasons, pardner. Relax, cool down, leave this war to the grown ups.

Dubya's no Carter. The war ain't stalled.

[chesty_puller]

Ya beat me to it!!!

[RANGERAIRBORNE]

Of the people who actually ran for President, and had a real chance to be ellected (that excludes fringe kooks like the Libertarians), who do you think would be handling the greatest crisis since 1962 any better than Bush and his team?

Just curious.

[cousair]

This story is stupid. We all know what Bush can and will do to go after Hamas.

[RightResponse]

Would you like to give us your step-by-step plan to eradicate terrorism? With the power and force of the U.S., and the experience and capabilities of the Israeli forces unable to effectively eliminate terrorism, I'm sure you will be hailed as a genious and savior to all the human race when we hear from you on how to do it.

[Born to be Wild]

Talk's cheap.

[marvlus]

Of the people who actually ran for President, and had a real chance to be ellected (that excludes fringe kooks like the Libertarians), who do you think would be handling the greatest crisis since 1962 any better than Bush and his team?

Jesse Jackson??

[A2J]

It seems Dubya likes to talk big and carry a small stick!

I believe that Bush is a good man but is either surrounded by incompetent boobs or just doesn't know how to handle the tough situations.

Even domestically, he has wandered aimlessly, mostly following the lead of the Democrats.

[Neets]

First, I don't see how this belongs on the NEWS side as it is clearly a vanity, and second, what more exactly is it you want him to about the "Rag-head"? And thirdly, maybe you shoulda ran for president.

[Born to be Wild]

"Would you like to give us your step-by-step plan to eradicate terrorism? "

We elected Bush to do that!

[A2J]

Yer whining fer all the wrong reasons, pardner. Relax, cool down, leave this war to the grown ups.

Dubya's no Carter. The war ain't stalled.

There hasn't been a grownup in the White House since Reagan.

And where is "war" moving then?

[Republican Wildcat]

Ridiculous and clueless. I suggest doing something more productive with your time than posting such threads--like getting informed.

[RightResponse]

Well, let's get our money's worth and have him stamp out random senseless murder, too!