Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FBI Leak Probe Irks Lawmakers (Many Spurn Polygraph Requests...)
The Washington Post ^ | Friday, August 2, 2002 | Dana Priest

Posted on 08/01/2002 9:07:56 PM PDT by kristinn

FBI agents have questioned nearly all 37 members of the Senate and House intelligence committees and have asked many if they would be willing to submit to lie detector tests as part of a broad investigation into leaks of classified information related to the Sept. 11 attacks, according to officials involved in the inquiry.

Most of the lawmakers have told the FBI they would refuse a polygraph, citing the constitutional separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches of government and the unreliability of the exam, those involved in the inquiry said.

Although the chairmen of the intelligence committees, Sen. Bob Graham (D-Fla.) and Rep. Porter J. Goss (R-Fla.), asked the FBI to conduct the inquiry, its unprecedented scale has angered some lawmakers, according to people close to the investigation. The lawmakers are unhappy that the FBI, an agency they oversee, is investigating them.

See source link for the rest of the story

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: kgb; politburo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: kristinn
A light coating of hot tar and feathers comes to mind followd by a ride on a donkey to the pillory for display and individual citizen's scorn. Rotten tomatoes and cabbage throwing to be encouraged.
21 posted on 08/02/2002 2:33:05 AM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Although the chairmen of the intelligence committees, Sen. Bob Graham (D-Fla.) and Rep. Porter J. Goss (R-Fla.), asked the FBI to conduct the inquiry, its unprecedented scale has angered some lawmakers,

Apparently they thought it was going to be a Clinton era DOJ whitewash. Ashcroft has disappointed me, but this article indicates to me that he and Mueller must be doing something right.

22 posted on 08/02/2002 2:43:20 AM PDT by NEPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour
The elected officals, that you and I sent there to represent us, are so corrupt and morally bankrupt that the laws that apply to you and I they fell they are exempt from having to comply with.

VOTERS REMEMBER ON ELECTION DAY THAT IT'S TIME TO TAKE OUT THE TRASH !!

23 posted on 08/02/2002 2:57:58 AM PDT by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Anyone who thinks that lie detector "testing" is a good idea doesn't know about "the lie behind the lie detector."


24 posted on 08/02/2002 2:58:26 AM PDT by George Maschke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

This Congressional stance is so hideously over the top, where does one begin?

I am sick to death of the jerks in Congress who think they in their ivory tower are above my life being protected.

As the panel's hearings began, stories appeared about the NSA intercepts, drawing a heated White House rebuke. Vice President Cheney telephoned Goss and Graham to chastise them for the disclosures, while presidential spokesman Ari Fleischer said the information was "alarmingly specific" and could compromise the war on terrorism. Administration officials said the leaks could be a federal crime.

McCain's comments are particularly nauseating, particularly galling, since he is the son and grandson of admirals and was held in Viet Nam and should, by now, have figured out a few things about wartime leaks.

And then there's this piece of hooey. "Ranit Schmelzer, spokeswoman for Senate Majority Leader Thomas A. Daschle (D-S.D.), said Daschle had "grave concerns about the congressional separation of powers issues raised by having one branch of government asking to polygraph employees of another branch."

Well, Mr. Daschle, did it occur to you that obeying the law might be a tad more important than your sanctimony? Buy a clue, Mr. Short-timer Majority Leader.

25 posted on 08/02/2002 4:43:05 AM PDT by GretchenEE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Why not just test Leahy first and save a lot of time and trouble?
26 posted on 08/02/2002 4:44:27 AM PDT by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Let see, I think it goes something like this: "If you are't doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about." I think that is what congress says every time they add some new instrusive power to the FBI's bag of tricks. Polygraphs are a joke as far as accuracy, but non-the-less are a powerful tool for ferreting out RATS.
27 posted on 08/02/2002 6:32:00 AM PDT by AdA$tra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Oh, and while we are at it, we should start drug testing congress. You think bus and train drivers are in mission critical decision making positions, how about the Senate Intel Committee. They are driving our national security bus.
28 posted on 08/02/2002 6:33:57 AM PDT by AdA$tra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Chuck Hagel was on FOX this morning sputtering about the proposed polygraphy. What a slime. National security concerns apparently don't even appear on his radar screen when it the defense of it might offend his dignity. Grrrr....
29 posted on 08/02/2002 6:35:45 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wm Bach
Why not just test Leahy first and save a lot of time and trouble?

Bump to that.

30 posted on 08/02/2002 6:36:10 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GretchenEE
McCain's comments are particularly nauseating, particularly galling, since he is the son and grandson of admirals and was held in Viet Nam and should, by now, have figured out a few things about wartime leaks.

Isn't he just dispicable? Let's post his comments for all to see.

During a congressional hearing Wednesday, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) questioned Rumsfeld about the level of the administration's concerns about leaks over Iraq policy, telling the defense secretary that unwanted disclosures are "a game that was played when you first came here nearly 30 years ago, and it will probably be played 30 years from now."

Add this in with his rationalisations about all politicians being corrupted by 'the system' re "I've done it, we've all done it..." and it's pretty clear that McCain is a moral relativist to the core. Anything goes, eh McStain?

31 posted on 08/02/2002 6:42:33 AM PDT by TigersEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
"The lawmakers are unhappy that the FBI, an agency they oversee, is investigating them. "

Screw these bums. They, like the FBI, work for us! They seem to forget that as soon as they are elected.

32 posted on 08/02/2002 6:45:03 AM PDT by Wurlitzer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Who were the 37 and who is on their staff?

Was Orin Hatch on the list. There is no doubt that he is a leaker. He leaked the cell phone interception very early on when he let his mouth run while his brain was not in gear.

33 posted on 08/02/2002 6:49:50 AM PDT by bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Please comrades, our leader has set 'new tone'. Be compassionate.

Compassionate airdance from lamp post.

34 posted on 08/02/2002 6:54:50 AM PDT by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Most of the lawmakers have told the FBI they would refuse a polygraph, citing the constitutional separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches of government...

There's a hypocritical red herring of an argument. The 'separation of powers' has to do with which branch represents who/what; (The Executive-the combined states, the House-the people, the Senate-the individual states {that was abolished with the 17th Ammendment} and the Judiciary-the law/constitution itself. If anything the Executive, which oversees the DOJ, has EVERY right to call for an investigation on Congress, which is supposed to legislate law not enforce it.

35 posted on 08/02/2002 6:59:53 AM PDT by TigersEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdA$tra
They are driving our national security short bus.
36 posted on 08/02/2002 7:01:08 AM PDT by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
I am being compassionate, I'd really prefer public hanging.
37 posted on 08/02/2002 8:36:53 AM PDT by SCHROLL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: glorygirl
Thanks for the heads up!
38 posted on 08/02/2002 9:25:28 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
I think President Bush should cut off the classofied briefings to Congress until they help find and punish the leakers. Let 'em moan, at least we won't give on enemies the info in advance. Sort of a NO THIEF, NO BRIEF policy.
39 posted on 08/03/2002 12:09:53 AM PDT by teletech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson