Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Edwards Exploits Brain-Damaged Child; Bush Scores Big! (My title)
The Raleigh News & Observer ^ | July 26, 2002 | ROB CHRISTENSEN AND JOHN WAGNER,

Posted on 07/26/2002 5:44:28 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost

Bush attacks big awards
President makes case on turf of potential foe while speaking at a fund-raiser for GOP Senate hopeful Elizabeth Dole.

By ROB CHRISTENSEN AND JOHN WAGNER, Staff Writers

HIGH POINT - President Bush took aim at excessive medical malpractice suits and trial lawyers Thursday in an event that had more than a whiff of 2004 presidential politics.

In a speech in High Point, the president called for new curbs on jury malpractice awards -- $250,000 on pain and suffering -- in what he said was an effort to hold down health-care costs and keep doctors from closing their practices because of high insurance premiums.

"What we want is quality health care, not rich trial lawyers," Bush told about 1,500 people in a sweltering Millis Athletic Center at High Point University.

Bush made the pitch in the back yard of Democratic U.S. Sen. John Edwards, a potential opponent in 2004 who made his fortune as a trial lawyer specializing in malpractice cases. In Washington, Edwards' response was swift. He called a teleconference with reporters and also made a speech on the Senate floor, where he said Bush again was taking sides with big corporations -- insurance companies -- against ordinary people hurt by bad medical care.

Edwards told reporters that Bush's proposal wouldn't affect small cases, but would limit compensation for patients who suffered great harm. "This will affect a situation where a child is blinded for life, where a child is paralyzed for life," he said.

Bush spent much of the day in the Triad, where he met privately with health care providers at High Point Regional Hospital and helped raise between $700,000 and $800,000 at a dinner at the Grandover Resort and Conference Center for GOP Senate candidate Elizabeth Dole.

The trip was Bush's fourth this year to North Carolina, where the White House hopes to keep the seat held by retiring Sen. Jesse Helms in Republican hands.

At a $1,000-a-plate dinner of herbed chicken and filet mignon, Bush praised Dole as someone he needs to get his programs through Congress. "It is important for North Carolina, and it is important for our country that Elizabeth Dole become the next United States senator from North Carolina," Bush said.

Earlier, in a gym packed with health-care workers and Republican supporters, Bush painted a picture of a health-care industry under siege from lawsuits -- with insurance premiums driving up health care costs, doctors performing unnecessary tests to protect against lawsuits and doctors being forced to quit their practices.

One of the examples he cited was Dr. John Schmitt, an obstetrician and gynecologist who gave up his practice in Raleigh last month to join the University of Virginia medical school faculty.

Schmitt, a member of the group that met privately with the president, said his malpractice insurance premiums rose last year from $17,000 to $46,000 and were expected to rise 20 percent to 30 percent in the fall.

"I gave it up because I was sick of dealing with it and working as hard as I was to make those premiums," Schmitt said in an interview. "There was also the stress issue that was driving a wedge between me and my patients."

Bush said the malpractice cases were hurting not only physicians, but their patients, citing the case of Lauri Peel, a Raleigh resident and co-owner of a Raleigh store.

"Lauri Peel had trouble finding a doc when she moved to Raleigh because a lot of the practices were full," Bush said. "Then she ran into Dr. Schmitt. They got a wonderful relationship. Lauri has to find a new doctor she can trust. Lauri's looking for a doc right now. Yet another compelling, real life story about what's taking place all across the country."

The president said that in North Carolina, as well as eight other states, at least two companies raised liability insurance premiums 30 percent this year.

Bush, who was accompanied on the trip by Tommy Thompson, his secretary of health and human services, and by his chief political adviser, Karl Rove, left little doubt that he placed a share of the blame on trial lawyers.

Edwards, in his teleconference with reporters arranged by the Democratic National Committee, linked Bush's proposal to what he called the administration's overall philosophy of siding with big business.

"It's striking that at a time when Wall Street is in shambles [and] the economy is struggling ... the president has chosen to go to North Carolina to help insurance companies against the victims of bad medical care," Edwards said.

Edwards also introduced to reporters the parents of a baby born severely brain-damaged because of a medical error. In 1997, when the child was 3, Edwards secured a $23 million jury verdict in the case, an award cited as an example of plaintiffs winning "the litigation lottery" in a Bush administration report released Thursday.

Christopher Griffin, the father of the baby girl, who died a year-and-a-half ago, said he was angered by the characterization. Griffin's child, Bailey, could not walk, speak or eat normally, and required 24-hour-a-day care.

"What I heard was in some ways we're considered to be lottery winners," Griffin said. "Every time I go to my daughter's grave, it's hard to feel that way."

In his speech on the Senate floor, Edwards said the Bush administration had "been dragged kicking and screaming" to embrace corporate responsibility reforms, had stymied the development of a meaningful patients' bill of rights and "consistently sided with the big drug companies" to prevent the addition of a prescription-drug benefit to Medicare.

Although Bush talked mainly about malpractice reform, he also sought to reassure people about the economy, saying "the fundamentals for economic growth are strong."

Bush won high marks from Stephanie Shafer, a 25-year-old registered nurse at High Point Regional, who voted for Democrat Al Gore in 2000 but who said she would vote for Bush in 2004.

"I have been very impressed with the job the president has been doing," Shafer said.

But to see the president, you had to have connections or pay $1,000 to attend the Dole fund-raiser.

That didn't sit well with Carolyn Walley of High Point, who watched from the sidewalk with her daughter outside the college gym.

"One thousand is an awful lot for regular people," Walley said. "It would be nice if we could actually see them."

© Copyright 2002, The News & Observer. All material found on newsobserver.com is copyrighted The News & Observer and associated news services. No material may be reproduced or reused without explicit permission from The News & Observer, Raleigh, North Carolina.

The News & Observer is owned by The McClatchy Company.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ambulancechaser; bjjr; blowdriedhair; edwards; edwardswatch; liar; northcarolina; oldnorthstate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
I don't understand why Edwards didn't trot out the parents of a TRIAL lawyer -- the REAL "victims" of W's proposal.
1 posted on 07/26/2002 5:44:29 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Can you bump this to the list . . .
2 posted on 07/26/2002 5:57:57 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
Once again President Bush speaks out courageously for what is right and good for the American people, regardless of the consequences. But he is treading on thin ice. The trial lawyers' lobby is powerful and well versed in the art of persuasion. If Bush defeats them on this issue, he will definitely grace Mount Rushmore. However, this ice is so thin that I would have advised him not to go there. Maybe he's smarter than I am. I hope so.
3 posted on 07/26/2002 6:04:05 AM PDT by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
Edwards is really running for the VP slot. He is too air-headed to head the ticket and even if he runs at #2, they will keep him from answering questions in public because then folks would know just how air-headed he is. He came off as a real empty suit on "Meet The Press" spouting the same over-rehearsed lines over and over again no matter what the question. Mostly he just ranted on about needing "new leadership" without offering specific answers to questions.
4 posted on 07/26/2002 6:10:07 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
There is no need to limit awards. Just adopt a "loser pays" policy.
5 posted on 07/26/2002 6:17:20 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
Will do, sir!
6 posted on 07/26/2002 6:37:22 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: *Edwards Watch; *Old_North_State; **North_Carolina; mykdsmom; KOZ.; borntodiefree; azhenfud; ...
Click the negative for *Edwards Watch articles!

7 posted on 07/26/2002 6:39:04 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
Understood. No one should doubt
W's intelligence. Want a great gambit -- he cam to Edwards back yard to talk about tort reform. BJ Jr. looked like an idiot standing up for the rights of LAWYERS.
8 posted on 07/26/2002 6:40:40 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
I disagree a little -- his ego is running for president, his ambition will settle for VP. And don't forget -- a quarter of the voters will vote for his hair.
9 posted on 07/26/2002 6:42:06 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Thanks.
10 posted on 07/26/2002 6:42:54 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
Start using the term: BIG LAW
11 posted on 07/26/2002 6:45:58 AM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
Ok - will check back in later after I get some work done!
12 posted on 07/26/2002 6:47:05 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
I wonder how much of that $23 million went for lawyer fees and trial costs. I bet the family ended up with very little. If the lawyers are so concerned about their clients' welfare, maybe they should cap their fees to something like the actual time spent at a reasonable hourly rate.
13 posted on 07/26/2002 6:47:34 AM PDT by AmusedBystander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
BIG LAW
BIG LAW
BIG LAW
BIG LAW
BIG LAW

Great idea, Doug!


14 posted on 07/26/2002 6:48:35 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
I disagree a little -- his ego is running for president, his ambition will settle for VP. And don't forget -- a quarter of the voters will vote for his hair.

And more than a few will vote for the lip-wart.

15 posted on 07/26/2002 6:52:23 AM PDT by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
I hope you're right, and I hope Bush has made a smart move.

However, trial lawyers are powerful, and a talent for persuasion is what makes them very rich.

There was a time when I had deep respect for the innate genius of the American people. That began to disappear somewhere back there when they laughed at the antics of their twice-elected psychopathic president, shrugged off the Democrats' sale of military secrets to China, couldn't halt third world immigration, and allowed malpractice litigation to price medical care out of the reach of everyone...

Huge numbers of Americans have revealed themselves to be easy dupes.

I'm not the only one who has noticed. America's enemies abroad are also very much aware of this.

16 posted on 07/26/2002 6:52:27 AM PDT by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Clinton won two terms when he campaigned the same way in !992.

With the dumbed-down American electorate, most dem voters have never heard of him and think that John Kerry from MA is Bob Kerry, X-senator from Nebraska.

Gore and Clinton are well-known to the dim-bulb, dem voters but the DNC wants Gore to raise money and bow out.

Clinton will raise big bucks but she won't bow out.

She might settle for VP but that's not her goal.

17 posted on 07/26/2002 6:56:10 AM PDT by johnny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
"Huge numbers of Americans have revealed themselves to be easy dupes."

Totally agree with that.
RE the trial lawyers: They are powerful but they've never had anyone with command of the national stage to take them on. I would think that it would be pretty easy to make them look like the greedy, opportunistic cruds most of them are. And I think this was done as much to associate Edwards with that ilk as anything else.

18 posted on 07/26/2002 6:59:33 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lee'sGhost
I disagree a little -- his ego is running for president, his ambition will settle for VP. And don't forget -- a quarter of the voters will vote for his hair.

Okay, please understand that plenty of Democrats are stupid enough to actually go in and pull a lever for this blow-dried empty suit. Every time I see that clown on TV I think of Michael Huffington. Too bad for Edwards that he is married. The things that Arianna could do for him are scary.

I think that Edwards and other smart Democrats understand that Al Gore's ego is bigger than his "member" and that he will run again, a la Adlai Stevenson. This despite the defection of many of Al Gore's former supporters, like Bob Shrum, to the Edwards camp and the enmity of Hillary's people. The rank and file Sturmabteilungen see Al Gore as their Ernst Roehm, sans the screaming homosexuality. So many of the activist, DU types want to see Al Gore win again that they'd be willing to jump off the cliffs at Beachy Head to see it happen.

Gore-Edwards sounds good to me. So good that the Vice Presidential debates would be fun to watch. I'm not even worried about the Presidential debates, as Bush has grown in such stature that he would, quite calmly, deflect the gesticulations of Mr. Timbertoes. Rather, it's the Condi Rice-John Edwards debate that would be absolutely a treasure.

Condi would have Edwards' lunch. Period. Even if Dick Cheney is kept on, which I doubt, that debate would be a laugher.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

19 posted on 07/26/2002 7:02:40 AM PDT by section9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: section9
"Rather, it's the Condi Rice-John Edwards debate that would be absolutely a treasure. "

WWwwweeewwwwww, I hadn't thought of that. You are so right!

20 posted on 07/26/2002 7:45:35 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson