[the Deejay]

But the body was drug from the NORTH of the recovery site. Why park on the paved road, drag the body up the incline to the north & drag it back down to the clump of trees?

Remember, THE BODY WAS DRUG FROM THE TOP, WHICH IS NORTH. Not east, from the paved road.

[VRWC_minion]

Remember, THE BODY WAS DRUG FROM THE TOP, WHICH IS NORTH. Not east, from the paved road

Is this in testimony. Sorry for my ignorance. Isn't there a post a few up that says this came from someone speculating that a RV wouldn't stop on main road ?

[juzcuz]

I think the body was drug Due South from Due North ( the golf course, Due North). I can understand skin drug by animals all around randomly. However, hair (clumps of hair)left from 15-80-90 feet Due North of body in a trail type (Pattern) would have to be pulled out in clumps .... to leave it that way.

[Spunky]

Remember, THE BODY WAS DRUG FROM THE TOP, WHICH IS NORTH. Not east, from the paved road.

Deejay, I do believe you miss understood the testimony.

The person testified to the fact that the drag marks were north (you are correct here) but they were parallel to the body. There was no trail from the north to where the body was found.

When asked by the defense if the drag marks were the size a hand would make the answer was NO! When asked if the drag marks were the size a body would make the answer was NO! The witness then said they were the size that intrails would make.

The indication by the testimony was that an animal had come and taken some insides out of the body, went a ways then dropped them, then drug them for a ways.