Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

sorry TRASH - pathetic TRASH - CLINTON LOVE CHILD LAWSUIT - DNA test ordered
The National Enquirer ^ | July 23, 2002 | Jim Nelson

Posted on 07/22/2002 9:54:35 PM PDT by Socks C.

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 next last
To: Alissa
Without Paul Pearson FIRST taking the DNA test, this story will go nowhere. Actually I am surprised that he didn't already take the DNA test if he is so worried about Anthony's paternity.
81 posted on 07/23/2002 8:35:32 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
The Philadelphia Inquirer ( the more scandalous) Inquirer, is probably gearing up right now to blame DUBYA.
They'll say it is his kid and we should have a tax hike. (The Inquirer always wants tax hikes.) LOL
82 posted on 07/23/2002 8:37:03 AM PDT by Temple Owl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
I'm with you. It's about money and money only. No concern for the child at all. If he was so concerned why didn't he do this years ago? Because Bill Clinton was dirt poor that's why. He sounds like he is as sorry as either of the Clintons but he should at least think about the harm he's doing to that child. I'm certainly no fan of the Clintons but this is about money. And, no, Hillary will not leave Bill Clinton. She needs him to get elected president.

This is sad. Having that child's picture in the National Enquirer. Now, that's really low just to make a buck.

83 posted on 07/23/2002 8:51:04 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
This reminds me of an I Love Lucy episode when Ethel told Lucy...."Stay married to him.....that'll teach him!!". LOL
84 posted on 07/23/2002 8:56:08 AM PDT by JessicaDragonet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: daisyscarlett
Dat's because Chelsea's dad is Webster Hubbel
85 posted on 07/23/2002 9:02:33 AM PDT by My Favorite Headache
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Socks C.
bubba skates on this one!

whenever paternity becomes an issue, you gotta check out the child's nose.

like chelsea, this kid does not have bubba's phallic nose.

86 posted on 07/23/2002 9:05:03 AM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Socks C.
What I'd like to know is:
Who's the lovely lady at the top of the Enquirer cover page?

87 posted on 07/23/2002 9:07:18 AM PDT by FourtySeven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Socks C.
You know, I'm about the same age as that d***wad and he's got the worst looking baggy eyes I've ever seen.
Can't wait to see him in 20 more years!!

He'll claim that DNA stands for 'Do Not Assume'

88 posted on 07/23/2002 9:07:22 AM PDT by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Socks C.
This guy could quickly end speculation if "He" or Slick is the father. Submit to his own DNA test. IF it's the same as the young lad's, then the question about Slick is mute. Can't figure out why he doesnt' do that right away if he's got questions about who the kids pop is.

This is the perfect whip up the Clinton Haters.

89 posted on 07/23/2002 9:10:05 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
This is sad. Having that child's picture in the National Enquirer. Now, that's really low just to make a buck.

I'm with you. And I thought that myself, why didn't the "father" ask these questions and make Clinton take tests years ago? No money is right.

90 posted on 07/23/2002 9:58:42 AM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven
What I'd like to know is: Who's the lovely lady at the top of the Enquirer cover page?

Of the multiple sharp, keen, insightfull posts to
this IMPORTANT thread your question deserves top priority response.
Good work. (sorry for the truncated pic - please forgive)

91 posted on 07/23/2002 11:10:04 AM PDT by Socks C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Socks C.
LOL.....thanks. ;)
92 posted on 07/23/2002 11:11:30 AM PDT by FourtySeven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Nita Nupress
Aahhhhh.... Just like the good ol' days!

Sick women REALLY turn me ON!!!

93 posted on 07/23/2002 11:12:41 AM PDT by Socks C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: FryingPan101
Maybe he'll *accidently* fall off a cliff...(looks hopeful)
94 posted on 07/23/2002 11:44:19 AM PDT by belleoftheball414
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Socks C.; Phil V.
Welcome back, Socks! Glad you got out from under Betty's bed.....

FR is much more fun with your 'trash'!


95 posted on 07/23/2002 2:23:05 PM PDT by JulieRNR21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Socks C.
I can't imagine that Pearson would file a lawsuit if he hadn't already had DNA tests performed on himself and the son. His attorney certainly would have demanded it before embarking on an expensive and time-consuming wild-goose chase.

I sure would like to see a photo of Pearson himself, also. Particularly as a younger man.

Another sordid episode in the continuing legacy of the Sinkmeister and all those who spun in his orbit.

Leni

96 posted on 07/23/2002 2:39:55 PM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower; Angelwood; sauropod; StarFan; Howlin
That cool cat Socks is back BUMP....
97 posted on 07/23/2002 2:57:26 PM PDT by JulieRNR21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Socks C.
Good to see ya back!

BTW, I saw an ad on the telly for an AUTOMATED lump remover for your litter pan!

Think Mrs. C. would like one for an anniversary gift? 'Pod

98 posted on 07/23/2002 3:15:46 PM PDT by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: countrydummy; ned13; KLT; 47carollann; dixie sass; Angelwood
And you girls thought you had all the fun!
99 posted on 07/23/2002 3:17:17 PM PDT by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Socks C.
Dolly gave birth to Anthony Pearson in 1981, but a DNA test has never been conducted to determine paternity Anthony bears a striking resemblance to Clinton, with similar complexion, facial and bodily characteristics, posture and even personality.

Same personality, now I am scared.

Same bodily characteristics...now I'm not going anywhere near that comment.

100 posted on 07/23/2002 3:20:41 PM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson